Monitoring and diagnostic techniques for control of overlay in steppers

Gary E. Flores; Warren W. Flack; Susan Avlakeotes; Mark Andrew Merrill

doi:10.1117/12.209193

22 May 1995 Monitoring and diagnostic techniques for control of overlay in steppers

Gary E. Flores, Warren W. Flack, Susan Avlakeotes, Mark Andrew Merrill

Proceedings Volume 2439, Integrated Circuit Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control IX; (1995) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.209193
Event: SPIE's 1995 Symposium on Microlithography, 1995, Santa Clara, CA, United States

Abstract

Semiconductor lithography manufacturing presents a major challenge for the application of classical Statistical Process Control (SPC) methodologies due to the complex nature of this process. For example, difficulties can occur due to inadequate data sampling, nonnormal error distributions, equipment or process instability and nonstationary random errors. Incorrect use of classical SPC techniques can result in the incorrect interpretation of process stability which can have a drastic impact on productivity. Photolithography provides additional SPC challenges due to the inherent multivariable nature of the output variables that are being controlled. This paper examines appropriate SPC and monitoring techniques for stepper control of overlay performance using in-process measurement and analysis equipment to address these issues. The average run length of three charting techniques is compared to quantify the ability of each technique to detect process mean shifts. Shewart, Exponentially Weighted Moving-Average (EWMA) and Cumulative-Sum (CUSUM) charts are analyzed for a baseline process and mean shifts of 0.42, 0.85 and 1.25 standard deviations. These results illustrate the superior performance of a CUSUM chart over Shewart and EWMA charts. In addition, the Shewart chart with Western Electric rules produced false mean shift alarms for the baseline case. The EWMA is also observed to be sensitive to the selection of weighting factors. The effectiveness of plotting individual wafers is compared with plotting lot means. The plotting of individual wafers outperforms lot means in the determination of baseline shifts because of the larger population size of the individual charts.

Citation Download Citation

Gary E. Flores, Warren W. Flack, Susan Avlakeotes, and Mark Andrew Merrill "Monitoring and diagnostic techniques for control of overlay in steppers", Proc. SPIE 2439, Integrated Circuit Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control IX, (22 May 1995); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.209193

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available