Terahertz (THz) radiation finds important applications in various fields, making the study of THz sources significant. Among different approaches, electron accelerator-based THz sources hold notable advantages in generating THz radiation with narrow bandwidth, high brightness, high peak power, and high repetition rate. To further improve the THz radiation energy, the bunching factor of the free electron bunch train needs to be increased. We propose and numerically reveal that, by adding an additional short-pulse drive beam before the main beam as the excitation source of nonlinear plasma wake, the bunching factor of the main beam can be further increased to |
1.IntroductionThe demand for electromagnetic waves in the terahertz (THz) range is significant, spanning various applications, such as molecular spectroscopy, compact electron acceleration, medical imaging, and security checking.1–4 Over the past two decades, remarkable advancements have been achieved in the development of diverse THz radiation sources. Notably, electron accelerator-based THz sources have garnered substantial global interest due to their potential to generate THz radiation with narrow bandwidth, high energy, exceptional brightness, and impressive repetition rates ranging from kilohertz to megahertz.5–7 Despite the existence of various techniques for generating narrowband THz radiation,8–10 the utilization of electron bunch trains holds immense potential for producing highly intense and narrowband THz radiation based on Smith–Purcell radiation,11 undulator radiation,12 etc. The crucial factor in achieving coherent THz radiation lies in the precise manipulation of the beam phase-space distribution, enabling the formation of microbunches with picosecond (ps) or even sub-picosecond spacing.13–15 This approach offers promising prospects for advancing the field of THz generation. The generation of the desired bunch train has been a subject of intense investigation, for example, directly modulating the drive laser,13,16–19 transforming transverse modulation to a longitudinal distribution,20,21 using self-modulation instability in a linear plasma wake,22 converting energy modulation induced by wakefields in dielectric-lined or corrugated waveguides to density bunching,23–27 and transforming laser-induced energy modulation to a density distribution.11,28–30 For the bunch train, the bunching factor , defined as with the beam current distribution and the modulation wave number , is used to reflect the coherence of the longitudinal density distribution of electron beams. The coherent THz radiation energy is proportional to the square of the bunching factor . Therefore, the larger , the stronger the radiation energy. However, in the above methods, even under conditions of theoretically ideal simulations, the bunching factor is limited to , which restricts the acquisition of higher radiation energy. An alternative method of inducing energy and density modulation in an electron beam is to utilize the plasma medium. Recently, the use of uniform plasma-based modulators has been proposed to generate ultrahigh peak-current ( level) electron bunch trains with tunable ps spacing and high bunching factors.14 In the scheme, a high-charge (several nC) and high-current electron beam traverses a uniform plasma section and initiates a periodic “sawtooth” nonlinear plasma wake when the beam density is higher than the plasma density. This interaction leads to energy gain or loss for electrons at different positions, creating a sawtooth-shaped energy modulation along the bunch. Subsequently, a magnetic compressor is employed to efficiently convert this energy modulation into beam density modulation, resulting in the formation of microbunches with an impressive bunching factor of .14 Although the scheme offers clear advantages, to excite a high-quality nonlinear plasma wakefield, the electron beam should be focused to a very small transverse size [ in root mean square (RMS)] and its current distribution is preferred to be a flattop distribution, which is hard to realize in practical experiments. Here, we propose a novel two-bunch scheme for the generation of high-power coherent THz radiation. In this scheme, an additional short-pulse drive beam is added before the main beam as the excitation source of nonlinear plasma wake. This innovative approach can significantly loosen the requirements on main beam parameters (transverse size, longitudinal current distribution, etc.) and improve the bunching factor to , thereby optimizing the energy conversion efficiency of THz generation. As passive modulation, compared with dielectric-lined or corrugated waveguide-based energy modulators, using plasma wakefield to implement energy modulation has unique advantages in tuning modulation frequency, avoiding radio-frequency (RF) breakdown, providing an ideal sawtooth energy modulation, etc. The nonlinear plasma wake has very good wakefield properties within the ion channel, including a constant longitudinal field in the transverse dimension and a uniform focusing gradient along the longitudinal dimension. These properties effectively preserve the energy spread and emittance of the beam slice. 2.Principles and MethodsAs shown in Fig. 1(a), two electron beams enter a uniform plasma sequentially. The first beam, referred to as the “drive beam,” is characterized by relatively low or moderate charge but high current () for its short bunch length (<ps). The drive beam boosts a brief duration and exceptionally high current, and even if its transverse size may be relatively large, its density significantly surpasses that of the surrounding plasma, resulting in an ideal sawtooth-shaped wakefield. The second beam, referred to as the “main beam,” features a relatively long bunch length () and low current. Following the drive beam in plasma that excites a strong nonlinear wakefield, the main beam would not only experience the linear wakefield produced by itself but also gain modulation from the nonlinear wakefield generated by the former. Given that the current/density of the drive beam is much higher than that of the main beam, the nonlinear wakefield excited by the drive beam dominates the energy modulation process while the linear wakefield self-excited by the main beam plays a little role; therefore, there are no stringent demands on the transverse size or current profile of the main beam. Then, a small magnetic chicane located next to the plasma section is used to detour the electron bunch, and the sawtooth energy modulation of the main beam is converted to a density distribution with a very high bunching factor. Since the two beams have slight differences in energy, their different motion paths and deflection angles in the chicane could be applied to block the drive beam and have the main beam enter the subsequent section for radiation by introducing a metal (such as tungsten) slit as an energy filter. To illustrate the key physics in the above scheme, a detailed theoretical analysis is carried out. For a uniform plasma section with density and a relativistic electron beam with density , length , and RMS spot size (transverse Gaussian profile), nonlinear plasma wakefields are excited and plasma bubbles are formed when .31 The shape of the excited bubble is represented by the trajectory of the innermost particle. The longitudinal wakefield is found to be proportional to the product of the local radius of the ion channel and the slope ,32 where with the light speed in vacuum and the electron beam moving direction .The normalized maximum radius of the ion channel is ,14 in which is the plasma wavenumber, is the normalized charge per unit length, is the electron charge, is the rest mass of the electron, is the vacuum dielectric constant, is the peak current of the beam, and is the Alfven current. In this case, the trajectory of the inner particles of the ion channel can be simplified as32 where the drive term in the beam region is and outside the beam region is 0. Normalized units are applied here with the lengths normalized to skin depth , densities to the plasma density , charges to the electron charge , and fields to the cold nonrelativistic wave-breaking limit .As the beam enters into the plasma section, a series of bubbles are excited along the propagating direction. In each bubble, we have at the maximum radius position , in which is the bubble number, and indicates the maximum radius position. Applying Taylor expansion at , we have and thus obtain andFrom Eq. (2), we have and thus the slope of at isSince the main beam is applied to generate THz radiation, the analysis focuses on its energy modulation. When the two beams enter the uniform plasma section, the drive beam moving ahead exists mainly at the first bubble, while the main beam exists at the second, third, fourth, and the following bubbles. Therefore, we focus on the field distributions of the second and the following bubbles. Since the beam current of the drive beam is much higher than that of the main beam, the radius of the first bubble is the largest, and is relatively small, namely, . Assuming (), the value of could be obtained through numerical simulations. Since the main beam for generating radiation exists in the second and the following bubbles, we focus on the field distributions in these bubbles. Taking the second bubble as an example, Eq. (7) is still applicable; that is, the slope of the longitudinal electric field is where , and .3.ResultsTo further demonstrate the practical validity of the above scheme, we show here a typical example through self-consistent three-dimensional (3D) simulations utilizing a set of thoroughly benchmarked codes. The propagation of the two beams within the uniform plasma is simulated using the particle-in-cell code QuickPIC.33–35 Subsequently, the macroparticles of the beam are imported into the general particle tracer (GPT) code,36 enabling comprehensive tracking of the beams’ six-dimensional (6D) phase-space dynamics in the chicane. In our simulations, the drive beam is characterized by a beam current of 2 kA, beam charge of 1 nC, and flattop current profile of 0.5 ps (). The main beam with the energy of 135 MeV has a beam current of , beam charge 1.5 nC, and 5 ps flattop current profile (). The simulation parameters are shown in Table 1 in detail. Two such electron beams with the above characteristics and a suitable time delay can be generated using typical photoinjectors together with the following injector linac sections. 18,37,38 Table 1Parameters of the two beams in the simulations.
The plasma density distribution after the two beams propagating into the plasma is shown in Fig. 1(b). Since the current of the drive beam is much higher than that of the main beam, the radius of the first bubble is the largest, and are relatively small. The excited longitudinal wakefield in plane and the on-axis lineout of clearly show the feature of a sawtooth waveform in Fig. 1(c). With the drive beam current of , we can have . In the second bubble, , (that is ), thus the slope of (normalized to ) is . In the simulation, as in Fig. 1(c), and the slope of is , which are both in good agreement with the theoretical results. A lead collimator is placed between the plasma and the chicane, leading to a prebunching effect. The electrons in the region of positive slope have a relatively large transverse momentum , which can be removed during further transport with the prebunching effect. Such an effect will further reduce the DC component after the chicane and increase the bunching factor. By assuming that electrons with can be removed, the charge-loss ratio is relatively low (). We then use the particle tracking code GPT to further track the beam 6D phase-space dynamics in the chicane. In the simulation, the represents the change in the average beam position along the beamline per unit change in the particle’s momentum,39 which is applied to quantify the dispersion effect in the chicane. Dependence of longitudinal position on momentum is mainly caused by transverse dispersion () in bending magnets, which results in different path lengths for particles with different momenta. The simulated value of “full compression” is ; the beam longitudinal phase space is shown in Fig. 2(a). The beam energy modulation is converted into density modulation, resulting in the microbunches with an ideal bunching factor. Each microbunch stands nearly upright, which leads to a high peak current. The corresponding current profile shown in Fig. 2(b) reveals that the bunch length of each microbunch reduces to (RMS) and the peak current reaches . Thus, the corresponding bunching factor at the fundamental and harmonic frequencies could be calculated and are shown in Fig. 2(c). The value reaches 0.94 at the fundamental frequency and over 0.5 at high harmonic frequencies, which is larger than those of previous methods with no stringent demands. Sending the bunch train through a helical undulator, the radiation at the THz frequency region could be emitted. With undulator period and the peak magnetic field , the undulator strength , and the radiation can be resonant at 1.13 THz (corresponding radiation wavelength with the plasma density ). As a longitudinally dispersive element, the undulator causes overcompression or debunching of a fully compressed electron beam and leads to a slight reduction in the bunching factor and thus the output THz radiation. To obtain a high average bunching factor within the undulator, the beam is undercompressed in the chicane to obtain a bunching factor of 0.85 at the entrance of the undulator. As the beam propagates in the undulator, it will be first further compressed to the full-compression and then overcompressed case. The simulation of the bunch trains passing through the undulator is carried out using the well-benchmarked code GENESIS,40,41 and the space charge effect is also included. As shown in Fig. 3, simulation results show that with a 5 m-long undulator, the emitted THz pulse energy can reach as high as 2.4 mJ. The radiation is also highly directional, which is of great advantage in advanced scientific explorations. When the beam charge increases, the energy increases and reaches a high level accordingly, since the bunching factor is above when loosening the requirements on the two bunches. Lowering the energy of the electron beam is beneficial for improving the energy conversion efficiency. Therefore, we further explored the feasibility of the scheme at lower electron energies. Reducing the energy of the dual bunch in the previous section to 50 MeV with other parameters unchanged, the simulated results of the beam are shown in Fig. 4. With the same plasma length (3.7 mm), the absolute value of energy modulation received by the electron beam is the same, but the relative energy spread is obviously increased [see Fig. 4(a); compared with that in Fig. 2(a)] due to the decrease of the initial energy. In Fig. 2(a), the longitudinal phase space is “rigid,” while in Fig. 4(a) there is an obvious curvature, which results from the nonlinear process of magnetic compression. When the relative energy spread increases, the nonlinearity of the beam longitudinal phase space becomes apparent. In this case, the bunching factor is 0.85 at the fundamental frequency. In order to reduce the influence of relative energy spread, we decrease the length of the uniform plasma. Figure 5(a) shows the beam phase space with a plasma length decreased to 2.7 mm. Compared with Fig. 4(a), the relative energy spread decreases, and the longitudinal phase space is more rigid. Figures 5(b) and 5(c) show the current distribution and bunching factor under different plasma lengths, with the red line indicating that the highest bunching factor reaches 0.9. Through simulations, radiation energy in the same order can still be obtained. Therefore, by reducing the length of the plasma, the energy spread of the beam can be reduced and the bunching factor could be improved through the magnetic compression process. With reduced plasma length and energy spread, the radiation energy could be further increased by 10%. 4.ConclusionIn conclusion, we propose and study an approach leveraging uniform plasma to sequentially modulate two bunches, aimed at enhancing THz radiation generation. Through theoretical analysis and comprehensive simulations, it is revealed that, by adding an additional short-pulse drive beam before the main beam as the excitation source of nonlinear plasma wake, the bunching factor of the main beam can be further increased to 0.94 even though with a relatively low charge, low current, and large-size electron beam. Consequently, significant strides have been made in boosting THz radiation energy while mitigating constraints, such as beam charge and transverse beam size. The findings of this research not only contribute to the scientific understanding of THz radiation generation but also pave the way for potential breakthroughs in the practical utilization of this valuable radiation. Code and Data AvailabilityAll data and codes in support of the findings of this paper are available from the authors upon request. AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2023YFB2806703) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. U22A6004, 62301294, and 11835004), and was funded by the National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Vacuum Electronics. ReferencesE. A. Nanni et al.,
“Terahertz-driven linear electron acceleration,”
Nat. Commun., 6
(1), 8486 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9486 NCAOBW 2041-1723
(2015).
Google Scholar
P. H. Siegel,
“Terahertz technology,”
IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., 50
(3), 910
–928 https://doi.org/10.1109/22.989974 IETMAB 0018-9480
(2002).
Google Scholar
M. Liu et al.,
“Terahertz-field-induced insulator-to-metal transition in vanadium dioxide metamaterial,”
Nature, 487
(7407), 345
–348 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11231
(2012).
Google Scholar
T. Kampfrath, K. Tanaka and K. Nelson,
“Resonant and on resonant control over matter and light by intense terahertz transients,”
Nat. Photonics, 7
(9), 680 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.184 NPAHBY 1749-4885
(2013).
Google Scholar
P. Kramer et al.,
“Enabling high repetition rate nonlinear THz science with a kilowatt-class sub-100 fs laser source,”
Opt. Express, 28 16951
–16967 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.389653 OPEXFF 1094-4087
(2020).
Google Scholar
J. Buldt et al.,
“Fiber laser-driven gas plasma-based generation of THz radiation with 50-mW average power,”
Appl. Phys. B, 126 2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-019-7353-2
(2020).
Google Scholar
G. Carr et al.,
“High-power terahertz radiation from relativistic electrons,”
Nature, 420 153
–156 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01175
(2002).
Google Scholar
A. S. Weling et al.,
“Generation of tunable narrow-band THz radiation from large aperture photoconducting antennas,”
Appl. Phys. Lett., 64
(2), 137
–139 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.111543 APPLAB 0003-6951
(1994).
Google Scholar
J. Y. Sohn et al.,
“Tunable terahertz generation using femtosecond pulse shaping,”
Appl. Phys. Lett., 81
(1), 13
–15 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1490140 APPLAB 0003-6951
(2002).
Google Scholar
S. Bielawski et al.,
“Tunable narrowband terahertz emission from mastered laser–electron beam interaction,”
Nat. Phys., 4
(5), 390
–393 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys916 NPAHAX 1745-2473
(2008).
Google Scholar
Z. Zhang et al.,
“Generation of high-power, tunable terahertz radiation from laser interaction with a relativistic electron beam,”
Phys. Rev. Spl. Top.-Accel. Beams, 20
(5), 050701 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.20.050701
(2017).
Google Scholar
Y. Liang et al.,
“Selective excitation and control of coherent terahertz Smith-Purcell radiation by high-intensity period-tunable train of electron micro-bunches,”
Appl. Phys. Lett., 113
(17), 171104 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5054583 APPLAB 0003-6951
(2018).
Google Scholar
Z. Zhang et al.,
“Tunable high-intensity electron bunch train production based on nonlinear longitudinal space charge oscillation,”
Phys. Rev. Lett., 116
(18), 184801 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.184801 PRLTAO 0031-9007
(2016).
Google Scholar
H. Feng et al.,
“Generation of tunable 10-mJ-level terahertz pulses through nonlinear plasma wakefield modulation,”
Phys. Rev. Appl., 15
(4), 044032 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.044032 PRAHB2 2331-7019
(2021).
Google Scholar
Y. Liang et al.,
“Widely tunable electron bunch trains for the generation of high-power narrowband 1–10 THz radiation,”
Nat. Photonics, 17
(3), 259
–263 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-022-01131-7 NPAHBY 1749-4885
(2023).
Google Scholar
Y. Li and K. J. Kim,
“Nonrelativistic electron bunch train for coherently enhanced terahertz radiation sources,”
Appl. Phys. Lett., 92
(1), 014101 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2828337 APPLAB 0003-6951
(2008).
Google Scholar
Y. Shen et al.,
“Tunable few-cycle and multicycle coherent terahertz radiation from relativistic electrons,”
Phys. Rev. Lett., 107
(20), 204801 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.204801 PRLTAO 0031-9007
(2011).
Google Scholar
P. Musumeci et al.,
“Nonlinear longitudinal space charge oscillations in relativistic electron beams,”
Phys. Rev. Lett., 106
(18), 184801 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.184801 PRLTAO 0031-9007
(2011).
Google Scholar
G. Zhao et al.,
“Strong electron density modulation with a low-power THz source for generating THz superradiant undulator radiation,”
Phys. Rev. Lett., 22
(6), 060701 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.22.060701 PRLTAO 0031-9007
(2019).
Google Scholar
P. Muggli et al.,
“Generation of trains of electron microbunches with adjustable subpicosecond spacing,”
Phys. Rev. Lett., 101
(5), 054801 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.054801 PRLTAO 0031-9007
(2008).
Google Scholar
Y. E. Sun et al.,
“Tunable subpicosecond electron-bunch-train generation using a transverse-to-longitudinal phase-space exchange technique,”
Phys. Rev. Lett., 105
(23), 234801 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.234801 PRLTAO 0031-9007
(2010).
Google Scholar
H. Zhang et al.,
“Concept of a tunable source of coherent THz radiation driven by a plasma modulated electron beam,”
Phys. Plasma, 25
(4), 043111 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5017551
(2018).
Google Scholar
S. Antipov et al.,
“Experimental observation of energy modulation in electron beams passing through terahertz dielectric wakefield structures,”
Phys. Rev. Lett., 108
(14), 144801 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.144801 PRLTAO 0031-9007
(2012).
Google Scholar
K. L. F. Bane and G. Stupakov,
“Terahertz radiation from a pipe with small corrugations,”
Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A: Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip., 677 67
–73 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2012.02.028
(2012).
Google Scholar
S. Antipov et al.,
“Subpicosecond bunch train production for a tunable mJ level THz source,”
Phys. Rev. Lett., 111
(13), 134802 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.134802 PRLTAO 0031-9007
(2013).
Google Scholar
G. Andonian et al.,
“Generation of ramped current profiles in relativistic electron beams using wakefields in dielectric structures,”
Phys. Rev. Lett., 118
(5), 054802 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.054802 PRLTAO 0031-9007
(2017).
Google Scholar
F. Lemery et al.,
“Passive ballistic microbunching of nonultrarelativistic electron bunches using electromagnetic wakefields in dielectric-lined waveguides,”
Phys. Rev. Lett., 122
(4), 044801 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.044801 PRLTAO 0031-9007
(2019).
Google Scholar
D. Xiang and G. Stupakov,
“Enhanced tunable narrow-band THz emission from laser-modulated electron beams,”
Phys. Rev. Spl. Top.-Accel. Beams, 12
(8), 080701 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.12.080701
(2009).
Google Scholar
M. Dunning et al.,
“Generating periodic terahertz structures in a relativistic electron beam through frequency down-conversion of optical lasers,”
Phys. Rev. Lett., 109
(7), 074801 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.074801 PRLTAO 0031-9007
(2012).
Google Scholar
Z. Wang et al.,
“Echo-enabled tunable terahertz radiation generation with a laser-modulated relativistic electron beam,”
Phys. Rev. Spl. Top.-Accel. Beams, 17
(9), 090701 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.17.090701
(2014).
Google Scholar
W. Lu et al.,
“A nonlinear theory for multidimensional relativistic plasma wave wakefields,”
Phys. Plasma, 13
(5), 056709 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2203364
(2006).
Google Scholar
W. Lu et al.,
“Nonlinear theory for relativistic plasma wakefields in the blowout regime,”
Phys. Rev. Lett., 96
(16), 165002 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.165002 PRLTAO 0031-9007
(2006).
Google Scholar
C. Huang et al.,
“QuickPIC: a highly efficient fully parallelized pic code for plasma-based acceleration,”
J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 46
(1), 190
–199 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/46/1/026 JPCSDZ 1742-6588
(2006).
Google Scholar
W. An et al.,
“Recent development on open source QuickPIC,”
in APS Division of Plasma Phys. Meeting Abstr.,
(2019). Google Scholar
, “QuickPIC open source,”
http://github.com/UCLA-Plasma-Simulation-Group/QuickPIC-OpenSource
(2001).
Google Scholar
B. van der Geer and M. de Loos,
“The general particle tracer code: design, implementation and application,”
(2003). https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/1982877/200111445.pdf Google Scholar
C. Tang et al.,
“Tsinghua Thomson scattering X-ray source,”
Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A: Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip., 608 S70 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2009.05.088
(2009).
Google Scholar
M. Ferrario et al.,
“Laser comb with velocity bunching: preliminary results at SPARC,”
Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A: Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip., 637
(1), S43
–S46 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2010.02.018
(2011).
Google Scholar
A. W. Chao et al., Handbook of Accelerator Physics and Engineering, World Scientific(
(2023). Google Scholar
A. D. Brynes et al.,
“Beyond the limits of 1D coherent synchrotron radiation,”
New J. Phys., 20
(7), 073035 https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aad21d NJOPFM 1367-2630
(2018).
Google Scholar
S. Reiche,
“Genesis 1.3: a fully 3D time-dependent FEL simulation code,”
Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A: Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip., 429
(1), 243
–248 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00114-X
(1999).
Google Scholar
|