High voltage vs. high integration: a comparison between CMOS technologies for SPAD cameras

A. Arbat; A. Comerma; J. Trenado; D. Gascon; A. Vilà; L. Garrido; A. Dieguez

doi:10.1117/12.860482

17 August 2010 High voltage vs. high integration: a comparison between CMOS technologies for SPAD cameras

A. Arbat, A. Comerma, J. Trenado, D. Gascon, A. Vilà, L. Garrido, A. Dieguez

Proceedings Volume 7780, Detectors and Imaging Devices: Infrared, Focal Plane, Single Photon; 77801G (2010) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.860482
Event: SPIE NanoScience + Engineering, 2010, San Diego, California, United States

Abstract

In the last years the fabrication of SPAD cameras has become one of the main fields of interest in 3-D imaging and bioapplications. In this paper we present the comparison between two standard CMOS technologies to fabricate SPADs cameras. The two technologies used in the comparison are a high voltage 0.35μm technology from AMS and a high integration 130nm technology from STM. The advantage of using a standard CMOS technology among a dedicated is the possibility of integrating the control/reading electronics into the same die. Neither of the processes is optimized for optical applications, and no post-processing has been applied to improve the features. The technologies have been selected due to the different integration density, and different intrinsic process parameters with similar cost. Comparison has been done by fabricating several structures in both technologies which allow analyzing sensibility, noise, and time response. Experimental results show that the high voltage technology has a lower level of dark counts than the 130nm. Instead, the high integration technology has a shorter quenching time, 1.5ns, which reduces the afterpulsing events to a negligible level. In optical applications it is important to have a high integration of the camera reducing the pitch of the pixel, while noise effects can be corrected in post-processing. For low frequency events, such as high energetic particle tracking, the noise frequency has to be lower, but it is also required a high fill factor. Depending on the specific application this analysis allows to opt for the most suitable technology.

Citation Download Citation

A. Arbat, A. Comerma, J. Trenado, D. Gascon, A. Vilà, L. Garrido, and A. Dieguez "High voltage vs. high integration: a comparison between CMOS technologies for SPAD cameras", Proc. SPIE 7780, Detectors and Imaging Devices: Infrared, Focal Plane, Single Photon, 77801G (17 August 2010); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.860482

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available