29 April 2019 Line roughness estimation and Poisson denoising in scanning electron microscope images using deep learning
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
We propose the use of deep supervised learning for the estimation of line edge roughness (LER) and line width roughness (LWR) in low-dose scanning electron microscope (SEM) images. We simulate a supervised learning dataset of 100,800 SEM rough line images constructed by means of the Thorsos method and the ARTIMAGEN library developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. We also devise two separate deep convolutional neural networks called SEMNet and EDGENet, each of which has 17 convolutional layers, 16 batch normalization layers, and 16 dropout layers. SEMNet performs the Poisson denoising of SEM images, and it is trained with a dataset of simulated noisy-original SEM image pairs. EDGENet directly estimates the edge geometries from noisy SEM images, and it is trained with a dataset of simulated noisy SEM image-edge array pairs. SEMNet achieved considerable improvements in peak signal-to-noise ratio as well as the best LER/LWR estimation accuracy compared with standard image denoisers. EDGENet offers excellent LER and LWR estimation as well as roughness spectrum estimation.
© 2019 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) 1932-5150/2019/$25.00 © 2019 SPIE
Narendra Chaudhary, Serap A. Savari, and Sai S. Yeddulapalli "Line roughness estimation and Poisson denoising in scanning electron microscope images using deep learning," Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS 18(2), 024001 (29 April 2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMM.18.2.024001
Received: 15 January 2019; Accepted: 2 April 2019; Published: 29 April 2019
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 22 scholarly publications and 1 patent.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Scanning electron microscopy

Neural networks

Line width roughness

Denoising

Line edge roughness

Machine learning

Monte Carlo methods

Back to Top