Presentation
15 February 2021 Mammographic density, 2D vs 3D methods: quantitative analysis of difference
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Mammographic quantitative breast density (QBD), the ratio of fibroglandular tissue to whole breast volume, is known to be important for risk assessment for breast cancer. Most methods are based on 2D projections, though some use MRI. We show two methods for determining QBD from 3D ultrasound tomographic (UT) images, their equivalence and superiority over other methods of estimation. False assignments to breast density can occur if projection methods are used. A sigmoidal function is fit using a log likelihood maximization and the QBD from MRI images is compared with QBD as calculated from 3D UT showing strong correlation.
Conference Presentation
© (2021) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
James W. Wiskin, John Klock, Martin Cwikla, Sanghyeb Lee, and Bilal Malik "Mammographic density, 2D vs 3D methods: quantitative analysis of difference", Proc. SPIE 11602, Medical Imaging 2021: Ultrasonic Imaging and Tomography, 116020E (15 February 2021); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2581964
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
Breast

Quantitative analysis

Tissues

Breast cancer

Magnetic resonance imaging

Mammography

Superposition

Back to Top