In diabetic kidney disease (DKD), podocyte depletion, and the subsequent migration of parietal epithelial cells (PECs) to the tuft, is a precursor to progressive glomerular damage, but the limitations of brightfield microscopy currently preclude direct pathological quantitation of these cells. Here we present an automated approach to podocyte and PEC detection developed using kidney sections from mouse model emulating DKD, stained first for Wilms’ Tumor 1 (WT1) (podocyte and PEC marker) by immunofluorescence, then post-stained with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS). A generative adversarial network (GAN)-based pipeline was used to translate these PAS-stained sections into WT1-labeled IF images, enabling in silico label-free podocyte and PEC identification in brightfield images. Our method detected WT1-positive cells with high sensitivity/specificity (0.87/0.92). Additionally, our algorithm performed with a higher Cohen’s kappa (0.85) than the average manual identification by three renal pathologists (0.78). We propose that this pipeline will enable accurate detection of WT1- positive cells in research applications.
Histologic examination of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) is critical to determine the extent of irreversible kidney injury in renal disease. The current clinical standard involves pathologist’s visual assessment of IFTA, which is prone to inter-observer variability. To address this diagnostic variability, we designed two case studies (CSs), including seven pathologists, using HistomicsTK- a distributed system developed by Kitware Inc. (Clifton Park, NY). Twenty-five whole slide images (WSIs) were classified into a training set of 21 and a validation set of four. The training set was composed of seven unique subsets, each provided to an individual pathologist along with four common WSIs from the validation set. In CS 1, all pathologists individually annotated IFTA in their respective slides. These annotations were then used to train a deep learning algorithm to computationally segment IFTA. In CS 2, manual and computational annotations from CS 1 were first reviewed by the annotators to improve concordance of IFTA annotation. Both the manual and computational annotation processes were then repeated as in CS1. The inter-observer concordance in the validation set was measured by Krippendorff’s alpha (KA). The KA for the seven pathologists in CS1 was 0.62 with CI [0.57, 0.67], and after reviewing each other’s annotations in CS2, 0.66 with CI [0.60, 0.72]. The respective CS1 and CS2 KA were 0.58 with CI [0.52, 0.64] and 0.63 with CI [0.56, 0.69] when including the deep learner as an eighth annotator. These results suggest that our designed annotation framework refines agreement of spatial annotation of IFTA and demonstrates a human-AI approach to significantly improve the development of computational models.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.