Using virtual clinical trials to assess objective image quality metrics in the task of microcalcification localization in digital mammography

Lucas E. Soares; Lucas R. Borges; Bruno Barufaldi; Andrew D. A. Maidment; Marcelo A. C. Vieira

doi:10.1117/12.2625745

13 July 2022 Using virtual clinical trials to assess objective image quality metrics in the task of microcalcification localization in digital mammography

Lucas E. Soares, Lucas R. Borges, Bruno Barufaldi, Andrew D. A. Maidment, Marcelo A. C. Vieira

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 12286, 16th International Workshop on Breast Imaging (IWBI2022); 1228603 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2625745
Event: Sixteenth International Workshop on Breast Imaging, 2022, Leuven, Belgium

Abstract

Many works have investigated methods to assess the quality of mammography images using objective image quality metrics. However, few studies have evaluated the ability of these metrics to predict the performance of human observers on specific tasks related to mammographic examination that are highly dependent on image quality. The propose of this work is to evaluate the quality of digital mammography acquired at a range of radiation doses through a set of objective metrics and to compare the results with the performance of human observers in the task of locating microcalcification clusters in these images. A dataset of 100 synthetic mammograms was simulated using a virtual clinical trials software. Microcalcification clusters of different sizes and contrasts were computationally inserted into the images. Acquisitions with five different radiation doses were simulated using a noise injection method proposed in a previous work. Four medical physicists with experience in analysis of mammographic images participated in the microcalcification cluster localization tests. The quality of digital mammography images was assessed considering nine well-known objective metrics. The metrics were calculated on both the raw data (DICOM ‘for processing’ tag) and the processed images (DICOM ‘for presentation’ tag). Finally, the association between readers performance and image quality index was conducted by calculating the percentage variation of all metrics as a function of radiation dose, taking the standard dose as a reference. Although the Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) and Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) are the most used in the literature, our results showed that Quality Index based on Local Variance (QILV) is the objective metric that best describes the behavior of human visual perception with the variation of radiation dose in digital mammography.

Citation Download Citation

Lucas E. Soares, Lucas R. Borges, Bruno Barufaldi, Andrew D. A. Maidment, and Marcelo A. C. Vieira "Using virtual clinical trials to assess objective image quality metrics in the task of microcalcification localization in digital mammography", Proc. SPIE 12286, 16th International Workshop on Breast Imaging (IWBI2022), 1228603 (13 July 2022); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2625745

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members: $17.00

Non-members: $21.00 ADD TO CART

PROCEEDINGS
8 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Get copyright permission Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace

KEYWORDS

Image quality

Image processing

Digital mammography

Signal to noise ratio

Mammography

Image analysis

Clinical trials

Show All Keywords

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years