Open Access
9 April 2020 Recent progress on optical rogue waves in fiber lasers: status, challenges, and perspectives
Yufeng Song, Zhenhong Wang, Cong Wang, Krassimir Panajotov, Han Zhang
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Rogue waves (RWs) are rare, extreme amplitude, localized wave packets, which have received much interest recently in different areas of physics. Fiber lasers with their abundant nonlinear dynamics provide an ideal platform to observe optical RW formation. We review recent research progress on rogue waves in fiber lasers. Basic concepts of RWs and the mechanisms of RW generation in fiber lasers are discussed, along with representative experimental and theoretical results. The measurement methods for RW identification in fiber lasers are presented and analyzed. Finally, prospects for future RW research in fiber lasers are summarized.

1.

Introduction

Rogue waves (RWs), also known as “extreme waves,” “freak waves,” and “abnormal waves,” are the waves that are much greater in amplitude than the close-by waves, unpredictable, and usually appearing unexpectedly from directions other than dominant wind and waves.1,2

The concept of RWs is believed to be first established in the ocean, in reference to the giant waves on the surface of the sea. In oceanography, RWs can be defined as extreme waves with a height more than twice the significant wave height (SWH), which is the mean amplitude of the largest third of waves. According to this definition, RWs are not necessarily the biggest waves found in the ocean, but they are extremely dangerous even to large ships such as ocean liners because of their unexpected and sudden appearance.

The RW concept is also extended to other fields of science, such as matter physics, superfluidity, optics, and even economics.3 There have been various RWs studied, including oceanic RWs,1,2,4 optical RWs,5 acoustic RWs,6,7 capillary RWs,8 electromagnetic RWs,9,10 and even financial RWs.11,12 Several defining properties of RWs can be summarized in three points. First, a large amplitude is required, typically more than twice that of the average amplitude of the highest third of the waves (called SWH). Second, unpredictability of the pulse should be fulfilled. Third, RWs should be rare, i.e., probability distribution function of the wave amplitude should have an L-shape (or other specific long-tail shape).13

Currently, it is well known that RWs are generated in the nonlinear systems.14,15 However, the mechanism driving the emergence of RW is different, depending on the properties of the system.14 In the field of optics, the description of RW generation is typically described by the nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLSE),15,16 which also governs the pulse propagation and soliton formation in the media.1726 Indeed, RW dynamics are closely related to the nonlinear breather and soliton formation induced by modulation instability.27 Within the framework of the one-dimensional NLSE, Peregrine solitons described by a class of nonlinear Akhmediev breather28 are considered as a prototype of RW.2731

Experimentally, in nonlinear optical systems, RWs, also called optical RWs, were first investigated through the supercontinuum (SC) generation process based on the optical fibers.5 From then on, there have been many studies directed to generating RWs in a variety of optical systems. Optical fiber oscillating systems are well known for providing convenient platforms to investigate versatile fundamental nonlinear phenomena, such as modulation instability,3234 soliton formation and dynamics,21,35 and self-similarity.36 Study of optical RW in fiber lasers has attracted plenty of attention since its first demonstration in 2011.13,37 The investigation of the mechanisms of optical RWs in fiber lasers has enabled researchers to deeply understand the generation principle of optical RWs, which can offer a chance to control the operation of optical RWs. There have been several review articles covering the previous study of RWs.38,39 However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no specific review on the dynamics of RWs in fiber lasers.

In this review, the latest research progress on optical RWs in fiber lasers is highlighted. The scope of the paper is mostly focused on experimental investigation of RWs in fiber lasers. In Sec. 2, a brief introduction to the basic concept of optical RWs is given, along with a comparison between optical RWs and ocean RWs. In Sec. 3, we discuss the experimental methods of generating optical RWs in nonfiber lasers. In Sec. 4, we introduce experimental observation of RWs in fiber lasers. In Sec. 5, various measurement methods of optical RWs are discussed. The challenges and outlook on optical RWs in fiber lasers will be discussed in Sec. 6.

2.

Basic Concept of Optical Rogue Waves

An optical RW corresponds to extreme optical pulses that appear suddenly and rarely. A remarkable characteristic of optical RWs is their exceptionally large amplitudes; the largest ones have an intensity at least 30 to 40 times the average intensity.5 RWs are closely related to modulation instability and soliton formation, which are all developed in a nonlinear optical system. The role of modulation instability on the RWs is demonstrated in Ref. 14, where it is shown that modulation instability is crucial for RW generation in many optical systems.

A number of theoretical studies have been advanced for optical RW generation. In 2013, Akhmediev et al.38 previewed the development of optical RWs. In 2016, a roadmap on the optical RWs was summarized by Akhmediev et al.;40 thanks to their review, research of RWs is developing fast.

2.1.

Comparison Between Ocean RWs and Optical RWs in Fiber Lasers

Apart from the optical RWs, the ocean RWs are also greatly important. There are various physical processes in ocean systems, such as wave breaking, dissipation, currents, and wind force.41 The wave breaking is a natural nonlinear process while the dissipation, currents, and wind force are either nonlinear or linear. In a word, the observations of ocean RWs are very complicated. Actually, there are similarities and differences between ocean RWs and optical RWs. In both cases, there is a similar mathematical equation in the form of an NLSE, which can be used for describing the evolutionary process of the envelope in time and space.41,42 In fiber laser, there is the sinusoidal underlying carrier wave at frequency ω while there is the Stokes wave modulated by the NLSE envelope, which (to the second order) includes contributions at both ω and the second harmonic 2ω.43 In both cases, the measurement methods in the domain are also different. In the fiber laser experiments, only the time-domain envelope intensity is generally measured, and there is no information about carrier oscillations recorded. However, there are many individual carrier wave amplitudes directly recorded in oceanic systems, which are more complicated. In addition, the statistics in both systems are usually taken into account. However, there are important differences. In fiber laser experiments, the statistics are determined by the peaks of intensity envelopes. However, in water waves, the statistics are generally dominated by the amplitudes (or trough-to-crest heights or crest heights) of individual waves. In addition, in the fiber laser, the criterion of the RW generation is that its amplitude (the envelope peak intensity) is more than twice that of SWH. In the ocean system, there is the same criterion, but it is expressed in terms of the trough-to-crest height. Although there is an analogy between the generation of ocean RWs and the propagation of pulses in fiber lasers, due to the complexity of ocean RWs, more precisely targeted research in their natural environment is urgently required.

3.

Experimental Observation of Optical Rogue Waves in Nonfiber Lasers

Optical RWs have been experimentally verified in plenty of physical systems. Solli et al.5 demonstrated the first observation of optical RWs, which was based on a platform of SC generation in a photonic crystal fiber. Since then, a variety of nonlinear optical systems have been used for generating RWs. Apart from the SC process,4451 there are other nonlinear optical schemes, such as mode-locked pulse fiber laser5255 and Raman amplifier systems,56,57 which also provided the excellent platforms for investigating the generation of RWs. However, most of these research works in versatile nonlinear optical systems are concerned with the observation of optical RWs, and there is also a strong motive to deeply investigate physical mechanisms of optical RW formation. In this section, RW generation in different platforms apart from fiber lasers is summarized.

In the case of SC generation, an ultrashort pulse generated from a laser was typically inserted into a segment of highly nonlinear optical fiber. The RWs were captured by a real-time measurement system based on time stretching, which will be further discussed in Sec. 5. A typical diagram of experimental setup is shown in Fig. 1. RWs can appear as rare solitons. It has been shown that the optical rogue structures could be efficiently isolated by an adequate spectral filtering based on an off-centered optical band pass filter.5,45,58 In addition, rogue-wave-like extreme value fluctuation in Raman fiber amplifier systems was first reported by Hammani et al.57 A typical diagram of experimental setup of Raman RW generation is shown in Fig. 2. In 2012, they experimentally reported the observations of extreme optical fluctuations in lumped Raman fiber amplifiers.59 In addition, RW statistics during high power femtosecond pulse filamentation in air were reported in 2008.60 In these reports, the RWs are typically in a conservative system without gain and loss in the system, which is distinct from a fiber laser system. In nonconservative systems, deterministic RWs were found in an optically injected semiconductor laser61 and semiconductor laser with saturable absorber for the two-dimensional (2-D) case.62

Fig. 1

The optical set-up for RW generation in a super-continuum system. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 5.

AP_2_2_024001_f001.png

Fig. 2

The optical set-up for RW generation in a fiber Raman amplification system. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 57.

AP_2_2_024001_f002.png

4.

Optical Rogue Waves in Fiber Lasers

Fiber laser, as a dissipative nonlinear optical system, has been intensively employed for the study of optical solitons.21,6365 Soliton dynamics including soliton interactions,6668 soliton molecules,6971 soliton rains,7275 noise-like pulses (NLPs),76,77 and soliton explosions,78 which could be highly related to the RW generation, has been intensively studied in ultrafast fiber lasers. Therefore, fiber lasers also provide an appropriate platform for the generation of dissipative RWs.79 In a fiber laser, dynamic of RWs can be measured within each round trip.40 RWs in fiber lasers were experimentally studied as early as 201113 and numerically studied in 2012.80 Since then, the study of dissipative RWs in fiber lasers has been rapidly developing.5355,79,8197 RWs in fiber lasers can be categorized by pulse duration as three types,94 namely slow RWs, fast RWs, and ultrafast RWs. These RWs are generated by different mechanisms. Ultrafast RWs are difficult to measure using the traditional method, which will be discussed in Sec. 4. According to the formation mechanism, there are mainly three kinds of dissipative RWs generated in the fiber lasers.98 The first type of RWs can be achieved via the chaotic structures among the NLPs. The second one is dark three-sister RWs,99 and the third one is the pulse waves generated from the multiple-pulse interaction,100,101 which have been identified as the aperiodically generated temporal structures.

4.1.

Slow Rogue Waves

Slow RWs are typically with pulse duration from seconds to microseconds and are typically generated in fiber lasers by pump modulation13 or altering the laser gain.80 An experimental study in 2016 showed that, by altering the birefringence of the laser cavity, vector RWs can be observed at the pump power slightly above laser threshold.87 The as-observed optical RWs are generated based on the interaction between the polarization modes with duration from 98 to 255  μs, which can be classified as a type of slow RW. Sergeyev et al. claimed that the increased in-cavity birefringence strength could cause the spatial modulation of the polarization state of the in-cavity lasing field. Based on their numerical predication, a precise polarization control of the pump and the intracavity laser field emitted RWs in an erbium-doped fiber laser (EDFL) has been demonstrated.102 The typical experimental setup of EDFL is shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

A typical schematic diagram of a soliton fiber ring laser operating at 1550 nm based on passive mode locking technique. EDF, erbium-doped fiber; WDM, wavelength division multiplexer; SA, saturable absorber; PC, polarization controller; PI-ISO, polarization-independent isolator; OC, optical coupler; OSA, optical spectrometer.

AP_2_2_024001_f003.png

4.2.

Rogue Waves Generated by Soliton Interaction

Fast RWs typically have durations of hundreds of nanoseconds to tens of picoseconds. Fast RWs are typically generated by soliton interaction in mode-locked fiber lasers (MLFLs). Dissipative RWs generated by chaotic pulse bunching are reported in the literature,81 and Peng et al.89 reported RW generation based on the soliton collision. Peng and Zeng103 demonstrated the generation of RWs among the soliton molecules by the soliton interactions, which could be related to the cavity dissipative effects and high pulse energy. RWs can appear via soliton collisions, producing events with high redshifted energy.104,105 The energy exchange between the solitons is promoted by Raman effects and third-order dispersion.106,107

When the dissipative nonlinear optical systems deviate from equilibrium state, the fiber lasers can produce short and low coherence pulse packets. Such peculiar pulse regime has been first reported in details from the MLFL experiment in 1997,108 which is then called NLPs. NLPs have been found in the fiber lasers based on the multiple mode-locking mechanisms96,109114 and, therefore, are characterized with universality. In other words, NLP generation is quite generic dynamics for partially mode-locked lasers that emit pulse packets of optical noise burst with the fundamental frequency or the harmonics. There are, however, some factors, including the long cavity and the high pumping power, that are quite conducive to generating the NLPs. In the early days, due to the lack of real-time detecting techniques adapted to the time scales of the NLP structures with picosecond or subpicosecond time scales, it is difficult to resolve the internal structure of the NLPs, which increases the sense of mystery about their detailed characteristics and physical forming process to some extent. The measurements based on the commercial optical spectrum analyzer in the NLP regime, generally show the characteristics of stable, smooth, and wideband spectra,76,110,115118 which may be broader than the bandwidth of the gain medium. In addition, the NLPs possess a special autocorrelation trace, with a double-scaled structure with an ultrashort coherent spike located in a wide pedestal, which cannot represent the pulse width of the NLPs. In fact, the narrow peak reflects the typical temporal timescales of the internal noisy pulse packets; the broad baseline suggests that the pulse regime consists of packets with picosecond or subpicosecond range, possessing the fine inner temporal structure with randomly diverse noisy pulse.119 At this stage, due to the low-level information collection through the traditional measuring scheme, including the averaged spectral measurement and the autocorrelation recording, it has been difficult to figure out the formation of the NLPs. In fact, the majority of chaotic pulses, including NLPs, found in the fiber lasers have not yet been resolved in real time. The temporal duration of these pulses is usually in the range of picosecond or subpicosecond, which is smaller than or equal to the temporal resolution of the photoelectric detection system. In addition to the improvement of the electronic detection bandwidth, there is another way to realize the fast detection in real time, i.e., to record shot-to-shot spectra based on the high-speed real-time oscilloscope. In order to achieve such shot-to-shot spectral measurements, a new detection technique can be applied, which is known as the dispersive Fourier-transform (DFT) technique.120 In the fiber lasers, the DFT technique is generally implemented by sending the ultrafast output pulses through a long fiber with either positive or negative dispersion, producing the sufficient accumulated dispersion so that the spectral fluctuations of these pulses are mapped into a temporal intensity waveform, which can be captured by the real-time oscilloscope with high electronic bandwidth. In this way, shot-to-shot spectra of the internal pulse dynamics can be analyzed. DFT has been used for observing the generation of RWs in the NLP regime.82,121124 However, it is important to note that not all the NLPs could be considered as RWs. When the pulse-energy distribution of the NLPs is always Gaussian profile, this pulse state may be not the RW regime.124 In the literature,123 even though the pulse-energy distribution of the NLPs in the normal dispersion is nearly Gaussian, the distribution of the peak optical spectral intensity for these pulses displays the obvious non-Gaussian statistics, which implies that this NLP regime could be related to RWs. In the former, the observation of the little deviation from Gaussian statistics is mainly caused by the insufficient temporal resolution of the detection scheme; the DFT technique is implemented in the latter, which can significantly improve the temporal resolution.

4.3.

Recent Works

Apart from the above-mentioned methods, there are also several observations of RWs in fiber lasers reported in the last 3 years. Stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) has been recently considered as a trigger effect for the generation of RWs. Experimentally, Brillouin scattering-induced RWs in self-pulsing fiber lasers,91 Q-switched random laser,125 and high power amplifier126 were reported. Boukhaoui et al. numerically studied the influence of SBS on the occurrence of RWs in self-pulsing fiber lasers.127 They showed that the RW generation in the SBS process is highly related to high-order Stokes generation while acoustic noise effect is negligible for the occurrence of extreme events. Recently, dissipative RWs generated in a linear cavity normal dispersion ytterbium-doped fiber laser have been reported.55 The as-mentioned laser is mode locked by SESAM, and a chirped fiber Bragg grating was introduced into the cavity for dispersion compensating. It is claimed that the generation of RWs may be attributed to the filtering effect of the chirped fiber Bragg grating, which induces multipulsing instability to the cavity. In 2018, researchers demonstrated observation of optical RWs in the fiber laser with the generation of random dissipative soliton.95 It was shown that, with proper adjustment of the cavity parameters, i.e., intracavity polarization state and pump power level, the random dissipative soliton buildup can be obtained in multiple-pulse regime. Along with the process of dissipative soliton buildup, high-amplitude waves were analyzed by studying the real-time spectral dynamics and the temporal pulse trains, which was considered as further confirmation of optical RWs using the method of statistics. The achieved results offer a promising choice for the investigation of the optical RW phenomenon in the pulsed fiber lasers and are valuable for further revealing the physical mechanism for optical RW generation.

Cai et al.121 reported on the generation of RWs among the NLPs in the mode-locked EDFL with microfiber-based graphene saturable absorber (see Fig. 4). The pulse regime shows the smooth and broad optical spectrum and the temporal trains with a fundamental frequency of 7.35 MHz. This pulsating state has an autocorrelation trace with a narrow coherent peak rooted from the wide shoulder. The statistical distribution for the pulse-amplitude fluctuations of the NLP packet is shown in Fig. 5(a). As shown, this distribution curve exhibits an obvious structure of elevated tails, which is non-Gaussian. In addition, the intensity of the maximal amplitude is more than twice the intensity of SWH that is one of the key criteria for generating RWs. Finally, by utilizing the DFT technique, they provided the evolution of the sectional NLP packet in several roundtrips, as shown in Fig. 5(b). From this figure, one can see that there is a clear chaotic wave with large amplitude appearing in the NLP packet, which is similar to the stroboscopic recording of the RW event in the literature128 and to reported numerical simulations of dissipative RWs.37 These experimental results suggest that there are typical RWs appearing in the NLP regime. In addition, Wang et al. demonstrated in 2018 by numerical simulations dissipative RWs among the NLPs, providing in such a way a possibility to investigate their evolution,96 as shown in Fig. 6. From this figure, it can be seen that, for a saturation energy of Esat=0.06 and 0.12 nJ, the evolution of the pulse did not clearly lead to an NLP regime but to stable single-pulse and two-pulse operations, respectively. When the value of Esat is set to 0.4 nJ, more pulses are obtained. By further increasing the saturation energy to 8 nJ, RWs appear among the NLP regime. In other words, with the increment of Esat, the pulse number in the laser cavity also increases, which can lead to the formation of the many pulse bunches. And the pulse-to-pulse interaction in these bunches enables the formation of the RWs.37,79,128 Figure 7 shows the theoretical statistical properties of the pulses for different Esat values. Obviously, the highest amplitude for each Esat value is more than twice the SWH, which confirms the generation of optical RWs.

Fig. 4

The output characteristics of the NLPs: (a) the optical spectrum, (b) the pulse trains, and (c) the autocorrelation trace. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 90.

AP_2_2_024001_f004.png

Fig. 5

(a) The pulse–amplitude statistical distribution histogram for the NLP regimes and (b) the temporal evolution of the localized NLPs. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 90.

AP_2_2_024001_f005.png

Fig. 6

The numerical evolutions of the pulses for different Esat values of (a) 0.06 nJ, (b) 0.12 nJ, (c) 0.4 nJ, and (d) 8 nJ. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 96.

AP_2_2_024001_f006.png

Fig. 7

The numerical statistical distribution of RWs for different Esat values of (a) 0.6 nJ, (b) 0.8 nJ, (c) 8 nJ, and (d) 14 nJ. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 96.

AP_2_2_024001_f007.png

5.

Optical Rogue Wave Measurement

For the measurement of slow optical RWs, it is convenient to use a high-speed oscilloscope combined with a wide bandwidth photodetector.53,79,128 Ultrafast RWs cannot be directly measured by real-time oscilloscope. Indeed, there are two challenges for the real-time measurement of ultrafast RWs: the limitation of the data converter and the trade-off between the sensitivity and the speed of the optoelectronic front-end. Currently, there have been mainly two measurement methods developed for ultrafast RWs: time stretching and time lensing.

5.1.

Time Stretching

Time stretching is a real-time measurement technique based on DFT,120 which enables fast real-time measurements in optical imaging and spectroscopy. The DFT technique can map the optical spectrum to temporal pulse waveform by a dispersive medium: the intensity envelope in the time domain is equivalent to the optical spectrum as, e.g., measured by optical spectrum analyzer. For this to happen, one should satisfy a certain condition: the pulses are properly stretched by the dispersive element so that the corresponding temporal waveform is equivalent to the analogy of the far-field diffraction condition in the spatial domain. A typical schematic diagram of time-stretching technique is shown in Fig. 8. The waveform of the input pulses can be stretched in time by the dispersive element with large group-velocity dispersion. Then, the output pulse trains are captured by the high-speed photodetector and oscilloscope, realizing the real-time measurement. Herein, the chirped fiber Bragg grating, a normal dispersion fiber or an anomalous dispersion fiber can be used as dispersive element. In general, the normal dispersion fiber is used in the vast majority of the reports with the DFT technique, because the anomalous dispersion fiber may have a lower threshold for nonlinearity and necessitate lower power levels (reducing the signal-to-noise ratio at the measurement oscilloscope). By using the time-stretching method, Fourier transform of optical pulses can be monitored in real time. In other words, one can measure the optical spectrum of optical pulses in real time. Time-stretching methods have been widely employed in the experimental investigation of optical pulses in the fiber lasers by researchers, including the dissipative solitons,52,129,130 soliton molecules,131133 chaotic pulses,134,135 intermittent pulses,78,136 transition dynamics, and other nonlinear dynamics.137139 In 2014, the Raman RW generation in the pulse fiber lasers was provided by the research group of Runge et al.82 By employing the pulse stretching method, the statistical histograms of wave events in more detail were investigated and the spectral evolution of RWs in real time was analyzed. Also in 2014, Lecaplain et al.123 demonstrated RW emission in a fiber laser operating in the NLP regime. In the experiment, they used time-stretching measurement method to make the statistical distribution histogram of pulse spectral intensity, which could display the strong deviation from the Gaussian shape and the typical long-tail structure. In addition, the maximal amplitude was more than twice the SWH. Clearly, these characteristics indicated the generation of RWs. In 2015, researchers reported RWs in the Yb-doped fiber laser with normal dispersion.124 The consecutive single-shot spectra of RWs were presented by the time-stretching measurement. Chowdhury et al.55 presented experimental investigation of RWs in the linear cavity Yb-doped fiber laser. They employed the dispersive Fourier transform method to observe the existence of RWs and to analyze the corresponding spectral evolution. In short, using the time-stretching method, RW generation can be effectively verified. However, the phase information of the RWs is usually missing.140,141 Therefore, more measuring methods should be considered to further investigate the comprehensive characteristics of RWs.

Fig. 8

The optical set-up for the time-stretching measurement method. PD, photodetector.

AP_2_2_024001_f008.png

5.2.

Time Lensing

Time lensing comes from a temporal imaging system, which is analogous to spatial imaging system. A time lens is capable of compressing or expanding the pulse width of optical waveforms without distortion.142,143 Time-lensing measurements can support real-time measurement of ultrashort pulses with a subpicosecond resolution.143,144 The time-lensing method has been applied to the research of incoherent soliton propagation in optical turbulence145 and stochastic breather emergence in modulation instability.146 Using the time-lensing method, ultrafast RWs in a vector field have been demonstrated.147 In the time-lensing measurement of RWs, the imaged signal must be synchronized for a specific timing.145 The typical experimental observation system of time-lensing measurement is shown in Fig. 9. The statistical distribution with heavy-tailed structure confirmed the generation of RWs. In 2016, the researchers reported the generation of RWs events in the fiber lasers using the real-time measurement based on the time-lensing methods.146 Li et al.148 demonstrated the observation of optical RWs in MLFL operating in the NLP state by utilizing the time-lensing technique. In addition, they investigated the round-trip tracking evolution and the detailed temporal patterns of RWs in the time domain at sub-ps resolution. However, compared with the time-stretching measurement, the measuring system of the time-lensing method is more complex, which can increase the experimental cost to some extents.

Fig. 9

Time lens for observing RWs: (a) the experimental setup and (b) the spatial analogy. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 145.

AP_2_2_024001_f009.png

5.3.

Hybrid Method

Time stretching and time lensing are powerful tools to observe fast RWs in fiber lasers. In Ref. 149, systematic and dedicated experimental research on wave-packet formation and shot-to-shot coherence in quasi-mode-locked operation is carried out. Combining the time-stretching and time-lensing methods, simultaneous measurement of spectral and temporal profiles of the soliton dynamics and RWs can be performed. The combination enabled real-time measurement of both the phase and intensity of RWs and unveiled different temporal patterns.146,150,151 Ryczkowski et al.152 demonstrated the real-time full-field characterization of unstable pulses in a fiber laser through a saturable absorber mirror (SAM) by simultaneously employing the time-stretching and time-lensing techniques. The simultaneous use of two methods is capable of completely characterizing the real-time evolution of RWs in the spectral and temporal domains, which will be a better way for investigating the generation and dynamics of RWs in fiber lasers in the future (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10

Experimental setup of the hybrid measurement method based on time stretching and time lensing. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 152.

AP_2_2_024001_f010.png

5.4.

Other Measurements

Apart from the above methods, the direct measurement of RWs in fiber lasers can be conducted by the oscilloscope in some conditions. For the pulse fiber lasers, the pulse amplitudes can be recorded to draw the statistical distribution histogram by utilizing the oscilloscope with the high electronic bandwidths.79,128 When the pulse repetition frequency is low enough and the time interval between the pulses is sufficiently large, the histogram of pulse amplitude can be created using an oscilloscope with a relatively low electronic bandwidth to continuously record the amplitudes of plenty of pulses and analyze the total pulse intensity. Events with pulse amplitude larger than twice the SWH can prove the generation of RWs. This measuring method based on the oscilloscope can be simpler and more convenient than the time stretching and time lensing in pulse fiber lasers. Liu et al.53 reported the generation of optical RWs in a pulse fiber laser. In their experiment, the repetition frequency was 5.03 MHz and the corresponding pulse interval was 198.8 ns. They utilized 8-GHz oscilloscope to record 105 pulse peak intensity, creating the amplitude histogram with log scale. This histogram exhibited the typical statistical distribution with a long-tail structure. In addition, the largest amplitude of pulses was more than twice the SWH. These features showed that the pulses could be regarded as typical RWs. Wang et al.96 also investigated RW formation in pulse fiber laser. The repetition rate of their fiber laser was 3.47 MHz and the time interval among adjacent pulses was 288.2 ns. The research group spent several hours in recording about 500 thousand temporal samples on the 2-GHz oscilloscope. The corresponding distribution histogram could display an obvious long-tail structure, and the highest amplitude was twice the SWH, which confirmed the generation of RWs. However, it is difficult to investigate the real-time wave events of RWs by the direct measurement of the oscilloscope. Therefore, it is necessary to combine the various measuring methods to conduct the research of RWs.

6.

Outlook

As mentioned above, RWs in fiber lasers are well developed and are still being intensively investigated. In Sec. 4, we discussed the observations of RWs in various fiber lasers, such as the MLFL with different types of saturable absorbers, Q-switched random laser, and the self-pulsing fiber lasers. Compared with other kinds of fiber lasers, the MLFL can offer a more convenient playground for observing the generation of optical RWs because of their many advantages, such as low price, ultrashort pulses, simple structure, and good stability. When the fiber lasers are mode locked by the 2-D materials, these materials can not only provide excellent saturable absorption properties but also enhance the nonlinear effects for the pulse interactions in the fiber lasers, which benefits the formation of RWs. Different from the MLFL, the SBS effects can be formed in the Q-switched random lasers125 and the self-pulsing fiber lasers.127 The influence of SBS can introduce a trigger effect for the RW generation. It can be believed that the observations of RWs in various fiber lasers will attract more attention in the future. As the study of fiber lasers advances, RWs in fiber lasers will be further investigated from the following several aspects.

6.1.

Deterministic Rogue Wave in Fiber Lasers

Based on the various experimental observations of RWs in fiber lasers, it is intriguing to investigate the deterministic prediction of RW generation in fiber lasers. Deterministic optical RW generation typically depends on a theoretical prediction combined with proper experimental conditions. Sergeyev et al. presented slow deterministic vector RWs in an EDFL passively mode locked by carbon nanotube. By controlling the polarization state of intracavity and pump wave, deterministic RWs can be generated.153

It is also interesting to consider that algorithm-controlled fiber lasers could be a next-generation platform for deterministic RW generation. Algorithm-controlled fiber lasers will be further discussed in Sec. 6.4.

6.2.

Rogue Waves in Two-Dimensional Material-Based Mode Locked Fiber Laser

In the last decade, the MLFLs based on 2-D materials have been fast developing.69,154162 It is worth mentioning that an MLFL with a saturable absorber would be a promising direction for the study of RWs. Earlier works on RWs in fiber lasers were mostly mode locked by nonlinear polarization rotation (NPR). Indeed, recently there have been many results on the RWs in fiber lasers with real saturable absorbers, and it has been demonstrated that saturable absorbers play an essential role in the RW generation.147 Liu et al.53 demonstrated dissipative RW generation in pulsed fiber laser with topological insulator saturable absorber on microfiber. The authors ascertained that the topological insulator microfiber device introduces strong nonlinear interactions, which contributed greatly to the generation of RWs. In 2016, their group also reported a dissipative RW induced by soliton explosion in fiber lasers, which are mode-locked by a carbon nanotube.54 In 2017, RWs in mode ultrafast pulse fiber laser mode locked by graphene-decorated microfiber90 were reported. In 2018, RWs were reported in MoS2 MLFL operating at 2000 nm.96 Klein et al.94 found ultrafast RWs in a fiber laser with the graphene saturable absorber, which is attributed to the noninstantaneous relaxation of the saturable absorber together with the polarization mode dispersion of the cavity.

Recently, RW generation has been reported in a linear-cavity Yb-doped fiber laser mode-locked by semiconductor SAM.55 It is noted that the authors mentioned that the SESAM plays an important role on the formation of RWs. However, there have been no systematic studies on the dynamic of RWs in a specific SA-MLFL, which would be a direction for the study in the future. In the last decade, 2-D nanomaterials, including grapheme,73,163165 topological insulators,53 and transition metal dichalcogenides,166168 have been widely applied as optical saturable absorbers for MLFLs and have been studied for RW generation.53 In the last three years, there have been many 2-D materials reported for application in ultrafast fiber lasers,169172 which has significantly enhanced the development of the ultrafast lasers. Continually searching and employing new materials with good saturable absorptions and highly nonlinear characteristics may sufficiently quicken the above-mentioned process. It can be expected that more 2-D materials-based fiber lasers will provide appropriate platforms for the study of RW generation and dynamics in the future.

6.3.

Rogue Waves in Mid-Infrared Fiber Lasers

In recent decades, the study of nonlinear fiber optics has been extended to the mid-infrared band, and mid-infrared fiber lasers have attracted intensive interest. It is natural that study of optical RWs has also been extended to the mid-infrared region. In 2011, the formation of mid-infrared RWs was numerically investigated in the soft glass fibers.173 In 2017, mid-infrared optical RWs generated by SC in chalcogenide fibers were reported by Liu et al.174 RWs were subsequently found in mid-infrared ultrafast fiber laser. Researchers reported optical RWs in a Tm-doped fiber laser96 mode locked by MoS2. They experimentally observed dissipative RWs in the fiber lasers generated from an NLP state. Another finding of optical RWs in mid-infrared was from Akosman and Sander.175 They demonstrated the route from a stable mode locking state toward RW formation in a linear cavity Tm/Ho-doped fiber lasers operating at 1980  nm.175 According to the recent works, it is easy to find that the mechanism and nonlinear dynamics of the RWs at 2  μm are comparable to those observed at 1 and 1.5  μm. It indicates that RW generation is a general feature of fiber lasers. So far several works on MIR RWs have been reported with operating wavelength limited to 2  μm; RWs at 3  μm and above have not been discovered. It can be anticipated that study of RWs at mid-infrared band will be another hot topic in the field of nonlinear fiber optics.

6.4.

Rogue Waves in Algorithm-Controlled Fiber Lasers

A variety of SAs have been extensively applied to the observation of RW generation in the pulse fiber lasers. However, there are some disadvantages in different SAs. For example, the NPR technique, which is one of the artificial SAs, shows a strong polarization-dependent feature, which can hinder corresponding applications in the research of RWs. Recently, a programmable NPR MLFL at 1.5  μm with a human-like algorithm has been presented in the literature.176 Stable fundamental mode-locked regime has been automatically obtained in the pulsed fiber laser. In addition, this fiber laser showed the initial mode-locking time of 0.22 s and recovery time of 14.8 ms. In addition, this fiber laser can lock onto Q-switched regimes and Q-switch mode locking. The intelligent programmable method greatly improves the reliability of MLFL, which may also be used for the observation of RWs in the fiber lasers with SAs. In fact, the NLPs are realized in the machine-learning-based MLFL. Researchers have also demonstrated complex transition pulse regimes from the MLFL based on an intelligent polarization algorithm control. Furthermore, research groups have employed machine learning to analyze the generation of extreme events in optical fiber modulation instability.177 So far, the investigation of RWs in algorithm-controlled fiber lasers has not been yet demonstrated. We believe that the generating mechanism of rouge waves will be effectively studied in pulse fiber lasers with different SAs through human-like intelligent methods.

6.5.

Rogue Waves Based on the Multimode Fiber or Multimode Fiber Lasers

Remarkable research on RWs in single-mode fiber lasers has been widely conducted due to their potential value in the ocean optics. However, the pulse energy of single-mode fiber lasers is approaching limits that may hinder their development and application in scientific research, industrial processing, and other fields. Compared with the single-mode fibers, the multimode fibers (MMFs) can enhance the capacity of communication systems, promoting the potential impact of optical pulses in fiber lasers. The nonlinear propagation in the MMF lasers is closely related to a complex spatiotemporal mixing process caused by the nonlinearity and waveguide imperfections.178 Recently, the spatiotemporal dynamics of optical pulses have been demonstrated in the MMFs, such as the spatiotemporal mode-locking,179 the soliton molecules,180 harmonic mode locking,181 the spatiotemporal instability,182 and beam self-cleaning.183 This research provides new approaches for exploring RW generation in the MMF lasers. In addition, researchers have reported efficient SC generation by employing a 1064-nm laser source to pump a graded index MMF.184 Indeed, RWs are apt to be observed in the SC generation. Therefore, the MMF is suitable for investigating the generation of RWs. It can be expected that further exploration of RWs in the MMFs or MMF lasers will be a new hot topic in nonlinear fiber optics.

6.6.

Rogue Waves Induced by the Optical Vortex Beams in the Fiber Lasers

RWs have been obtained in several optical configurations, such as the photonic crystals,185 the optical fibers,186 and the SC generation.45 Recently, the generation of 2-D optical RWs in the presence of turbulence with the interaction of optical vortices was demonstrated by Gibson et al.,187 which indicates the optical vortices can induce the generation of RWs. At present, vortex beams in the fiber lasers have been demonstrated because of the promising applications in the quantum optics,188 optical micromanipulation,189 rotation detection,190 WDM (mode-division multiplexing) systems,191 and nonlinear fiber optics.192 In the fiber systems, the vortex beams are generally realized by the modulating elements, including the mode selective couplers,193,194 long period fiber gratings,195,196 and microstructured fiber facets.197 The mode-locked vortex beams through the mode fibers in the all-fiber lasers have been reported.198 Therefore, the optical RWs based on the vortex beams in the fiber lasers will be one of the research hot topics, promoting the further development of nonlinear optics.

6.7.

Rogue Waves in Temporal Cavity Soliton Fiber Lasers

Apart from the MLFL, the fiber laser without the mode locker inserted in the cavity can also generate ultrashort pulses, for example, the temporal cavity solitons (TCSs). When the dispersion and nonlinearity are balanced in the fiber lasers, TCSs are formed, which can transmit indefinitely and keep their shape in the fiber cavity.199 At present, TCSs have been intensely reported in fiber laser cavities20,199201 due to their potential applications in the all-optical buffer and coherent frequency combs.202 Researchers have reported the experimental observation of TCS bound states in universal mechanisms.201 TCSs in these bound states can interact with each other, which may induce the optical RW generation. At the moment, there is no experimental observation of optical RWs through TCS fiber lasers. We believe that the generation of optical RWs in TCS fiber lasers will be realized in future, a potential hot topic that would further reveal more physical phenomena in nonlinear fiber optics fields.

7.

Conclusion

RWs are extreme events first observed in the ocean, showing great threat to the safety of sea-going personnel and ships. The study of RWs in different systems has remained a hot research topic. Fiber lasers provide an ideal platform to observe the generation of optical RWs as well to as investigate their behaviour. We hope that this review will be helpful for future studies of RWs in different optical systems.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61705140), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2018M643165), and the Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Vlaanderen FWO (G0E5819N).

References

1. 

F. Fedele, “Rogue waves in oceanic turbulence,” Phys. D-Nonlinear Phenom., 237 (14–17), 2127 –2131 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2008.01.022 Google Scholar

2. 

K. Dysthe, H. E. Krogstad and P. Muller, “Oceanic rogue waves,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 40 287 –310 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102203 Google Scholar

3. 

V. Ruban et al., “Rogue waves: towards a unifying concept? Discussions and debates,” Eur. Phys. J.-Spec. Top., 185 (1), 5 –15 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2010-01234-y CECED9 Google Scholar

4. 

A. L. Islas and C. M. Schober, “Predicting rogue waves in random oceanic sea states,” Phys. Fluids, 17 (3), 031701 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1872093 Google Scholar

5. 

D. R. Solli et al., “Optical rogue waves,” Nature, 450 (7172), 1054 –1057 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06402 Google Scholar

6. 

W. M. Moslem et al., “Dust-acoustic rogue waves in a nonextensive plasma,” Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys., 84 (6), 066402 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.84.066402 Google Scholar

7. 

Y. Y. Tsai, J. Y. Tsai and I. Lin, “Generation of acoustic rogue waves in dusty plasmas through three-dimensional particle focusing by distorted waveforms,” Nat. Phys., 12 (6), 573 –577 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3669 Google Scholar

8. 

M. Shats, H. Punzmann and H. Xia, “Capillary rogue waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 104 (10), 104503 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.104503 Google Scholar

9. 

J. Borhanian, “Extraordinary electromagnetic localized structures in plasmas: modulational instability, envelope solitons, and rogue waves,” Phys. Lett. A, 379 (6), 595 –602 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2014.12.018 Google Scholar

10. 

G. P. Veldes et al., “Electromagnetic rogue waves in beam–plasma interactions,” J. Opt., 15 (6), 064003 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8978/15/6/064003 Google Scholar

11. 

Z. Y. Yan, “Vector financial rogue waves,” Phys. Lett. A, 375 (48), 4274 –4279 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2011.09.026 Google Scholar

12. 

Z. Y. Yan, “Financial rogue waves,” Commun. Theor. Phys., 54 (5), 947 –949 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/54/5/31 Google Scholar

13. 

A. N. Pisarchik et al., “Rogue waves in a multistable system,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 107 (27), 274101 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.274101 Google Scholar

14. 

J. M. Dudley et al., “Instabilities, breathers and rogue waves in optics,” Nat. Photonics, 8 (10), 755 –764 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2014.220 Google Scholar

15. 

N. Akhmediev, J. M. Soto-Crespo and A. Ankiewicz, “Extreme waves that appear from nowhere: on the nature of rogue waves,” Phys. Lett. A, 373 (25), 2137 –2145 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2009.04.023 Google Scholar

16. 

M. Onorato et al., “Rogue waves: from nonlinear Schrodinger breather solutions to sea-keeping test,” PLoS One, 8 (2), e54629 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054629 Google Scholar

17. 

D. Y. Tang et al., “Dark soliton fiber lasers,” Opt. Express, 22 (16), 19831 –19837 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.019831 Google Scholar

18. 

B. A. Malomed, “Bound solitons in the nonlinear Schrodinger–Ginzburg-Landau equation,” Phys. Rev. A, 44 (10), 6954 –6957 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.44.6954 Google Scholar

19. 

B. A. Malomed and L. Stenflo, “Modulational instabilities and soliton solutions of a generalized nonlinear Schrodinger equation,” J. Phys. A-Math. Gen., 24 (19), L1149 –L1153 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/24/19/006 Google Scholar

20. 

D. Y. Tang et al., “Temporal cavity soliton formation in an anomalous dispersion cavity fiber laser,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B-Opt. Phys., 31 (12), 3050 –3056 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.31.003050 Google Scholar

21. 

Y. F. Song et al., “Recent progress of study on optical solitons in fiber lasers,” Appl. Phys. Rev., 6 (2), 021313 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5091811 Google Scholar

22. 

J. Ma et al., “Observation of dark-bright vector solitons in fiber lasers,” Opt. Lett., 44 (9), 2185 –2188 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.44.002185 Google Scholar

23. 

X. Hu et al., “Observation of incoherently coupled dark-bright vector solitons in single-mode fibers,” Opt. Express, 27 (13), 18311 –18317 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.018311 Google Scholar

24. 

J. Guo et al., “Observation of vector solitons supported by third-order dispersion,” Phys. Rev. A, 99 (6), 061802(R) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.061802 Google Scholar

25. 

G. D. Shao et al., “Soliton-dark pulse pair formation in birefringent cavity fiber lasers through cross phase coupling,” Opt. Express, 23 (20), 26252 –26258 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.026252 Google Scholar

26. 

Y. F. Song et al., “280 GHz dark soliton fiber laser,” Opt. Lett., 39 (12), 3484 –3487 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.003484 Google Scholar

27. 

V. I. Shrira and V. V. Geogjaev, “What makes the Peregrine soliton so special as a prototype of freak waves?,” J. Eng. Math., 67 (1–2), 11 –22 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-009-9347-2 Google Scholar

28. 

K. Hammani et al., “Peregrine soliton generation and breakup in standard telecommunications fiber,” Opt. Lett., 36 (2), 112 –114 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.36.000112 Google Scholar

29. 

B. Kibler et al., “The Peregrine soliton in nonlinear fibre optics,” Nat. Phys., 6 (10), 790 –795 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1740 Google Scholar

30. 

H. Bailung, S. K. Sharma and Y. Nakamura, “Observation of peregrine solitons in a multicomponent plasma with negative ions,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 107 (25), 255005 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.255005 Google Scholar

31. 

B. Kibler et al., “Peregrine soliton in optical fiber-based systems,” in Conf. Lasers and Electro-Opt. (CLEO), (2011). Google Scholar

32. 

M. Haelterman, “Modulational instability, periodic-waves and black-and-white vector solitons in birefringent Kerr media,” Opt. Commun., 111 (1–2), 86 –92 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4018(94)90144-9 Google Scholar

33. 

K. Tai, A. Hasegawa and A. Tomita, “Observation of modulational instability in optical fibers,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 56 (2), 135 –138 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.135 Google Scholar

34. 

D. Y. Tang et al., “GHz pulse train generation in fiber lasers by cavity induced modulation instability,” Opt. Fiber Technol., 20 (6), 610 –614 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yofte.2014.08.002 Google Scholar

35. 

L. F. Mollenauer, R. H. Stolen and J. P. Gordon, “Experimental-observation of picosecond pulse narrowing and solitons in optical fibers,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 45 (13), 1095 –1098 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.1095 Google Scholar

36. 

J. M. Dudley et al., “Self-similarity in ultrafast nonlinear optics,” Nat. Phys., 3 (9), 597 –603 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys705 Google Scholar

37. 

J. Soto-Crespo, P. Grelu and N. Akhmediev, “Dissipative rogue waves: extreme pulses generated by passively mode-locked lasers,” Phys. Rev. E, 84 (1), 016604 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.84.016604 Google Scholar

38. 

N. Akhmediev et al., “Recent progress in investigating optical rogue waves,” J. Opt., 15 (6), 060201 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8978/15/6/060201 Google Scholar

39. 

S. H. Chen et al., “Versatile rogue waves in scalar, vector, and multidimensional nonlinear systems,” J. Phys. A-Math. Theor., 50 (46), 463001 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aa8f00 Google Scholar

40. 

N. Akhmediev et al., “Roadmap on optical rogue waves and extreme events,” J. Opt., 18 (6), 063001 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8978/18/6/063001 Google Scholar

41. 

J. M. Dudley et al., “Rogue waves and analogies in optics and oceanography,” Nat. Rev. Phys., 1 (11), 675 –689 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-019-0100-0 Google Scholar

42. 

C. C. Mei et al., Theory and Applications of Ocean Surface Waves, 23 Expanded ed.World Scientific, Hackensack, New Jersey (2005). Google Scholar

43. 

A. Chabchoub et al., “The nonlinear Schrodinger equation and the propagation of weakly nonlinear waves in optical fibers and on the water surface,” Ann. Phys., 361 490 –500 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2015.07.003 Google Scholar

44. 

J. M. Dudley, G. Genty and B. Eggleton, “Optical rogue wave dynamics in supercontinuum generation,” in Joint Conf. Opto-Electron. and Commun. Conf. and the Aust. Conf. Opt. Fibre Technol., (2008). Google Scholar

45. 

J. M. Dudley, G. Genty and B. J. Eggleton, “Harnessing and control of optical rogue waves in supercontinuum generation,” Opt. Express, 16 (6), 3644 –3651 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.003644 Google Scholar

46. 

G. Genty, B. Eggleton and J. M. Dudley, “Dynamics and control of optical rogue waves in supercontinuum generation,” in 34th Eur. Conf. Opt. Commun., (2008). Google Scholar

47. 

D. R. Solli, C. Ropers and B. Jalali, “Optical rogue waves and stimulated supercontinuum generation,” Proc. SPIE, 7728 772810 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.854662 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

48. 

Q. Li et al., “Control of optical rogue waves in supercontinuum generation with a minute continuous wave,” 2011). Google Scholar

49. 

S. T. Sorensen et al., “Influence of pump power and modulation instability gain spectrum on seeded supercontinuum and rogue wave generation,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B-Opt. Phys., 29 (10), 2875 –2885 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.29.002875 Google Scholar

50. 

M. Erkintalo, G. Genty and J. M. Dudley, “Rogue-wave-like characteristics in femtosecond supercontinuum generation,” Opt. Lett., 34 (16), 2468 –2470 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.34.002468 Google Scholar

51. 

D. R. Solli, C. Ropers and B. Jalali, “Active control of rogue waves for stimulated supercontinuum generation,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 101 (23), 233902 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.233902 Google Scholar

52. 

K. Krupa, K. Nithyanandan and P. Grelu, “Vector dynamics of incoherent dissipative optical solitons,” Optica, 4 (10), 1239 –1244 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.4.001239 Google Scholar

53. 

M. Liu et al., “Dissipative rogue waves induced by long-range chaotic multi-pulse interactions in a fiber laser with a topological insulator-deposited microfiber photonic device,” Opt. Lett., 40 (20), 4767 –4770 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.40.004767 Google Scholar

54. 

M. Liu et al., “Dissipative rogue waves induced by soliton explosions in an ultrafast fiber laser,” Opt. Lett., 41 (17), 3912 –3915 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.41.003912 Google Scholar

55. 

S. Das Chowdhury et al., “Rogue waves in a linear cavity Yb-fiber laser through spectral filtering induced pulse instability,” Opt. Lett., 44 (9), 2161 –2164 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.44.002161 Google Scholar

56. 

Y. E. Monfared and S. A. Ponomarenko, “Non-Gaussian statistics and optical rogue waves in stimulated Raman scattering,” Opt. Express, 25 (6), 5941 –5950 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.005941 Google Scholar

57. 

K. Hammani et al., “Optical rogue-wave-like extreme value fluctuations in fiber Raman amplifiers,” Opt. Express, 16 (21), 16467 –16474 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.016467 Google Scholar

58. 

C. Lafargue et al., “Direct detection of optical rogue wave energy statistics in supercontinuum generation,” Electron. Lett., 45 (4), 217 –218 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1049/el:20093582 ELTNBK 0013-4759 Google Scholar

59. 

K. Hammani and C. Finot, “Experimental signatures of extreme optical fluctuations in lumped Raman fiber amplifiers,” Opt. Fiber Technol., 18 (2), 93 –100 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yofte.2012.01.003 Google Scholar

60. 

J. Kasparian et al., “Optical rogue wave statistics in laser filamentation,” Opt. Express, 17 (14), 12070 –12075 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.012070 Google Scholar

61. 

C. Bonatto et al., “Deterministic optical rogue waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 107 (5), 053901 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.053901 Google Scholar

62. 

F. Selmi et al., “Spatiotemporal chaos induces extreme events in an extended microcavity laser,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 116 (1), 013901 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.013901 Google Scholar

63. 

G. D. Shao et al., “Vector dark solitons in a single mode fibre laser,” Laser Phys. Lett., 16 (8), 085110 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1612-202X/ab2804 Google Scholar

64. 

C. Zhao et al., “Observation of chaotic polarization attractors from a graphene mode locked soliton fiber laser,” Chin. Opt. Lett., 17 (2), 020012 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3788/COL Google Scholar

65. 

G. M. Wang et al., “Indium selenide as a saturable absorber for a wavelength-switchable vector-soliton fiber laser,” Opt. Mater. Express, 9 (2), 449 –456 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.9.000449 Google Scholar

66. 

D. Y. Tang et al., “Soliton interaction in a fiber ring laser,” Phys. Rev. E, 72 (1), 016616 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.72.016616 Google Scholar

67. 

A. Komarov et al., “Interaction of dissipative solitons under spectral and amplitude control of pulse wings in fiber lasers,” Proc. SPIE, 6612 661209 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.740172 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

68. 

N. Akhmediev et al., “Dissipative soliton interactions inside a fiber laser cavity,” Opt. Fiber Technol., 11 (3), 209 –228 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yofte.2005.02.003 Google Scholar

69. 

Y. F. Song et al., “Coexistence and interaction of vector and bound vector solitons in a dispersion-managed fiber laser mode locked by graphene,” Opt. Express, 24 (2), 1814 –1822 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.001814 Google Scholar

70. 

Y. Y. Luo et al., “Real-time access to the coexistence of soliton singlets and molecules in an all-fiber laser,” Opt. Lett., 44 (17), 4263 –4266 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.44.004263 Google Scholar

71. 

B. Ortac et al., “Observation of soliton molecules with independently evolving phase in a mode-locked fiber laser,” Opt. Lett., 35 (10), 1578 –1580 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.001578 Google Scholar

72. 

S. Chouli and P. Grelu, “Rains of solitons in a fiber laser,” Opt. Express, 17 (14), 11776 –11781 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.011776 Google Scholar

73. 

Y. F. Song et al., “Vector multi-soliton operation and interaction in a graphene mode-locked fiber laser,” Opt. Express, 21 (8), 10010 –10018 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.010010 Google Scholar

74. 

K. Sulimany et al., “Bidirectional soliton rain dynamics induced by Casimir-like interactions in a graphene mode-locked fiber laser,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 121 (13), 133902 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.133902 Google Scholar

75. 

C. Y. Bao, X. S. Xiao and C. X. Yang, “Soliton rains in a normal dispersion fiber laser with dual-filter,” Opt. Lett., 38 (11), 1875 –1877 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.38.001875 Google Scholar

76. 

D. Y. Tang, L. M. Zhao and B. Zhao, “Soliton collapse and bunched noise-like pulse generation in a passively mode-locked fiber ring laser,” Opt. Express, 13 (7), 2289 –2294 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPEX.13.002289 Google Scholar

77. 

Y. Takushima et al., “87 nm bandwidth noise-like pulse generation from erbium-doped fibre laser,” Electron. Lett., 41 (7), 399 –400 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1049/el:20058419 ELTNBK 0013-4759 Google Scholar

78. 

A. F. J. Runge, N. G. R. Broderick and M. Erkintalo, “Observation of soliton explosions in a passively mode-locked fiber laser,” Optica, 2 (1), 36 –39 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.2.000036 Google Scholar

79. 

C. Lecaplain et al., “Dissipative rogue wave generation in multiple-pulsing mode-locked fiber laser,” J. Opt., 15 (6), 064005 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8978/15/6/064005 Google Scholar

80. 

A. Zaviyalov et al., “Rogue waves in mode-locked fiber lasers,” Phys. Rev. A, 85 (1), 013828 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.85.013828 Google Scholar

81. 

C. Lecaplain et al., “Dissipative rogue waves through multi-pulse collisions in a fiber laser,” in Conf. Lasers and Electro-Opt. Eur. and Int. Quantum Electron. Conf. (CLEO Europe/IQEC), (2013). Google Scholar

82. 

A. F. J. Runge et al., “Raman rogue waves in a partially mode-locked fiber laser,” Opt. Lett., 39 (2), 319 –322 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.000319 Google Scholar

83. 

A. F. J. Runge et al., “Raman rogue waves in a long cavity passively mode-locked fiber laser,” in Conf. Lasers and Electro-Opt. (CLEO), (2014). Google Scholar

84. 

M. I. Afzal, K. Alameh and Y. T. Lee, “Blue-shifted rogue waves generation in normal dispersion fiber laser,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 27 (22), 2323 –2326 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2015.2462342 IPTLEL 1041-1135 Google Scholar

85. 

L. Gao et al., “Optical polarization rogue waves in fiber laser,” in Conf. Lasers and Electro-Opt. (CLEO), (2016). Google Scholar

86. 

H. Kbashi, S. A. Kolpakov and S. V. Sergeyev, “Temporal scaling of optical rogue waves in unidirectional ring fiber laser,” in 18th Int. Conf. Transparent Opt. Networks (ICTON), (2016). Google Scholar

87. 

S. A. Kolpakov, H. Kbashi and S. V. Sergeyev, “Dynamics of vector rogue waves in a fiber laser with a ring cavity,” Optica, 3 (8), 870 –875 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.3.000870 Google Scholar

88. 

S. A. Kolpakov, H. J. Kbashi and S. Sergeyev, “Slow optical rogue waves in a unidirectional fiber laser,” in Conf. Lasers and Electro-Opt., (2016). Google Scholar

89. 

J. S. Peng et al., “Rogue waves generation via nonlinear soliton collision in multiple-soliton state of a mode-locked fiber laser,” Opt. Express, 24 (19), 21256 –21263 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.021256 Google Scholar

90. 

Z. R. Cai et al., “Graphene-decorated microfiber photonic device for generation of rogue waves in a fiber laser,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 23 (1), 20 –25 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2016.2568741 Google Scholar

91. 

P. H. Hanzard et al., “Brillouin scattering-induced rogue waves in self-pulsing fiber lasers,” Sci. Rep., 7 45868 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45868 Google Scholar

92. 

H. Kbashi et al., “Vector rogue waves in a carbon nanotube mode-locked fiber laser,” in Conf. Lasers and Electro-Opt. Eur. & Eur. Quantum Electron. Conf. (CLEO/Europe-EQEC), (2017). Google Scholar

93. 

H. Kbashi et al., “Bright-dark rogue wave in mode-locked fibre laser,” Proc. SPIE, 10228 102280P (2017). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2265038 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

94. 

A. Klein et al., “Ultrafast rogue wave patterns in fiber lasers,” Optica, 5 (7), 774 –778 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.5.000774 Google Scholar

95. 

Z. C. Luo et al., “Optical rogue waves by random dissipative soliton buildup in a fiber laser,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 30 (20), 1803 –1806 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2018.2869857 IPTLEL 1041-1135 Google Scholar

96. 

P. Wang et al., “Dissipative rogue waves among noise-like pulses in a Tm fiber laser mode locked by a monolayer MoS2 saturable absorber,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 24 (3), 1800207 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2017.2749972 Google Scholar

97. 

S. Lee et al., “Intermittent burst of a super rogue wave in the breathing multi-soliton regime of an anomalous fiber ring cavity,” Opt. Express, 26 (9), 11447 –11457 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.011447 Google Scholar

98. 

S. Smirnov et al., “Generation of spatio-temporal extreme events in noise-like pulses NPE mode-locked fibre laser,” Opt. Express, 25 (19), 23122 –23127 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.023122 Google Scholar

99. 

S. Chen, J. M. Soto-Crespo and P. Grelu, “Dark three-sister rogue waves in normally dispersive optical fibers with random birefringence,” Opt. Express, 22 (22), 27632 –27642 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.027632 Google Scholar

100. 

S. Chen et al., “Optical rogue waves in parametric three-wave mixing and coherent stimulated scattering,” Phys. Rev. A, 92 (3), 033847 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.033847 Google Scholar

101. 

S. Chen, J. M. Soto-Crespo and P. Grelu, “Watch-hand-like optical rogue waves in three-wave interactions,” Opt. Express, 23 (1), 349 –359 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.000349 Google Scholar

102. 

S. V. Sergeyev et al., “Vector-resonance-multimode instability,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 118 (3), 033904 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.033904 Google Scholar

103. 

J. Peng and H. Zeng, “Dynamics of soliton molecules in a normal-dispersion fiber laser,” Opt. Lett., 44 (11), 2899 –2902 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.44.002899 Google Scholar

104. 

G. Genty et al., “Collisions and turbulence in optical rogue wave formation,” Phys. Lett. A, 374 (7), 989 –996 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2009.12.014 Google Scholar

105. 

M. Erkintalo, G. Genty and J. M. Dudley, “Giant dispersive wave generation through soliton collision,” Opt. Lett., 35 (5), 658 –660 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.000658 Google Scholar

106. 

M. Taki et al., “Third-order dispersion for generating optical rogue solitons,” Phys. Lett. A, 374 (4), 691 –695 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2009.11.058 Google Scholar

107. 

M. I. Kolobov et al., “Third-order dispersion drastically changes parametric gain in optical fiber systems,” Phys. Rev. A, 83 (3), 035801 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.035801 Google Scholar

108. 

M. Horowitz, Y. Barad and Y. Silberberg, “Noiselike pulses with a broadband spectrum generated from an erbium-doped fiber laser,” Opt. Lett., 22 (11), 799 –801 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.22.000799 Google Scholar

109. 

Y. Chen et al., “The formation of various multi-soliton patterns and noise-like pulse in a fiber laser passively mode-locked by a topological insulator based saturable absorber,” Laser Phys. Lett., 11 (5), 055101 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/1612-2011/11/5/055101 Google Scholar

110. 

A.-P. Luo et al., “Noise-like pulse trapping in a figure-eight fiber laser,” Opt. Express, 23 (8), 10421 –10427 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.010421 Google Scholar

111. 

Y. Mashiko, E. Fujita and M. Tokurakawa, “Tunable noise-like pulse generation in mode-locked Tm fiber laser with a SESAM,” Opt. Express, 24 (23), 26515 –26520 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.026515 Google Scholar

112. 

S. Liu et al., “Noise-like pulse generation from a thulium-doped fiber laser using nonlinear polarization rotation with different net anomalous dispersion,” Photonics Res., 4 (6), 318 –321 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.4.000318 Google Scholar

113. 

Z.-S. Deng et al., “Switchable generation of rectangular noise-like pulse and dissipative soliton resonance in a fiber laser,” Opt. Lett., 42 (21), 4517 –4520 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.42.004517 Google Scholar

114. 

Y. Jeong et al., “On the formation of noise-like pulses in fiber ring cavity configurations,” Opt. Fiber Technol., 20 (6), 575 –592 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yofte.2014.07.004 Google Scholar

115. 

L. Zhao et al., “120 nm bandwidth noise-like pulse generation in an erbium-doped fiber laser,” Opt. Commun., 281 (1), 157 –161 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2007.09.006 Google Scholar

116. 

L. Zhao and D. Tang, “Generation of 15-nJ bunched noise-like pulses with 93-nm bandwidth in an erbium-doped fiber ring laser,” Appl. Phys. B, 83 (4), 553 –557 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-006-2179-0 Google Scholar

117. 

G. Sobon et al., “Ultra-broadband dissipative soliton and noise-like pulse generation from a normal dispersion mode-locked Tm-doped all-fiber laser,” Opt. Express, 24 (6), 6156 –6161 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.006156 Google Scholar

118. 

H. Chen et al., “0.4  μJ, 7 kW ultrabroadband noise-like pulse direct generation from an all-fiber dumbbell-shaped laser,” Opt. Lett., 40 (23), 5490 –5493 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.40.005490 Google Scholar

119. 

S.-S. Lin, S.-K. Hwang and J.-M. Liu, “High-power noise-like pulse generation using a 1.56-μm all-fiber laser system,” Opt. Express, 23 (14), 18256 –18268 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.018256 Google Scholar

120. 

K. Goda and B. Jalali, “Dispersive Fourier transformation for fast continuous single-shot measurements,” Nat. Photonics, 7 (2), 102 –112 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.359 Google Scholar

121. 

Z.-R. Cai et al., “Graphene-decorated microfiber photonic device for generation of rogue waves in a fiber laser,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 23 (1), 20 –25 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2016.2568741 Google Scholar

122. 

L. Gao et al., “Coherence loss of partially mode-locked fibre laser,” Sci. Rep., 6 24995 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24995 Google Scholar

123. 

C. Lecaplain and P. Grelu, “Rogue waves among noiselike-pulse laser emission: an experimental investigation,” Phys. Rev. A, 90 (1), 013805 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.90.013805 Google Scholar

124. 

Z. W. Liu, S. M. Zhang and F. W. Wise, “Rogue waves in a normal-dispersion fiber laser,” Opt. Lett., 40 (7), 1366 –1369 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.40.001366 Google Scholar

125. 

A. V. Kir’yanov, Y. O. Barmenkov and M. V. Andres, “An experimental analysis of self-Q-switching via stimulated Brillouin scattering in an ytterbium doped fiber laser,” Laser Phys. Lett., 10 (5), 055112 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/1612-2011/10/5/055112 Google Scholar

126. 

Y. Panbhiharwala et al., “Investigation of temporal dynamics due to stimulated Brillouin scattering using statistical correlation in a narrow-linewidth cw high power fiber amplifier,” Opt. Express, 26 (25), 33409 –33417 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.033409 Google Scholar

127. 

D. Boukhaoui et al., “Influence of higher-order stimulated Brillouin scattering on the occurrence of extreme events in self-pulsing fiber lasers,” Phys. Rev. A, 100 (1), 013809 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.013809 Google Scholar

128. 

C. Lecaplain et al., “Dissipative rogue waves generated by chaotic pulse bunching in a mode-locked laser,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 108 (23), 233901 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.233901 Google Scholar

129. 

P. Grelu and N. Akhmediev, “Dissipative solitons for mode-locked lasers,” Nat. Photonics Rev., 6 (2), 84 –92 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2011.345 Google Scholar

130. 

L. Gao et al., “Polarization evolution dynamics of dissipative soliton fiber lasers,” Photonics Res., 7 (11), 1331 –1339 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.7.001331 Google Scholar

131. 

J. S. Peng and H. P. Zeng, “Build-up of dissipative optical soliton molecules via diverse soliton interactions,” Laser Photonics Rev., 12 (8), 1800009 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.v12.8 Google Scholar

132. 

H. J. Chen et al., “Dynamical diversity of pulsating solitons in a fiber laser,” Opt. Express, 27 (20), 28507 –28522 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.028507 Google Scholar

133. 

X. Q. Wang et al., “Real-time observation of dissociation dynamics within a pulsating soliton molecule,” Opt. Express, 27 (20), 28214 –28222 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.028214 Google Scholar

134. 

X. Q. Wang et al., “Transient behaviors of pure soliton pulsations and soliton explosion in an L-band normal-dispersion mode-locked fiber laser,” Opt. Express, 27 (13), 17729 –17742 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.017729 Google Scholar

135. 

Z. Wang et al., “Buildup of incoherent dissipative solitons in ultrafast fiber lasers,” Phys. Rev. Res., 2 (1), 013101 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013101 Google Scholar

136. 

M. Liu et al., “Successive soliton explosions in an ultrafast fiber laser,” Opt. Lett., 41 (6), 1181 –1184 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.41.001181 Google Scholar

137. 

Z. H. Wang et al., “Q-switched-like soliton bunches and noise-like pulses generation in a partially mode-locked fiber laser,” Opt. Express, 24 (13), 14709 –14716 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.014709 Google Scholar

138. 

X. M. Liu, D. Popa and N. Akhmediev, “Revealing the transition dynamics from Q switching to mode locking in a soliton laser,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 123 (9), 093901 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.093901 Google Scholar

139. 

J. S. Peng et al., “Breathing dissipative solitons in mode-locked fiber lasers,” Sci. Adv., 5 (11), eaax1110 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax1110 Google Scholar

140. 

K. Goda, K. K. Tsia and B. Jalali, “Serial time-encoded amplified imaging for real-time observation of fast dynamic phenomena,” Nature, 458 (7242), 1145 –1149 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07980 Google Scholar

141. 

K. Goda et al., “Theory of amplified dispersive Fourier transformation,” Phys. Rev. A, 80 (4), 043821 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.80.043821 Google Scholar

142. 

A. Klein et al., “Temporal depth imaging,” Optica, 4 (5), 502 –506 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.4.000502 Google Scholar

143. 

B. H. Kolner and M. Nazarathy, “Temporal imaging with a time lens,” Opt. Lett., 14 (12), 630 –632 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.14.000630 Google Scholar

144. 

A. Tikan et al., “Single-shot measurement of phase and amplitude by using a heterodyne time-lens system and ultrafast digital time-holography,” Nat. Photonics, 12 (4), 228 –234 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-018-0113-8 Google Scholar

145. 

P. Suret et al., “Single-shot observation of optical rogue waves in integrable turbulence using time microscopy,” Nat. Commun., 7 13136 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13136 Google Scholar

146. 

M. Narhi et al., “Real-time measurements of spontaneous breathers and rogue wave events in optical fibre modulation instability,” Nat. Commun., 7 13675 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13675 Google Scholar

147. 

A. Klein, H. Duadi and M. Fridman, “Ultrafast rogue waves in a vector field,” Proc. SPIE, 10903 109030D (2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2506994 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

148. 

B. Li et al., “Unveiling femtosecond rogue-wave structures in noise-like pulses by a stable and synchronized time magnifier,” Opt. Lett., 44 (17), 4351 –4354 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.44.004351 Google Scholar

149. 

S. Lee et al., “Experimental spatio-temporal analysis on the shot-to-shot coherence and wave-packet formation in quasi-mode-locked regimes in an anomalous dispersion fiber ring cavity,” Opt. Express, 25 (23), 28385 –28397 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.028385 Google Scholar

150. 

N. K. Fontaine et al., “Real-time full-field arbitrary optical waveform measurement,” Nat. Photonics, 4 (4), 248 –254 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2010.28 Google Scholar

151. 

O. Pottiez et al., “Statistical characterization of the internal structure of noiselike pulses using a nonlinear optical loop mirror,” Opt. Commun., 377 41 –51 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2016.05.029 Google Scholar

152. 

P. Ryczkowski et al., “Real-time full-field characterization of transient dissipative soliton dynamics in a mode-locked laser,” Nat. Photonics, 12 (4), 221 –227 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-018-0106-7 Google Scholar

153. 

S. V. Sergeyev et al., “Slow deterministic vector rogue waves,” Proc. SPIE, 9732 97320K (2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2211364 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

154. 

Q. Bao et al., “Atomic-layer graphene as a saturable absorber for ultrafast pulsed lasers,” Adv. Funct. Mater., 19 (19), 3077 –3083 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.v19:19 Google Scholar

155. 

L. Kong et al., “Black phosphorus as broadband saturable absorber for pulsed lasers from 1  μm to 2.7  μm wavelength,” Laser Phys. Lett., 13 (4), 045801 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1612-2011/13/4/045801 Google Scholar

156. 

J. Li et al., “Black phosphorus: a two-dimension saturable absorption material for mid-infrared Q-switched and mode-locked fiber lasers,” Sci. Rep., 6 30361 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30361 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

157. 

J. Liu et al., “Polarization domain wall pulses in a microfiber-based topological insulator fiber laser,” Sci. Rep., 6 29128 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29128 Google Scholar

158. 

Y. Song et al., “Vector soliton fiber laser passively mode locked by few layer black phosphorus-based optical saturable absorber,” Opt. Express, 24 (23), 25933 –25942 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.025933 Google Scholar

159. 

Z. Wang et al., “Harmonic mode-locking and wavelength-tunable Q-switching operation in the graphene-Bi2Te3 heterostructure saturable absorberbased fiber laser,” Opt. Eng., 55 (8), 081314 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.55.8.081314 Google Scholar

160. 

P. Li et al., “Two-dimensional CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite nanosheets for ultrafast pulsed fiber lasers,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 9 (14), 12759 –12765 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b01709 AAMICK 1944-8244 Google Scholar

161. 

B. Guo et al., “Sub-200 fs soliton mode-locked fiber laser based on bismuthene saturable absorber,” Opt. Express, 26 (18), 22750 –22760 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.022750 Google Scholar

162. 

X. Zhu et al., “TiS2-based saturable absorber for ultrafast fiber lasers,” Photonics Res., 6 (10), C44 –C48 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.6.000C44 Google Scholar

163. 

Y. M. Chang et al., “Multilayered graphene efficiently formed by mechanical exfoliation for nonlinear saturable absorbers in fiber mode-locked lasers,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 97 (21), 211102 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3521257 Google Scholar

164. 

Z. Sun et al., “Ultrafast fiber laser mode-locked by graphene based saturable absorber,” in Conf. Lasers and Electro-Opt. (CLEO) and Quantum Electron. and Laser Sci. Conf. (QELS), (2010). Google Scholar

165. 

L. M. Zhao et al., “Dissipative soliton operation of an ytterbium-doped fiber laser mode locked with atomic multilayer graphene,” Opt. Lett., 35 (21), 3622 –3624 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.003622 Google Scholar

166. 

K. Wu et al., “High-performance mode-locked and Q-switched fiber lasers based on novel 2D materials of topological insulators, transition metal dichalcogenides and black phosphorus: review and perspective (invited),” Opt. Commun., 406 214 –229 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2017.02.024 Google Scholar

167. 

N. A. A. Kadir et al., “Transition metal dichalcogenides (WS2 and MoS2) saturable absorbers for mode-locked erbium-doped fiber lasers,” Chin. Phys. Lett., 34 (1), 014202 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/34/1/014202 Google Scholar

168. 

B. H. Chen et al., “Q-switched fiber laser based on transition metal dichalcogenides MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, and WSe2,” Opt. Express, 23 (20), 26723 –26737 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.026723 Google Scholar

169. 

Y. F. Song et al., “Few-layer antimonene decorated microfiber: ultra-short pulse generation and all-optical thresholding with enhanced long term stability,” 2D Mater., 4 (4), 045010 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/aa87c1 Google Scholar

170. 

J. Guo et al., “Two-dimensional tellurium-polymer membrane for ultrafast photonics,” Nanoscale, 11 (13), 6235 –6242 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR00736A NANOHL 2040-3364 Google Scholar

171. 

Y. Song et al., “Lead monoxide: a promising two-dimensional layered material for applications in nonlinear photonics in the infrared band,” Nanoscale, 11 12595 –12602 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9nr03167g NANOHL 2040-3364 Google Scholar

172. 

T. Chai et al., “Few-layer bismuthene for ultrashort pulse generation in a dissipative system based on an evanescent field,” Nanoscale, 10 (37), 17617 –17622 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR03068E NANOHL 2040-3364 Google Scholar

173. 

D. Buccoliero et al., “Midinfrared optical rogue waves in soft glass photonic crystal fiber,” Opt. Express, 19 (19), 17973 –17978 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.017973 Google Scholar

174. 

L. Liu et al., “Mid-infrared rogue wave generation in chalcogenide fibers,” Proc. SPIE, 10100 1010020 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2251950 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

175. 

A. E. Akosman and M. Y. Sander, “Route towards extreme optical pulsation in linear cavity ultrafast fibre lasers,” Sci. Rep., 8 13385 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31725-7 Google Scholar

176. 

G. Pu et al., “Intelligent programmable mode-locked fiber laser with a human-like algorithm,” Optica, 6 (3), 362 –369 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.6.000362 Google Scholar

177. 

M. Narhi et al., “Machine learning analysis of extreme events in optical fibre modulation instability,” Nat. Commun., 9 4923 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07355-y Google Scholar

178. 

W. H. Renninger and F. W. Wise, “Optical solitons in graded-index multimode fibres,” Nat. Commun., 4 1719 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2739 Google Scholar

179. 

L. G. Wright, D. N. Christodoulides and F. W. Wise, “Spatiotemporal mode-locking in multimode fiber lasers,” Science, 358 (6359), 94 –97 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0831 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

180. 

H. Q. Qin et al., “Observation of soliton molecules in a spatiotemporal mode-locked multimode fiber laser,” Opt. Lett., 43 (9), 1982 –1985 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.43.001982 Google Scholar

181. 

Y. H. Ding et al., “Multiple-soliton in spatiotemporal mode-locked multimode fiber lasers,” Opt. Express, 27 (8), 11435 –11446 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.011435 Google Scholar

182. 

U. Tegin and B. Ortac, “Spatiotemporal instability of femtosecond pulses in graded-index multimode fibers,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 29 (24), 2195 –2198 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2017.2769343 IPTLEL 1041-1135 Google Scholar

183. 

K. Krupa et al., “Spatial beam self-cleaning in multimode fibres,” Nat. Photonics, 11 (4), 237 –241 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2017.32 Google Scholar

184. 

G. Lopez-Galmiche et al., “Visible supercontinuum generation in a graded index multimode fiber pumped at 1064 nm,” Opt. Lett., 41 (11), 2553 –2556 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.41.002553 Google Scholar

185. 

C. Liu et al., “Triggering extreme events at the nanoscale in photonic seas,” Nat. Phys., 11 (4), 358 –363 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3263 Google Scholar

186. 

S. H. Chen et al., “Super chirped rogue waves in optical fibers,” Opt. Express, 27 (8), 11370 –11384 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.011370 Google Scholar

187. 

C. J. Gibson, A. M. Yao and G. L. Oppo, “Optical rogue waves in vortex turbulence,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 116 (4), 043903 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.043903 Google Scholar

188. 

J. Leach et al., “Quantum correlations in optical angle-orbital angular momentum variables,” Science, 329 (5992), 662 –665 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1190523 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

189. 

Z. Shen et al., “Trapping and rotating of a metallic particle trimer with optical vortex,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 109 (24), 241901 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4971981 Google Scholar

190. 

M. P. J. Lavery et al., “Detection of a spinning object using light’s orbital angular momentum,” Science, 341 (6145), 537 –540 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239936 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

191. 

H. R. Ren et al., “On-chip noninterference angular momentum multiplexing of broadband light,” Science, 352 (6287), 805 –809 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf1112 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

192. 

X. D. Qiu et al., “Optical vortex copier and regenerator in the Fourier domain,” Photonics Res., 6 (6), 641 –646 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.6.000641 Google Scholar

193. 

T. Wang et al., “Generation of femtosecond optical vortex beams in all-fiber mode-locked fiber laser using mode selective coupler,” J. Lightwave Technol., 35 (11), 2161 –2166 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2017.2676241 Google Scholar

194. 

Y. Shen et al., “Radially polarized cylindrical vector beam generation in all-fibre narrow linewidth single-longitudinal-mode laser,” Laser Phys. Lett., 16 (5), 055101 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1612-202X/ab141f Google Scholar

195. 

Y. Han et al., “Controllable all-fiber generation/conversion of circularly polarized orbital angular momentum beams using long period fiber gratings,” Nanophotonics, 7 (1), 287 –293 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2017-0047 Google Scholar

196. 

Y. H. Zhao et al., “Mode converter based on the long-period fiber gratings written in the two-mode fiber,” Opt. Express, 24 (6), 6186 –6195 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.006186 Google Scholar

197. 

Z. W. Xie et al., “Integrated (de)multiplexer for orbital angular momentum fiber communication,” Photonics Res., 6 (7), 743 –749 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.6.000743 Google Scholar

198. 

D. Mao et al., “Optical vortex fiber laser based on modulation of transverse modes in two mode fiber,” APL Photonics, 4 (6), 060801 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5094599 Google Scholar

199. 

F. Leo et al., “Temporal cavity solitons in one-dimensional Kerr media as bits in an all-optical buffer,” Nat. Photonics, 4 (7), 471 –476 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2010.120 Google Scholar

200. 

Y. Wang et al., “Universal mechanism for the binding of temporal cavity solitons,” Optica, 4 (8), 855 –863 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.4.000855 Google Scholar

201. 

J. K. Jang et al., “Observation of dispersive wave emission by temporal cavity solitons,” Opt. Lett., 39 (19), 5503 –5506 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.005503 Google Scholar

202. 

K. E. Webb et al., “Experimental observation of coherent cavity soliton frequency combs in silica microspheres,” Opt. Lett., 41 (20), 4613 –4616 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.41.004613 Google Scholar

Biography

Yufeng Song received his BS degree in optoelectronics from Tianjin University, China, in 2008 and his PhD from the School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, in 2014. From 2013 to 2015, he worked as a research fellow at Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. From 2015 to 2017, he was a postdoctoral research fellow at Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China. He is currently an assistant professor at Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China. His current research focuses on the nonlinear fiber optics and all optical signal processing.

Zhenhong Wang received his BS degree from Tianjin University of Technology in 2013 and received his PhD from Nankai University in 2018. Currently, he is a research assistant at Shenzhen University. His PhD research focus investigated the nonlinear soliton dynamics of passively mode-locked fiber lasers. Now, his research interest is to fabricate photonic devices based on innovative 2-D materials and apply them to the ultrafast fiber lasers.

Cong Wang received his BS degree from Shandong Normal University in 2019 and is a doctoral student at Shenzhen University. His research interest focuses on 2-D nanomaterials, optical modulators, and nonlinear optics.

Krassimir Panajotov received his BS, PhD, and DSc degrees in physics from Sofia University in 1982, 1988, and 2002, respectively. Since 1982, he has been with the Institute of Solid State Physics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, and as a full professor since 2005. Since 2005, he is 10% ZAP at Vrije Universiteit Brussel. His research activities are in nonlinear optics, semiconductor lasers, photonic crystal devices, nonlinear laser dynamics, and optical solitons. In these fields, he has published more than 200 SCI-listed journal papers.

Han Zhang received his BS degree from Wuhan University in 2006 and received his PhD from Nanyang Technological University in 2010. His current research is on the ultrafast and nonlinear photonics of 2-D materials. He is currently the director of the Shenzhen Key Laboratory of 2-D Materials and Devices and Shenzhen Engineering Laboratory of Phosphorene and Optoelectronics, Shenzhen University.

CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Yufeng Song, Zhenhong Wang, Cong Wang, Krassimir Panajotov, and Han Zhang "Recent progress on optical rogue waves in fiber lasers: status, challenges, and perspectives," Advanced Photonics 2(2), 024001 (9 April 2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.AP.2.2.024001
Received: 4 December 2019; Accepted: 14 February 2020; Published: 9 April 2020
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 74 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
Fiber lasers

Ocean optics

Solitons

Mode locking

Ultrafast phenomena

Complex systems

Oscilloscopes

Back to Top