Open Access Paper
17 October 2022 Material decomposition from unregistered dual kV data using the cOSSCIR algorithm
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 12304, 7th International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography; 123042F (2022) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2647034
Event: Seventh International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography (ICIFXCT 2022), 2022, Baltimore, United States
Abstract
Dual-kV is a spectral CT modality that is currently available clinically, which traditionally employs energy integrating detectors, and in some cases acquire spectral data that is unregistered. A spectral method developed for photon-counting detectors, the constrained one-step spectral CT image reconstruction method (cOSSCIR), is designed to perform material decomposition directly from a set of spectral measurements. As such, the spectral sinograms need not be registered. Within the framework of cOSSCIR, dual-kV data is just two-window spectral CT. Furthermore, reconstructing unregistered data, such as that acquired by fast kV switching and slow kV switching systems, provides a potential extension of sOSSCIR to reconstructing clinical data. In this investigation we demonstrate cOSSCIR on unregistered dual-kV protocols using simulations and experimental phantom studies. Our results suggest that cOSSCIR can accurately recover the basis material maps using slow- and rapid-kV data compared to fully registered reconstructions.

1.

INTRODUCTION

The constrained one-step spectral CT Image Reconstruction method (cOSSCIR) has been developed to estimate basis material maps directly from spectral CT data.1,8 cOSSCIR includes modeling of polyenergetic x-ray transmission, which can prevent beam hardening artifacts. Also, constraints can be placed on the basis material maps to stabilize the material decomposition inversion. The cOSSCIR framework has been investigated for spectral data from photon counting detectors. Recently, preliminary work has applied cOSSCIR to dual energy CT using an integrating detector model, where the dual energy problem is modeled in the cOSSCIR framework as a two-window spectral CT problem with significant overlap between the acquisition spectra. Previous work assumed the spectral data are fully registered (i.e., all spectral measurements are collected for each ray), as is generally the case with current photon-counting detector technologies. However, clinical dual energy diagnostic CT or cone-beam CT data may be acquired using Rapid- or Slow-kV acquisitions, resulting in unregistered spectral CT data. Typically, unregistered dual kV acquisitions are reconstructed by a two-step approach that first reconstructs CT images from each spectra and then performs image-domain material decomposition. However, such approaches cannot take advantage of polyenergetic modeling and are susceptible to beam hardening artifacts. One advantage of one-step direct inversion material decomposition methods such as cOSSCIR is that polyenergetic transmission can be modeled while the spectral data need not be registered. This study investigates the application of cOSSCIR to unregistered, dual energy acquisitions. First, an inverse crime simulation using a pelvic phantom was performed to determine whether the cOSSCIR optimization algorithm converges for the case of unregistered data. Our results demonstrate that convergence is possible for the Slow- and Rapid-kV, dual energy, problem using cOSSCIR. We further demonstrate the approach on a preliminary experimental dataset.

2.

PURPOSE

The goal of this study is to investigate the use of cOSSCIR on unregistered dual kV data, such as that acquired by Rapid- or Slow-kV switching acquisition. Specifically, this investigation will focus on inverse-crime studies and experimental reconstructions to establish the feasibility of using cOSSCIR on unregistered dual-kV data.

3.

METHODS

The cOSSCIR algorithm is designed to solve the concave-convex optimization problem,13

00088_PSISDG12304_123042F_page_2_1.jpg

where the objective is to find the optimal basis material images 00088_PSISDG12304_123042F_page_2_2.jpg that minimizes

00088_PSISDG12304_123042F_page_2_3.jpg

where DTPL is the Transmission data discrepancy derived from a Poisson likelihood (TPL). An anisotropic penalty was applied for the proceeding studies. The data model utilized by the method is

00088_PSISDG12304_123042F_page_2_4.jpg

where ĉωℓ represents the mean photon counts along a ray in energy window w. The variable Nwℓ represents the number of counts along ray in energy window w in the absence of an object, and Swℓi is the normalized x-ray energy spectrum. Pℓk is the x-ray projection operator. Finally, μmi represents the attenuation of material m at energy Ei. This one-step direct inversion2,5,6 method for CT has been investigated for the photon counting problem. The method was found to be more stable than traditional two-step approaches as it utilizes all rays in the reconstruction, and places constraints on the basis images xkm directly. In the one-step approach, the spectral measurements need not be registered, and cOSSCIR may potentially be applied to dual energy CT.7Dual energy CT, therefore, presents a unique opportunity to test cOSSCIR on the unregistered reconstruction problem. In the case of dual energy CT, the spectral model requires minimal modification to account for an energy integrating detector. The spectra Swℓi may be replaced by

00088_PSISDG12304_123042F_page_2_5.jpg

where βwℓ represents the detector gain along the transmission path in energy window w. The effect of unregistered data was investigated by simulating data from a pelvis phantom, consisting of a bone and water basis material maps, as shown in Fig. 1. Using a polyenergetic x-ray transmission model,8 projections at 80 and 140 kV data were simulated using realistic x-ray spectra. One simulation generated fully registered noiseless data using 256 equally spaced views for each energy. A Rapid-kV protocol was simulated by subsampling the fully sampled dataset so that the 80 kV data used the even view angles and the 140 kV data used the odd view angles. Likewise, a Slow-kV protocol was simulated by dividing the fully sampled data into blocks of 10 consecutive views, where each block of 10 views alternated between the 80 and 140 kV data. For comparison, 128-view, registered data, was also simulated by subsampling the fully sampled data, using the even view angles for each kV.

Figure 1.

Pelvis phantom; (a) The bone basis material map, and (b) the water basis material map.

00088_PSISDG12304_123042F_page_2_6.jpg

For all simulations, data were reconstructed using the cOSSCIR framework using the same x-ray transmission model that was used to simulate the data. During the reconstructions, two error metrics were monitored with iteration; the Root-Mean Squared-Error (RMSE) between the phantom basis images and the basis map estimates, and the TPL between the measured data and the modeled data.

Additionally, Dual-kV data was obtained from an experimental micro-CT system using a high resolution flat panel detector (Varian PaxScan 2520 DX) and a micro-focal x-ray source (Hamamatsu 9181-02). A cylindrical phantom with PMMA, Polystyrene, and Teflon inserts was imaged, as pictured in Fig. 2. For each phantom, fully registered projections were acquired from 500 equally spaced view angles using 80 and 130 kV.

Figure 2.

Rod phantom consisting of PMMA, LDPE, and Teflon

00088_PSISDG12304_123042F_page_3_1.jpg

As in the inverse-crime studies, a Rapid-kV-switching acquisition was simulated by reconstructing from only 250 views for each spectra, with the spectra alternating across angle. For each subsampled dataset, the 80 and 130 kV sinograms were offset by a single view angle. Likewise, to further test the method, Slow-kV-switching data was subsampled from the registered data by alternating between the 80 and 130 kV sinograms every 10 consecutive views. Reconstructions were then performed using the cOSSCIR algorithm using Aluminum and PMMA as the basis materials. Reconstructions of the fully sampled data and registered data using 128 views/kV were performed for comparison. For each basis material image, the mean value in the LDPE, PMMA, and Teflon regions were measured. The percent error was taken between the mean measurements and the predicted ground truth material decomposition values obtained from the XCOM NIST database.4

4.

RESULTS

cOSSCIR was performed on the noiseless data to investigate the effect of unregistered data on the reconstructions, and the resulting difference images for each material map are shown in Fig. 3 for 105 iterations. The top row shows the bone difference images and the bottom row shows the water basis images. Columns (c) and (d) show the results for the Rapid- and Slow-kV reconstructions, respectively. The difference images for the fully sampled data and the 128-view registered data are shown in columns (a) and (b) for comparison.

Figure 3.

Difference images for the pelvis phantom reconstructions for (a) Fully Sampled (registered) data using 256 views/kV, (b) Registered data using 128 views/kV, (c) Rapid-kV, (d) Slow-kV. The top row shows the difference images in the bone basis, and the bottom row shows the difference images in the water basis.

00088_PSISDG12304_123042F_page_4_1.jpg

As indicated by the small errors, the basis images are recovered well for the unregistered 128 views/kV in Fig. 3(c-d), although the errors were larger than the registered data in Fig. 3(a-b) after 105 iterations. The algorithm performance was further evaluated by monitoring the data error and basis image error with iteration, and are plotted in Fig. 4.

Figure 4.

(a) Data error, (b) RMSE for the bone basis image, (c) RMSE for the water basis image.

00088_PSISDG12304_123042F_page_4_2.jpg

As in the case of the reconstructions, the basis image error indicate good recovery after 105 iterations. The RMSE between the phantom and basis images suggest the registered and unregistered reconstructions are approaching the same solution. More iterations are required, in the case of the unregistered data, before the image RMSE approaches the same values as the registered reconstructions. Although the data error is decreasing with iteration in Fig. 4(a), in general, the TPL also indicates more iterations were required for Rapid- and Slow- kV switching, suggesting there is a penalty to using fewer projections per spectra compared to the fully registered case. An interesting aspect of these unregistered inverse-crime studies was convergence to a solution was only observed using μ-preconditioning,1 where the material attenuation energy functions μ(E) were orthogonalized. μ-preconditioning was not required for convergence on the registered data, but was used in the results presented above.

Experimental data was also reconstructed as a preliminary demonstration cOSSCIR applied to dual-kV data. 500 view dual energy data were acquired, then unregistered Rapid- and Slow-kV data were simulated by applying masks to the fully registered data for a total of 256 views/kV. A 256 views/kV registered dataset was also constructed from the 500 view acquisition. The fully sampled dataset was also reconstructed for comparison. Results for each of the reconstructions are shown in Fig. 5 using Aluminum and PMMA as the basis materials for 1000 iterations. μ-preconditioning was also used to perform all reconstructions. Compared to the registered results in Fig. 5, the recovered Rapid- and Slow-kV PMMA basis images and virtual mono-energetic images are quite similar. There are noticeable ray artifacts in the Rapid- and Slow-kV Aluminum basis images. However, these appear to be largely in areas of the image where Aluminum has limited contribution.

Figure 5.

Reconstructions using (a) Fully Sampled (registered) data using 500 views/kV, (b) Registered data using 250 views/kV, (c) Rapid-kV, and (d) Slow-kV data. The columns of each subfigure display the Aluminum, PMMA, and the 50 keV mono-energetic image.

00088_PSISDG12304_123042F_page_5_1.jpg

Material quantification was performed on the LDPE, PMMA, and Teflon regions of the phantom. The percent errors between the recovered grayscale values and their ground truth for each basis are shown in Table 1. The recovered material vectors are nearly identical for the registered and Rapid-kV reconstructions, demonstrating that unregistered acquisition does not impact quantitative accuracy.

Table 1.

% ErrorImageLDPEPMMATeflon
Fully SampledAL35.28-0.453
 PMMA4.6354.2001.341
 50 keV0.3350.3350.791
RegisteredAL39.91-0.291
 PMMA4.8634.1001.267
 50 keV0.3140.0570.876
Rapid-kVAL53.77-2.685
 PMMA6.3646.3901.857
 50 keV0.0060.4990.276
Slow-kVAL53.77-3.429
 PMMA6.5706.4002.001
 50 keV0.0670.4960.316

5.

NEW AND BREAKTHROUGH WORK TO BE PRESENTED

This is the first demonstration and application of cOSSCIR on unregistered dual-kV data.

6.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary results demonstrate the application of the one-step cOSSCIR algorithm to unregistered data. The inverse-crime studies demonstrate a challenging reconstruction problem, compared to reconstructing registered data. More iterations and orthogonalized material attenuation energy functions are required for basis image recovery. Our results suggest this may be due to using fewer views per spectra. Finally, the inverse-crime results were extended to experimental unregistered dual-kV data using a physical rod phantom. The results demonstrate that the cOSSCIR may also be applied to experimental, unregistered, dual-kV data. Furthermore, the unregistered data appears to have minimal impact on material basis quantification using 256 views/kV.

REFERENCES

[1] 

R.F. Barber, and E.Y. Sidky, “MOCCA: Mirrored Convex/Concave Optimization for Nonconvex Composite Functions,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17 (144), 1 –51 (2016). Google Scholar

[2] 

R.F. Barber, and E.Y. Sidky, T.G. Schmidt, “An algorithm for constrained one-step inversion of spectral CT data,” Phys. Med. Biol., 61 (10), 3784 –3818 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/61/10/3784 Google Scholar

[3] 

R.F. Barber, and E.Y. Sidky, “Convergence for nonconvex ADMM, with applications to CT imaging,” Google Scholar

[4] 

M.J. Berger, J.H. Hubbell, S.M. Seltzer, J. Chang, J.S. Coursey, R. Sukumar, D.S. Zucker, and K. Olsen, “National Institute of Standards and Technology,” XCOM: Photon Cross Section Database (version 1.5), (2010) http://physics.nist.gov/xcom Google Scholar

[5] 

C. Cai, T. Rodet, S. Legoupil, A. Mohammad-Djafari, “A full-spectral Bayesian reconstruction approach based on the material decomposition model applied in dual-energy computed tomography,” Med Phys, 40 (11.), (2013). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4820478 Google Scholar

[6] 

I.A. Elbakri, J.A. Fessler, “Statistical Image Reconstruction for Polyenergetic X-Ray Computed Tomography,” IEEE Trans. on Med. Imaging, 21 (2), 89 –99 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/42.993128 Google Scholar

[7] 

W. Huh, J.A. Fessler, “Model-based image reconstruction for dual-energy X-ray CT with fast KVP switching,” Proc. Int. Symp. IEEE Biomed. Imag., 326 –329 (2009). Google Scholar

[8] 

T.G. Schmidt, R.F. Barber, and E.Y. Sidky, “A Spectral CT Method to Directly Estimate Basis Material Maps From Experimental Photon-Counting Data,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 36 (9), 1808 –18 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2017.2696338 Google Scholar

[9] 

T.G. Schmidt, R.F. Barber, and E.Y. Sidky, “Spectral CT metal artifact reduction using weighted masking and a one step direct inversion reconstruction algorithm,” in Proceedings of the SPIE, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2550337 Google Scholar
© (2022) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Benjamin M. Rizzo, Emil Y. Sidky, and Taly Gilat Schmidt "Material decomposition from unregistered dual kV data using the cOSSCIR algorithm", Proc. SPIE 12304, 7th International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography, 123042F (17 October 2022); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2647034
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Dual energy imaging

Image restoration

X-ray computed tomography

Spectral computed tomography

RELATED CONTENT


Back to Top