Paper
18 April 2006 An approach for performance comparison of image registration methods
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Intensity based image registration is one of the most popularly used methods for automatic image registration. In the recent past, various improvements have been suggested, ranging from variation in the similarity metrics (Correlation Ratio, Mutual Information, etc.) to improvement in the interpolation techniques. The performance of one method over the other is observed either from the final results of registration or visual presence of artifacts in the plots of the objective function (similarity metric) vs. the transformation parameters. None of these are standard representations of the quality of improvement. The final results are not indicative of the effect of the suggested improvement as it depends on various other components of the registration process. Also visual assessment of the presence of artifacts is feasible only when the number of parameters in the transformation involved are less than or equal to two. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach and a metric to quantify the presence of artifacts, which in turn determines the performance of the registration algorithm. This metric is based on the quality of objective-function landscape. Unlike, the already existing methods of comparison, this metric provides a quantitative measure that can be used to rank different algorithms. In this paper, we compare and rank different interpolation techniques based on this metric. Our experimental results show that the relative ordering provided by the metric is consistent with the observation made by traditional approaches like visual interpretation of the similarity metric plot. We also compare and compute the proposed metric for different variants of intensity-based registration methods.
© (2006) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Bhagavath Kumar, Pramod K. Varshney, and Andrew Drozd "An approach for performance comparison of image registration methods", Proc. SPIE 6242, Multisensor, Multisource Information Fusion: Architectures, Algorithms, and Applications 2006, 62420U (18 April 2006); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.666092
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 1 scholarly publication.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Image registration

Visualization

Image processing

Earth observing sensors

Landsat

Image information entropy

Image resolution

Back to Top