Validation of automated cloud top phase algorithms: distinguishing between cirrus clouds and snow in a priori analyses of AVHRR imagery

Keith D. Hutchison; Brian J. Etherton; Phillip C. Topping

doi:10.1117/1.601366

1 June 1997 Validation of automated cloud top phase algorithms: distinguishing between cirrus clouds and snow in a priori analyses of AVHRR imagery

Keith D. Hutchison, Brian J. Etherton, Phillip C. Topping

Author Affiliations +

Optical Engineering, Vol. 36, Issue 6, (June 1997). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.601366

Quantitative assessments on the performance of automated cloud analysis algorithms require the creation of highly accurate, manual cloud, no cloud (CNC) images from multispectral meteorological satellite data. In general, the methodology to create these a priori analyses for the evaluation of cloud detection algorithms is relatively straightforward, although the task becomes more complicated when little spectral signature is evident between a cloud and its background, as appears to be the case in advanced very high resolution radiometer (AVHRR) imagery when thin cirrus is present over snow-covered surfaces. In addition, complex procedures are needed to help the analyst distinguish between water and ice cloud tops to construct the manual cloud top phase analyses and to ensure that inaccuracies in automated cloud detection are not propagated into the results of the cloud classification algorithm. Procedures are described that enhance the researcher’s ability to (1) distinguish between thin cirrus clouds and snow-covered surfaces in daytime AVHRR imagery, (2) construct accurate a priori cloud top phase manual analyses, and (3) quantitatively validate the performance of both automated cloud detection and cloud top phase classification algorithms. The methodology uses all AVHRR spectral bands, including a band derived from the daytime 3.7-?m channel, which has proven most valuable for discriminating between thin cirrus clouds and snow. It is concluded that while the 1.6-?m band is needed to distinguish between snow and water clouds in daytime data, the 3.7-?m channel remains essential during the daytime to differentiate between thin ice clouds and snow. Unfortunately this capability that may be lost if the 3.7-?m data switches to a nighttimeonly transmission with the launch of future National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) satellites.

Citation Download Citation

Keith D. Hutchison, Brian J. Etherton, and Phillip C. Topping "Validation of automated cloud top phase algorithms: distinguishing between cirrus clouds and snow in a priori analyses of AVHRR imagery," Optical Engineering 36(6), (1 June 1997). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.601366

Published: 1 June 1997

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available