This paper presents a comparative study about the characteristics of clustering methods for inhomogeneous time-series medical datasets. Using various combinations of comparison methods and grouping methods, we performed clustering experiments of the hepatitis data set and evaluated validity of the results. The results suggested that (1) complete-linkage (CL) criterion in agglomerative hierarchical clustering (AHC) outperformed average-linkage (AL) criterion in
terms of the interpretability of a dendrogram and clustering results, (2) combination of dynamic time warping (DTW) and CL-AHC constantly produced interpretable results, (3) combination of DTW and rough clustering (RC) would be used to find the core sequences of the clusters, (4) multiscale matching may suffer from the treatment of 'no-match' pairs, however, the problem may be eluded by using RC as a subsequent grouping method.
|