Paper
18 March 2013 Graphene versus oxides for transparent electrode applications
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 8626, Oxide-based Materials and Devices IV; 862603 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2012865
Event: SPIE OPTO, 2013, San Francisco, California, United States
Abstract
Due to their combination of good electrical conductivity and optical transparency, Transparent Conducting Oxides (TCOs) are the most common choice as transparent electrodes for optoelectronics applications. In particular, devices, such as LEDs, LCDs, touch screens and solar cells typically employ indium tin oxide. However, indium has some significant drawbacks, including toxicity issues (which are hampering manufacturing), an increasing rarefication (due to a combination of relative scarcity and increasing demand [1]) and resulting price increases. Moreover, there is no satisfactory option at the moment for use as a p-type transparent contact. Thus alternative materials solutions are actively being sought. This review will compare the performance and perspectives of graphene with respect to TCOs for use in transparent conductor applications.
© (2013) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
V. E. Sandana, D. J. Rogers, F. Hosseini Teherani, P. Bove, and M. Razeghi "Graphene versus oxides for transparent electrode applications", Proc. SPIE 8626, Oxide-based Materials and Devices IV, 862603 (18 March 2013); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2012865
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 4 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Graphene

Electrodes

Transparent conductors

Chemical vapor deposition

Oxides

Resistance

Indium

Back to Top