Near ground surface turbulence measurements and validation: a comparison between different systems

Chensheng Wu; Daniel A. Paulson; Miranda Van Iersel; Joseph Coffaro; Melissa Beason; Christopher Smith; Robert F. Crabbs; Ronald Phillips; Larry Andrews; Christopher C. Davis

doi:10.1117/12.2322723

18 September 2018 Near ground surface turbulence measurements and validation: a comparison between different systems

Chensheng Wu, Daniel A. Paulson, Miranda Van Iersel, Joseph Coffaro, Melissa Beason, Christopher Smith, Robert F. Crabbs, Ronald Phillips, Larry Andrews, Christopher C. Davis

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 10770, Laser Communication and Propagation through the Atmosphere and Oceans VII; 107700K (2018) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2322723
Event: SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications, 2018, San Diego, California, United States

Abstract

Recently, the number of optical systems that operate along near horizontal paths within a few meters of the ground has increased rapidly. Examples are LIDAR or optical sensors imbedded in a vehicle, long range surveillance or optical communication systems, a LIFI network, new weather monitoring stations, as well as directed energy systems for defense purposes. Near ground turbulence distortion for optical waves used in those systems cannot be well described by conventional turbulence and beam propagation theory. Phenomena such as anisotropy, micro mirage effects, a temporal negative relation between diurnal dips and altitude, and condensation induced measurement errors are frequently involved. As a result, there is a high risk of defective designs or even failures in those optical systems if the near ground turbulence effects are not well considered. To illustrate such risk, we make C_n² measurements by different approaches and cross compare them with associated working principles. By demonstrating the reasons for mismatched C_n² results, we point out a few guidelines regarding how to use the general anisotropy theorem and the risk of ignoring it. Our conclusions can be further supported by an advanced plenoptic sensor that provides continuous wavefront data.

Conference Presentation

Citation Download Citation

Chensheng Wu, Daniel A. Paulson, Miranda Van Iersel, Joseph Coffaro, Melissa Beason, Christopher Smith, Robert F. Crabbs, Ronald Phillips, Larry Andrews, and Christopher C. Davis "Near ground surface turbulence measurements and validation: a comparison between different systems", Proc. SPIE 10770, Laser Communication and Propagation through the Atmosphere and Oceans VII, 107700K (18 September 2018); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2322723

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available