Comparison Of Phase Retrieval Filter Methods

Piotr W. Kiedron

doi:10.1117/12.942095

29 January 1988 Comparison Of Phase Retrieval Filter Methods

Piotr W. Kiedron

Proceedings Volume 0828, Digital Image Recovery and Synthesis; (1988) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.942095
Event: 31st Annual Technical Symposium on Optical and Optoelectronic Applied Sciences and Engineering, 1987, San Diego, CA, United States

Abstract

Three filter methods with proved phase-retrieval uniqueness are compared using the Gerchberg-Saxton-Misell error reduction algorithm. Defocusing, differential, and exponential filter methods are used in the one-dimensional simulations. Stagnation of the convergence process occurs more often with differential and exponential filters than with the defocusing filter and it is more likely for objects containing higher frequencies.

Citation Download Citation

Piotr W. Kiedron "Comparison Of Phase Retrieval Filter Methods", Proc. SPIE 0828, Digital Image Recovery and Synthesis, (29 January 1988); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.942095

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available