A comparison of anamorphic, keystone, and Zernike surface types for aberration correction

John R. Rogers

doi:10.1117/12.871025

2 September 2010 A comparison of anamorphic, keystone, and Zernike surface types for aberration correction

John R. Rogers

Proceedings Volume 7652, International Optical Design Conference 2010; 76520B (2010) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.871025
Event: International Optical Design Conference 2010, 2010, Jackson Hole, WY, United States

Abstract

Adding keystone distortion (in addition to anamorphism) to an off-axis asphere dramatically improves the ability of the surface to correct aberrations. Analogously, using 1-theta and 3-theta terms are important when using Zernike surfaces.

Citation Download Citation

John R. Rogers "A comparison of anamorphic, keystone, and Zernike surface types for aberration correction", Proc. SPIE 7652, International Optical Design Conference 2010, 76520B (2 September 2010); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.871025

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available