Theories in distributed decision fusion: comparison and generalization

Stelios C.A. Thomopoulos

doi:10.1117/12.25302

1 April 1991 Theories in distributed decision fusion: comparison and generalization

Stelios C.A. Thomopoulos

Proceedings Volume 1383, Sensor Fusion III: 3D Perception and Recognition; (1991) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.25302
Event: Advances in Intelligent Robotics Systems, 1990, Boston, MA, United States

Abstract

Distributed Decision (Evidence) Fusion (DD(E)F) exhibits some interesting characteristics which are not present in centralized, or raw data, fusion. The interesting characteristics relate to the semantic information that the decisions (in the broader sense of the term) convey which (semantic information) is not present, at least explicitly, when raw data is fused. Different theories and results related to DD(E)F have appeared in the literature. Each theory takes a different stand on the definition of how to measure evidence or combine decisions. The objective of this paper is to investigate the nature of DD(E)F and establish a comparative basis between the two most prominent theories in DD(E)F, namely the Bayesian and Dempster-Shafer theories. To that extent, the similarities and differences between the two theories that result from the semantic differences in the format of the fused information are investigated. A performance comparison between the two theories is attempted. A Generalized Evidence Processing (GEP) theory that extends the Bayesian approach into fuzzy decision making is used to compare the performance of a Bayesian soft decision making system with that of a hard decision making Bayesian system. The similarities and differences between the GEP combining rule and the Dempster's combining rule are discussed and a consistency comparison between the two rules is performed.

Citation Download Citation

Stelios C.A. Thomopoulos "Theories in distributed decision fusion: comparison and generalization", Proc. SPIE 1383, Sensor Fusion III: 3D Perception and Recognition, (1 April 1991); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.25302

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available