|
1.ARCHITECTURE AND TECHNICAL DESCRIPTIONAstrix NS, the newcomer in the Astrix family with more than 6 million hours of cumulated successful flight history in orbit, arises from the needs of the new compact satellite platforms for small, light, low-power, and cost-efficient equipment: 100 x 100 x 100 mm, 1.4 kg and 7 W (see figure 1). It is qualified for a large range of missions, including the demanding GEO 15 years + electric orbit rising. Astrix NS is a compact solid state 3-axis gyroscope with shared communication and power electronic boards. Its optical architecture corresponds to the architecture of iXblue high performances FOG that has been improved for more than 25 years [4] [5]. It is available at a competitive price thanks to the use of COTS EEE parts that are carefully space-qualified. For Astrix NS, this critical activity of space qualification of the components is undertaken by Airbus Defence & Space. It guarantees a high reliability for all space environments including severe levels of radiations. Astrix NS reuses many materials and components from the Astrix family that have demonstrated their reliability for space use. It is especially true for the optical part of the gyroscope: the same rad-hard fibers designed and manufactured by iXblue [2], a compact version of the same optical components. The patented core closed feedback loop is the same as in all iXblue products. The coil diameter was reduced to 40mm ensuring high performances while keeping the overall system very compact. Astrix NS consists of two main parts, as illustrated in Figure 2 with the green-dashed boxes: Each of them is composed of an optical fiber coil ended by an integrated optical circuit (IOC). These Sagnac interferometers measure the rotation rate around the fiber optic coil axis. The 3 Sagnac interferometers are arranged on a symmetrical pyramid with orthogonal sensitive axis. This architecture is similar to Astrix 1090 and also to iXblue inertial systems for launchers. This solid heritage guarantees a very good robustness to vibrations and shocks. This pyramidal architecture also ensures a homogeneous behavior of the three sensors to mechanical and thermal variations.
These two parts are mechanically assembled in one shielding case (see Figure 1). To offer a compact and reliable FOG with the highest cost/performances ratio on the market, iXblue reuses the bricks that made the Astrix series successful and combines them with a COTS approach for the EEE components. This approach was presented at the AAS GN&C conference [3]. Table 1.Astrix NS main inertial performances
Table 2.Astrix NS main features
The characteristics of Astrix NS make it a highly versatile gyroscope that has been designed to fit both AOCS propagation during an extended attitude sensor blackout, pointing accuracy and high-speed fine guidance for agile spacecrafts. 2.ASTRIX NS’ ANGULAR ACCURACYFor Astrix NS, the angular knowledge error is mainly due to the angular random walk (ARW) noise as there is negligible Rate Random Walk (RRW) and Angular White Noise (AWN) as can be seen in Figure 3 with a linear Allan variance from 1mHz to 250 Hz. It allows real-time analysis of reaction wheel and cryocooler induced microvibrations. Signal latency is expected under 2 milliseconds which is compatible with high frequency LOS loops. In this paper, we present the pointing measurement results for Astrix NS standard version i.e. with a 5 m °/√h ARW. For the high performance Astrix NS (2.5 m°/√h ARW), the results would be twice better. It will be demonstrated and published in a future paper. The Astrix NS short time angular accuracy evolves roughly as the square root of time, as can be seen in Figure 4 with the black bold curve. If this experiment is repeated several times, for each duration, we observe a nearly gaussian distribution of angular error as can be seen in Figure 5. To monitor more easily the evolution of the distribution through time we plot the distribution values at the 10th, 50th, 90th and 99,7th percentiles as shown on Figure 6. In the representation of Figure 6, theoretically perfect systems with only pure white noise would results in straight parallel lines (dashed lines on Figure 6). A spectral anomaly in the noise spectrum or an electronic defect in the gyroscope would cause the temporal evolution to display bumps and peaks. In Astrix NS case, we don’t observe any significant and annoying bumps which demonstrates that the design is sound. The really meaningful error is the three-dimensional angular error which is a combination of the three orthogonal physical sensors. The noise of the three fiber gyroscope axes of Astrix NS are uncorrelated which is a favorable case for better three-dimensional performances. For uncorrelated variables, the three gaussian distributions of pointing performances combine according to a third order Chi Square Law, squeezing the error distribution of the real three-dimensional error. On Figure 7, the excellent superposition of the dashed curves (theoretical third order Chi Square Law values) and the plain curves (measured value) demonstrates this point. Depending on the specific mission and on the architecture of the satellite, the relevant duration and the needed angular knowledge error vary. For instance, significant micro-vibrations in orbit have been measured on laser com satellites [6] and induced micro-vibrations linked to control moment gyroscopes (CMGs) or cryocooler are a concern [7]. As an example, we underline (blue circle on Figure 7) that for a duration of 10 milliseconds, the pointing error will be below 0.3 μrad with a probably of 50%. We believe that with such high angular precision at 500 Hz in a 100 x 100 x 100 mm cube, Astrix NS can be used inside the telescope itself and monitor some of the telescope structural deformations to improve the satellite performances. Finally, the space qualification of Astrix NS is planned for Q1 2023 and the first flight models delivery will be made in S2 2023. REFERENCESECSS-E-ST-60-10C,
“Control performance,”
ESA, Google Scholar
Paveau A, Robustness of Astrix fiber optic gyros in space radiative environment, AAS, 17
–111 Google Scholar
Bonnefois J.J.,
“ASTRIX NS: A SMALL, ACCURATE, VERSATILE AND COSTEFFICIENT FIBER OPTIC GYROSCOPE,”
AAS, 22
–037 Google Scholar
Lefevre H.,
“The fiber optic gyro ‘adventure’ at Photonetics, iXsea and now iXblue,”
in Proc. SPIE,
(2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2560791 Google Scholar
Lefevre H., The fiber optic gyroscope, Google Scholar
Toyoshima M.,
“In-Orbit measurement of spacecraft microvibrations for satellite laser communication link,”
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3482165 Google Scholar
Dennehy C.,
“Spacecraft line-of-sight jitter management and mitigation lessons learned and engineering best practices,”
ESA GNC,
(2021). Google Scholar
|