Open Access
31 July 2024 Enhanced terahertz generation via plasma modulation on two bunches
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Terahertz (THz) radiation finds important applications in various fields, making the study of THz sources significant. Among different approaches, electron accelerator-based THz sources hold notable advantages in generating THz radiation with narrow bandwidth, high brightness, high peak power, and high repetition rate. To further improve the THz radiation energy, the bunching factor of the free electron bunch train needs to be increased. We propose and numerically reveal that, by adding an additional short-pulse drive beam before the main beam as the excitation source of nonlinear plasma wake, the bunching factor of the main beam can be further increased to 0.94, even though with a relatively low charge, low current, and relatively diffused electron beam. Two such electron beams with loose requirements can be easily generated using typical photoinjectors. Our work provides a way for a new THz source with enhanced radiation energy.

1.

Introduction

The demand for electromagnetic waves in the terahertz (THz) range is significant, spanning various applications, such as molecular spectroscopy, compact electron acceleration, medical imaging, and security checking.14 Over the past two decades, remarkable advancements have been achieved in the development of diverse THz radiation sources. Notably, electron accelerator-based THz sources have garnered substantial global interest due to their potential to generate THz radiation with narrow bandwidth, high energy, exceptional brightness, and impressive repetition rates ranging from kilohertz to megahertz.57 Despite the existence of various techniques for generating narrowband THz radiation,810 the utilization of electron bunch trains holds immense potential for producing highly intense and narrowband THz radiation based on Smith–Purcell radiation,11 undulator radiation,12 etc. The crucial factor in achieving coherent THz radiation lies in the precise manipulation of the beam phase-space distribution, enabling the formation of microbunches with picosecond (ps) or even sub-picosecond spacing.1315 This approach offers promising prospects for advancing the field of THz generation.

The generation of the desired bunch train has been a subject of intense investigation, for example, directly modulating the drive laser,13,1619 transforming transverse modulation to a longitudinal distribution,20,21 using self-modulation instability in a linear plasma wake,22 converting energy modulation induced by wakefields in dielectric-lined or corrugated waveguides to density bunching,2327 and transforming laser-induced energy modulation to a density distribution.11,2830 For the bunch train, the bunching factor b, defined as b(k)=I(z)eikzdz/I(z)dz with the beam current distribution I(z) and the modulation wave number k, is used to reflect the coherence of the longitudinal density distribution of electron beams. The coherent THz radiation energy is proportional to the square of the bunching factor b. Therefore, the larger b, the stronger the radiation energy. However, in the above methods, even under conditions of theoretically ideal simulations, the bunching factor b is limited to 0.4, which restricts the acquisition of higher radiation energy.

An alternative method of inducing energy and density modulation in an electron beam is to utilize the plasma medium. Recently, the use of uniform plasma-based modulators has been proposed to generate ultrahigh peak-current (10  kA level) electron bunch trains with tunable ps spacing and high bunching factors.14 In the scheme, a high-charge (several nC) and high-current electron beam traverses a uniform plasma section and initiates a periodic “sawtooth” nonlinear plasma wake when the beam density is higher than the plasma density. This interaction leads to energy gain or loss for electrons at different positions, creating a sawtooth-shaped energy modulation along the bunch. Subsequently, a magnetic compressor is employed to efficiently convert this energy modulation into beam density modulation, resulting in the formation of microbunches with an impressive bunching factor of 0.8.14 Although the scheme offers clear advantages, to excite a high-quality nonlinear plasma wakefield, the electron beam should be focused to a very small transverse size [5  μm in root mean square (RMS)] and its current distribution is preferred to be a flattop distribution, which is hard to realize in practical experiments.

Here, we propose a novel two-bunch scheme for the generation of high-power coherent THz radiation. In this scheme, an additional short-pulse drive beam is added before the main beam as the excitation source of nonlinear plasma wake. This innovative approach can significantly loosen the requirements on main beam parameters (transverse size, longitudinal current distribution, etc.) and improve the bunching factor to 0.94, thereby optimizing the energy conversion efficiency of THz generation. As passive modulation, compared with dielectric-lined or corrugated waveguide-based energy modulators, using plasma wakefield to implement energy modulation has unique advantages in tuning modulation frequency, avoiding radio-frequency (RF) breakdown, providing an ideal sawtooth energy modulation, etc. The nonlinear plasma wake has very good wakefield properties within the ion channel, including a constant longitudinal field in the transverse dimension and a uniform focusing gradient along the longitudinal dimension. These properties effectively preserve the energy spread and emittance of the beam slice.

2.

Principles and Methods

As shown in Fig. 1(a), two electron beams enter a uniform plasma sequentially. The first beam, referred to as the “drive beam,” is characterized by relatively low or moderate charge but high current (kA) for its short bunch length (<ps). The drive beam boosts a brief duration and exceptionally high current, and even if its transverse size may be relatively large, its density significantly surpasses that of the surrounding plasma, resulting in an ideal sawtooth-shaped wakefield. The second beam, referred to as the “main beam,” features a relatively long bunch length (ps) and low current. Following the drive beam in plasma that excites a strong nonlinear wakefield, the main beam would not only experience the linear wakefield produced by itself but also gain modulation from the nonlinear wakefield generated by the former. Given that the current/density of the drive beam is much higher than that of the main beam, the nonlinear wakefield excited by the drive beam dominates the energy modulation process while the linear wakefield self-excited by the main beam plays a little role; therefore, there are no stringent demands on the transverse size or current profile of the main beam. Then, a small magnetic chicane located next to the plasma section is used to detour the electron bunch, and the sawtooth energy modulation of the main beam is converted to a density distribution with a very high bunching factor. Since the two beams have slight differences in energy, their different motion paths and deflection angles in the chicane could be applied to block the drive beam and have the main beam enter the subsequent section for radiation by introducing a metal (such as tungsten) slit as an energy filter.

Fig. 1

(a) Schematic layout of tunable intense narrowband THz radiation generation, which consists of a uniform plasma section, a chicane, an undulator, and three quadrupoles. (b) Simulation result of plasma density when the drive beam and the main beam (propagating from left to right) pass through the uniform plasma successively. (c) The Ez field excited by two beams (left figure), and the lineout of the on-axis Ez (x=0  μm, ξ) (right figure) illustrating an ideal sawtooth shape.

APN_3_4_046014_f001.png

To illustrate the key physics in the above scheme, a detailed theoretical analysis is carried out. For a uniform plasma section with density np and a relativistic electron beam with density nb, length Lb, and RMS spot size σr (transverse Gaussian profile), nonlinear plasma wakefields are excited and plasma bubbles are formed when nb>np.31 The shape of the excited bubble is represented by the trajectory of the innermost particle. The longitudinal wakefield Ez is found to be proportional to the product of the local radius of the ion channel rb and the slope drb/dξ,32

Eq. (1)

Ez(ξ)12rbdrbdξ,
where ξ=ctz with the light speed in vacuum c and the electron beam moving direction +z.

The normalized maximum radius of the ion channel is kprm2.58Λ,14 in which kp=npe2/mε0c2 is the plasma wavenumber, Λ=0kpr(nbnp)dkpr=(nbnp)kp2σr2=2Ib/IA is the normalized charge per unit length, e is the electron charge, m is the rest mass of the electron, ε0 is the vacuum dielectric constant, Ib=Qc/Lb is the peak current of the beam, and IA17  kA is the Alfven current.

In this case, the trajectory of the inner particles of the ion channel can be simplified as32

Eq. (2)

(1+14rb2)d2rbdξ2+12rb(drbdξ)2+12rb=λ(ξ)rb,
where the drive term λ(ξ) in the beam region is Λ and outside the beam region is 0. Normalized units are applied here with the lengths normalized to skin depth kp1, densities to the plasma density np, charges to the electron charge e, and fields to the cold nonrelativistic wave-breaking limit Ep=mkpc2/e.

As the beam enters into the plasma section, a series of bubbles are excited along the propagating direction. In each bubble, we have drb/dξ=0 at the maximum radius position (ξ,rb)=(ξm,i,rm), in which i is the bubble number, and m indicates the maximum radius position. Applying Taylor expansion at ξ=ξm,i, we have

Eq. (3)

rb(ξ)rm+12d2rbdξ2  ξm,i(ξξm,i)2,
and thus obtain

Eq. (4)

drbdξd2rbdξ2ξm,i(ξξm,i),
and

Eq. (5)

Ez(ξ)12rbdrbdξ12rmd2rbdξ2ξm,i(ξξm,i).

From Eq. (2), we have

Eq. (6)

d2rbdξ2(ξm,i)=12λ(ξm,i)/rm21+14rm2rm,
and thus the slope of Ez at ξ=ξm,i is

Eq. (7)

dEzdξ(ξm,i)=12rm212λ(ξm,i)/rm21+14rm2.

Since the main beam is applied to generate THz radiation, the analysis focuses on its energy modulation. When the two beams enter the uniform plasma section, the drive beam moving ahead exists mainly at the first bubble, while the main beam exists at the second, third, fourth, and the following bubbles. Therefore, we focus on the field distributions of the second and the following bubbles. Since the beam current of the drive beam is much higher than that of the main beam, the radius of the first bubble rm,1 is the largest, and rm,i(i2) is relatively small, namely, rm,1>rm,i(i2). Assuming rm,2rm,3rm,4=α·rm,1 (0<α<1), the value of α could be obtained through numerical simulations. Since the main beam for generating radiation exists in the second and the following bubbles, we focus on the field distributions in these bubbles. Taking the second bubble as an example, Eq. (7) is still applicable; that is, the slope of the longitudinal electric field is

Eq. (8)

dEzdξ(ξm,2)=12rm,2212λ(ξm,2)/rm,221+14rm,22,
where λ(ξm,2)=2Iwitness/IA, and rm,2α·rm,1=α·2.582IdriveIA.

3.

Results

To further demonstrate the practical validity of the above scheme, we show here a typical example through self-consistent three-dimensional (3D) simulations utilizing a set of thoroughly benchmarked codes. The propagation of the two beams within the uniform plasma is simulated using the particle-in-cell code QuickPIC.3335 Subsequently, the macroparticles of the beam are imported into the general particle tracer (GPT) code,36 enabling comprehensive tracking of the beams’ six-dimensional (6D) phase-space dynamics in the chicane.

In our simulations, the drive beam is characterized by a beam current of 2 kA, beam charge of 1 nC, and flattop current profile of 0.5 ps (Lb=0.15  mm). The main beam with the energy of 135 MeV has a beam current of Iwitness=0.3  kA, beam charge 1.5 nC, and 5 ps flattop current profile (Lb=1.5  mm). The simulation parameters are shown in Table 1 in detail. Two such electron beams with the above characteristics and a suitable time delay can be generated using typical photoinjectors together with the following injector linac sections. 18,37,38

Table 1

Parameters of the two beams in the simulations.

ParameterDrive BeamMain BeamUnit
Beam charge11.5nC
Energy130135MeV
Peak current20.3kA
Beam length (flattop)0.55ps
Normalized emittance44mm·mrad
Transverse beam size (RMS)1515μm

The plasma density distribution after the two beams propagating into the plasma is shown in Fig. 1(b). Since the current of the drive beam is much higher than that of the main beam, the radius of the first bubble rm,1 is the largest, and rm,N (N2) are relatively small. The excited longitudinal wakefield Ez in x-ξ plane and the on-axis lineout of Ez clearly show the feature of a sawtooth waveform in Fig. 1(c). With the drive beam current of Idrive=2  kA, we can have rm,1=2.582IdriveIA1.24. In the second bubble, λ(ξm,2)=2IwitnessIA0.035, α0.8 (that is rm,21), thus the slope of Ez (normalized to meωp2/e) is 0.19. In the simulation, as in Fig. 1(c), rm,11.23 and the slope of Ez is 0.20, which are both in good agreement with the theoretical results. A lead collimator is placed between the plasma and the chicane, leading to a prebunching effect. The electrons in the region of positive Ez slope have a relatively large transverse momentum px, which can be removed during further transport with the prebunching effect. Such an effect will further reduce the DC component after the chicane and increase the bunching factor. By assuming that electrons with |px|>1  mc can be removed, the charge-loss ratio is relatively low (30%).

We then use the particle tracking code GPT to further track the beam 6D phase-space dynamics in the chicane. In the simulation, the R56 represents the change in the average beam position along the beamline per unit change in the particle’s momentum,39 which is applied to quantify the dispersion effect in the chicane. Dependence of longitudinal position on momentum is mainly caused by transverse dispersion (η) in bending magnets, which results in different path lengths for particles with different momenta. The simulated R56 value of “full compression” is 0.96  mm; the beam longitudinal phase space is shown in Fig. 2(a). The beam energy modulation is converted into density modulation, resulting in the microbunches with an ideal bunching factor. Each microbunch stands nearly upright, which leads to a high peak current. The corresponding current profile shown in Fig. 2(b) reveals that the bunch length of each microbunch reduces to 50  fs (RMS) and the peak current reaches 4.5  kA. Thus, the corresponding bunching factor b at the fundamental and harmonic frequencies could be calculated and are shown in Fig. 2(c). The b value reaches 0.94 at the fundamental frequency and over 0.5 at high harmonic frequencies, which is larger than those of previous methods with no stringent demands.

Fig. 2

Simulated characteristics of electrons after the main beam of 135 MeV is compressed in the chicane. (a) The beam longitudinal phase space for the “full compression” case, with R56=0.96  mm. (b) The corresponding beam current distribution with bunch length of each microbunch reduced to 50  fs. (c) The bunching factor values at the fundamental and harmonic frequencies. The b value reaches 0.94 at the fundamental frequency and over 0.5 at high harmonic frequencies.

APN_3_4_046014_f002.png

Sending the bunch train through a helical undulator, the radiation at the THz frequency region could be emitted. With undulator period λu=20  cm and the peak magnetic field Bu=1.1  T, the undulator strength K=0.934λuBu=20.5, and the radiation can be resonant at 1.13 THz (corresponding radiation wavelength λr=264  μm with the plasma density np=1.6×1016  cm3).

As a longitudinally dispersive element, the undulator causes overcompression or debunching of a fully compressed electron beam and leads to a slight reduction in the bunching factor and thus the output THz radiation. To obtain a high average bunching factor within the undulator, the beam is undercompressed in the chicane to obtain a bunching factor of 0.85 at the entrance of the undulator. As the beam propagates in the undulator, it will be first further compressed to the full-compression and then overcompressed case. The simulation of the bunch trains passing through the undulator is carried out using the well-benchmarked code GENESIS,40,41 and the space charge effect is also included. As shown in Fig. 3, simulation results show that with a 5 m-long undulator, the emitted THz pulse energy can reach as high as 2.4 mJ. The radiation is also highly directional, which is of great advantage in advanced scientific explorations. When the beam charge increases, the energy increases and reaches a high level accordingly, since the bunching factor is above 0.9 when loosening the requirements on the two bunches.

Fig. 3

Radiation energy versus the propagation distance within the undulator. The emitted THz pulse energy can reach an energy as high as 2.4 mJ in a 5 m-long undulator.

APN_3_4_046014_f003.png

Lowering the energy of the electron beam is beneficial for improving the energy conversion efficiency. Therefore, we further explored the feasibility of the scheme at lower electron energies. Reducing the energy of the dual bunch in the previous section to 50 MeV with other parameters unchanged, the simulated results of the beam are shown in Fig. 4. With the same plasma length (3.7 mm), the absolute value of energy modulation received by the electron beam is the same, but the relative energy spread is obviously increased [see Fig. 4(a); compared with that in Fig. 2(a)] due to the decrease of the initial energy. In Fig. 2(a), the longitudinal phase space is “rigid,” while in Fig. 4(a) there is an obvious curvature, which results from the nonlinear process of magnetic compression. When the relative energy spread increases, the nonlinearity of the beam longitudinal phase space becomes apparent. In this case, the bunching factor is 0.85 at the fundamental frequency.

Fig. 4

Simulated characteristics of electrons after the main beam of 50 MeV is compressed in the chicane. (a) The beam longitudinal phase space with an obvious curvature, resulting from the nonlinear process of magnetic compression. (b) The corresponding beam current distribution. (c) The corresponding bunching factor values at the fundamental and harmonic frequencies after density modulation. The bunching factor is 0.85 at the fundamental frequency.

APN_3_4_046014_f004.png

In order to reduce the influence of relative energy spread, we decrease the length of the uniform plasma. Figure 5(a) shows the beam phase space with a plasma length decreased to 2.7 mm. Compared with Fig. 4(a), the relative energy spread decreases, and the longitudinal phase space is more rigid. Figures 5(b) and 5(c) show the current distribution and bunching factor b under different plasma lengths, with the red line indicating that the highest bunching factor b reaches 0.9. Through simulations, radiation energy in the same order can still be obtained. Therefore, by reducing the length of the plasma, the energy spread of the beam can be reduced and the bunching factor b could be improved through the magnetic compression process. With reduced plasma length and energy spread, the radiation energy could be further increased by 10%.

Fig. 5

After the compression process in the chicane under the two plasma lengths, (a) the beam phase space when the plasma lengths are 3.7 (red) and 2.7 mm (blue), respectively. The energy spread is lower when the plasma length is reduced. (b) The current distribution comparison. (c) The bunching factor is increased from 0.85 to 0.9 at the fundamental frequency of 1 THz when the plasma length is reduced from 3.7 (red) to 2.7 mm (blue).

APN_3_4_046014_f005.png

4.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we propose and study an approach leveraging uniform plasma to sequentially modulate two bunches, aimed at enhancing THz radiation generation. Through theoretical analysis and comprehensive simulations, it is revealed that, by adding an additional short-pulse drive beam before the main beam as the excitation source of nonlinear plasma wake, the bunching factor of the main beam can be further increased to 0.94 even though with a relatively low charge, low current, and large-size electron beam. Consequently, significant strides have been made in boosting THz radiation energy while mitigating constraints, such as beam charge and transverse beam size. The findings of this research not only contribute to the scientific understanding of THz radiation generation but also pave the way for potential breakthroughs in the practical utilization of this valuable radiation.

Code and Data Availability

All data and codes in support of the findings of this paper are available from the authors upon request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2023YFB2806703) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. U22A6004, 62301294, and 11835004), and was funded by the National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Vacuum Electronics.

References

1. 

E. A. Nanni et al., “Terahertz-driven linear electron acceleration,” Nat. Commun., 6 (1), 8486 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9486 NCAOBW 2041-1723 (2015). Google Scholar

2. 

P. H. Siegel, “Terahertz technology,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., 50 (3), 910 –928 https://doi.org/10.1109/22.989974 IETMAB 0018-9480 (2002). Google Scholar

3. 

M. Liu et al., “Terahertz-field-induced insulator-to-metal transition in vanadium dioxide metamaterial,” Nature, 487 (7407), 345 –348 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11231 (2012). Google Scholar

4. 

T. Kampfrath, K. Tanaka and K. Nelson, “Resonant and on resonant control over matter and light by intense terahertz transients,” Nat. Photonics, 7 (9), 680 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.184 NPAHBY 1749-4885 (2013). Google Scholar

5. 

P. Kramer et al., “Enabling high repetition rate nonlinear THz science with a kilowatt-class sub-100 fs laser source,” Opt. Express, 28 16951 –16967 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.389653 OPEXFF 1094-4087 (2020). Google Scholar

6. 

J. Buldt et al., “Fiber laser-driven gas plasma-based generation of THz radiation with 50-mW average power,” Appl. Phys. B, 126 2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-019-7353-2 (2020). Google Scholar

7. 

G. Carr et al., “High-power terahertz radiation from relativistic electrons,” Nature, 420 153 –156 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01175 (2002). Google Scholar

8. 

A. S. Weling et al., “Generation of tunable narrow-band THz radiation from large aperture photoconducting antennas,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 64 (2), 137 –139 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.111543 APPLAB 0003-6951 (1994). Google Scholar

9. 

J. Y. Sohn et al., “Tunable terahertz generation using femtosecond pulse shaping,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 81 (1), 13 –15 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1490140 APPLAB 0003-6951 (2002). Google Scholar

10. 

S. Bielawski et al., “Tunable narrowband terahertz emission from mastered laser–electron beam interaction,” Nat. Phys., 4 (5), 390 –393 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys916 NPAHAX 1745-2473 (2008). Google Scholar

11. 

Z. Zhang et al., “Generation of high-power, tunable terahertz radiation from laser interaction with a relativistic electron beam,” Phys. Rev. Spl. Top.-Accel. Beams, 20 (5), 050701 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.20.050701 (2017). Google Scholar

12. 

Y. Liang et al., “Selective excitation and control of coherent terahertz Smith-Purcell radiation by high-intensity period-tunable train of electron micro-bunches,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 113 (17), 171104 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5054583 APPLAB 0003-6951 (2018). Google Scholar

13. 

Z. Zhang et al., “Tunable high-intensity electron bunch train production based on nonlinear longitudinal space charge oscillation,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 116 (18), 184801 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.184801 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2016). Google Scholar

14. 

H. Feng et al., “Generation of tunable 10-mJ-level terahertz pulses through nonlinear plasma wakefield modulation,” Phys. Rev. Appl., 15 (4), 044032 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.044032 PRAHB2 2331-7019 (2021). Google Scholar

15. 

Y. Liang et al., “Widely tunable electron bunch trains for the generation of high-power narrowband 1–10 THz radiation,” Nat. Photonics, 17 (3), 259 –263 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-022-01131-7 NPAHBY 1749-4885 (2023). Google Scholar

16. 

Y. Li and K. J. Kim, “Nonrelativistic electron bunch train for coherently enhanced terahertz radiation sources,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 92 (1), 014101 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2828337 APPLAB 0003-6951 (2008). Google Scholar

17. 

Y. Shen et al., “Tunable few-cycle and multicycle coherent terahertz radiation from relativistic electrons,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 107 (20), 204801 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.204801 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2011). Google Scholar

18. 

P. Musumeci et al., “Nonlinear longitudinal space charge oscillations in relativistic electron beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 106 (18), 184801 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.184801 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2011). Google Scholar

19. 

G. Zhao et al., “Strong electron density modulation with a low-power THz source for generating THz superradiant undulator radiation,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 22 (6), 060701 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.22.060701 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2019). Google Scholar

20. 

P. Muggli et al., “Generation of trains of electron microbunches with adjustable subpicosecond spacing,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 101 (5), 054801 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.054801 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2008). Google Scholar

21. 

Y. E. Sun et al., “Tunable subpicosecond electron-bunch-train generation using a transverse-to-longitudinal phase-space exchange technique,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 105 (23), 234801 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.234801 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2010). Google Scholar

22. 

H. Zhang et al., “Concept of a tunable source of coherent THz radiation driven by a plasma modulated electron beam,” Phys. Plasma, 25 (4), 043111 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5017551 (2018). Google Scholar

23. 

S. Antipov et al., “Experimental observation of energy modulation in electron beams passing through terahertz dielectric wakefield structures,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 108 (14), 144801 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.144801 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2012). Google Scholar

24. 

K. L. F. Bane and G. Stupakov, “Terahertz radiation from a pipe with small corrugations,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A: Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip., 677 67 –73 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2012.02.028 (2012). Google Scholar

25. 

S. Antipov et al., “Subpicosecond bunch train production for a tunable mJ level THz source,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 111 (13), 134802 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.134802 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2013). Google Scholar

26. 

G. Andonian et al., “Generation of ramped current profiles in relativistic electron beams using wakefields in dielectric structures,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 118 (5), 054802 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.054802 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2017). Google Scholar

27. 

F. Lemery et al., “Passive ballistic microbunching of nonultrarelativistic electron bunches using electromagnetic wakefields in dielectric-lined waveguides,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 122 (4), 044801 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.044801 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2019). Google Scholar

28. 

D. Xiang and G. Stupakov, “Enhanced tunable narrow-band THz emission from laser-modulated electron beams,” Phys. Rev. Spl. Top.-Accel. Beams, 12 (8), 080701 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.12.080701 (2009). Google Scholar

29. 

M. Dunning et al., “Generating periodic terahertz structures in a relativistic electron beam through frequency down-conversion of optical lasers,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 109 (7), 074801 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.074801 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2012). Google Scholar

30. 

Z. Wang et al., “Echo-enabled tunable terahertz radiation generation with a laser-modulated relativistic electron beam,” Phys. Rev. Spl. Top.-Accel. Beams, 17 (9), 090701 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.17.090701 (2014). Google Scholar

31. 

W. Lu et al., “A nonlinear theory for multidimensional relativistic plasma wave wakefields,” Phys. Plasma, 13 (5), 056709 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2203364 (2006). Google Scholar

32. 

W. Lu et al., “Nonlinear theory for relativistic plasma wakefields in the blowout regime,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 96 (16), 165002 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.165002 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2006). Google Scholar

33. 

C. Huang et al., “QuickPIC: a highly efficient fully parallelized pic code for plasma-based acceleration,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 46 (1), 190 –199 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/46/1/026 JPCSDZ 1742-6588 (2006). Google Scholar

34. 

W. An et al., “Recent development on open source QuickPIC,” in APS Division of Plasma Phys. Meeting Abstr., (2019). Google Scholar

36. 

B. van der Geer and M. de Loos, “The general particle tracer code: design, implementation and application,” (2003). https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/1982877/200111445.pdf Google Scholar

37. 

C. Tang et al., “Tsinghua Thomson scattering X-ray source,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A: Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip., 608 S70 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2009.05.088 (2009). Google Scholar

38. 

M. Ferrario et al., “Laser comb with velocity bunching: preliminary results at SPARC,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A: Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip., 637 (1), S43 –S46 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2010.02.018 (2011). Google Scholar

39. 

A. W. Chao et al., Handbook of Accelerator Physics and Engineering, World Scientific( (2023). Google Scholar

40. 

A. D. Brynes et al., “Beyond the limits of 1D coherent synchrotron radiation,” New J. Phys., 20 (7), 073035 https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aad21d NJOPFM 1367-2630 (2018). Google Scholar

41. 

S. Reiche, “Genesis 1.3: a fully 3D time-dependent FEL simulation code,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A: Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip., 429 (1), 243 –248 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00114-X (1999). Google Scholar

Biographies of the authors are not available.

CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE and CLP under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Hanqi Feng, Fang Liu, Lixin Yan, Wenhui Huang, Kaiyu Cui, Xue Feng, Wei Zhang, and Yidong Huang "Enhanced terahertz generation via plasma modulation on two bunches," Advanced Photonics Nexus 3(4), 046014 (31 July 2024). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.APN.3.4.046014
Received: 10 March 2024; Accepted: 12 June 2024; Published: 31 July 2024
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
Terahertz radiation

Plasma

Modulation

Plasma generation

Electron beams

Bubbles

Simulations

Back to Top