Paper
1 November 1991 Error codes applied to optical algebraic processors
Scott Adrian Ellett, John F. Walkup, Thomas F. Krile
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Optical algebraic processors can perform complex calculations in parallel and at high speeds. However, they commonly suffer from a low analog accuracy which hinders their widespread application. Error detection and correction codes provide one technique for improving the accuracy of optical algebraic processors. The use of these codes would allow some of the errors that may occur during a computation to be detected and possibly corrected. This paper describes the results of various computer simulations of optical matrix-vector multipliers employing error-correction codes. It discusses the application of convolutional codes to optical matrix-vector multipliers along with several block codes. Both binary and nonbinary codes are considered. The results indicate that a significant improvement in performance can be obtained when compared with processors not employing error-correction codes. Also, the type of noise, whether signal-independent or signal-dependent noise, has a significant effect on the performance of a matrix-vector multiplier employing an error code. The encoding and decoding operations required for the error codes can be performed optically.
© (1991) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Scott Adrian Ellett, John F. Walkup, and Thomas F. Krile "Error codes applied to optical algebraic processors", Proc. SPIE 1564, Optical Information Processing Systems and Architectures III, (1 November 1991); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.49747
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 1 scholarly publication.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Forward error correction

Binary data

Interference (communication)

Computer programming

Computer simulations

Error control coding

Optical signal processing

Back to Top