In this article [J. Electron. Imaging 27(5), 051230 (2018), doi: 10.1117/1.JEI.27.5.051230], Table 1 on page 2 reports incorrect information about the software Masquerade. The correct table is as follows:
Table 1
Comparison of GRAPHJ with Graphlog and Masquerade. A, automatic; M, manual; NA, not available.
| GRAPHJ | Graphlog | Masquerade |
---|
Search of text lines | A | NA | A |
Search of words | A | NA | A |
Character search | A | NA | A |
Search of writing areas | A | NA | A |
Height characters | A | M | A |
Width characters | A | M | A |
Distance between words | A | M | A |
Distance between characters | A | M | A |
The information above is reported in the following references describing the details of Masquarade, which have been added to the paper as Refs. 28, 29, and 26, respectively:
– A. Marcelli, A. Parziale, and C. De Stefano, “Quantitative evaluation of features for forensic handwriting examination,” in IEEE 13th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), pp. 1266–1271 (2015).
– A. Parziale, A. Santoro, A. Marcelli, A. P. Rizzo, C. Molinari, A. G. Cappuzzo, and F. Fontana, “An interactive tool for forensic handwriting examination,” in IEEE 14th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (ICFHR), pp. 440–445 (2014).
– NITe, Masquerade, http://www.nitesrl.com/products/masquerade/ (12 June 2018).
All online versions of the article were corrected on 19 October 2018. The article appears correctly in print.