Paper
28 May 2014 Active versus passive projector nonlinear gamma compensation method for high-quality fringe pattern generation
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
This paper presents our comparing study on active and passive methods for compensating the phase error induced by the projector nonlinear gamma effect. The active method modifies the fringe patterns before their projection; and the passive method, in contrast, compensates for the phase error after capturing fringe patterns. Our study finds that the active method tends to provides more consistent high-quality fringe patterns regardless the amount of projector’s defocusing; yet the effectiveness of the passive method is sensitive to the measurement conditions, albeit the passive method could provide equally good quality phase under the optimal calibration condition. Experimental results will be presented to compare these two different methods.
© (2014) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Song Zhang "Active versus passive projector nonlinear gamma compensation method for high-quality fringe pattern generation", Proc. SPIE 9110, Dimensional Optical Metrology and Inspection for Practical Applications III, 911002 (28 May 2014); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2050534
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 8 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Projection systems

Error analysis

Calibration

Fringe analysis

3D metrology

Phase shifts

Cameras

Back to Top