Paper
8 May 1995 Sensitivity of radiographic screens to scattered radiation
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
This study compares the relative response of various screen-film and computed radiography (CR) systems to diagnostic radiation exposure. An analytic model was developed to calculate the total energy deposition within the depth of screen and the readout signal generated from this energy for the x-ray detection system. The model was used to predict the relative sensitivity of several screen-film and CR systems to scattered radiation as a function of selected parameters, such as x-ray spectra, phantom thickness, phosphor composition, screen thickness, screen configuration (single front screen, single back screen, screen pair), and readout conditions. Measurements of scatter degradation factor (SDF) for different screen systems were made by using the beam stop technique with water phantoms. Calculated results were found to be consistent with experimental observations, namely, both the BaFBr screen used in a CR system and the CaWO4 screen pair have higher scatter sensitivity than the rare earth Gd2O2S screen pair; the BaFBr screen in the CR front-screen configuration is less sensitive to scatter radiation than in the normal back-screen configuration; and these screens have higher scatter sensitivity as x-ray tube voltage increases.
© (1995) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Kwok Leung Yip, Bruce R. Whiting, Thomas E. Kocher, David P. Trauernicht, and Richard L. Van Metter "Sensitivity of radiographic screens to scattered radiation", Proc. SPIE 2432, Medical Imaging 1995: Physics of Medical Imaging, (8 May 1995); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.208360
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 2 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Photons

X-rays

Chromium

Systems modeling

Absorption

Data modeling

Signal detection

Back to Top