Paper
22 May 1995 Methodological issues in the design and evaluation of HMD symbology
Thomas D. Hardiman, Helen J. Dudfield
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
The design and evaluation process for novel displays in military fast jet cockpits is far from optimal. In this paper, the design of symbology is discussed in terms of those involved in the design process and the sources of information available to provide a sound basis for the design of novel Helmet-Mounted Display (HMD) symbology. Further, the evaluation process is discussed in terms of the available methods (subjective and objective), experimental media (flight and simulations), experimental tasks (full mission and part tasks) and the measurement of the key design drivers (workload and situational awareness). Finally, it is argued that the cycle should be more structured and that greater feedback between the operational use of displays and their design is required. These points are summarized in the form of ten guidelines for the design and evaluation of HMD symbology.
© (1995) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Thomas D. Hardiman and Helen J. Dudfield "Methodological issues in the design and evaluation of HMD symbology", Proc. SPIE 2465, Helmet- and Head-Mounted Displays and Symbology Design Requirements II, (22 May 1995); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.209741
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 1 scholarly publication.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Heads up displays

Head-mounted displays

Situational awareness sensors

Computer simulations

Databases

Cockpit displays

Eye

RELATED CONTENT


Back to Top