|
1.IntroductionSentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has become the standard of care for patients diagnosed with breast cancer, replacing axillary lymph node dissection. Biopsy of the lymph nodes directly draining the tumor area can accurately stage cancer to guide therapeutic decisions. Ultrasound (US) guidance of minimally invasive interventions is widely performed, leading to improved treatment outcomes and shorter recovery.1, 2 Real-time, noninvasive, nonionizing, and portable US imaging is currently the primary method for guiding targeted needle biopsies and nerve blockings.3, 4 Photoacoustic (PA) imaging is a nonionizing and noninvasive hybrid imaging technique that combines strong optical absorption contrast with high ultrasonic spatial resolution.5 Since ultrasonic scattering is 2 to 3 orders of magnitude less than optical scattering, PA imaging can break through the fundamental depth limitations of pure optical imaging.6 Using intrinsic contrasts such as hemoglobin or melanin, PA imaging can provide both morphological and functional information.5 Moreover, using molecularly targeted exogenous contrast agents, it can also provide molecular information.5 We previously reported in vivo detection of lymph nodes in rats using a raster-scanning tabletop PA imaging system. Methylene blue,7 indocyanine green (ICG),8 and gold nanoparticles9 were used as contrast agents. However, this system was relatively slow for clinical applications ( for a field of view), and its imaging head was not handheld. We also reported in vivo PA and US mapping of SLNs in rats using a US array, but the light delivery was not handheld.10 In this paper, for the first time to our knowledge, we report noninvasive in vivo mapping of deeply positioned ICG-dyed SLNs in rats using a PA imaging system adapted from a commercial US array system. A US probe integrated with optical fiber bundles for light delivery enabled handheld scanning as in ultrasonagraphy.11, 12 ICG uptake in SLNs was confirmed by fluorescence imaging. Furthermore, both real-time PA imaging [1 frame per second (fps)] and US imaging successfully guided needle insertion in vivo. 2.Methods and MaterialsFigure 1 shows an experimental schematic of the integrated PA and US imaging system, adapted from a clinical US imaging system10 (iU22, Philips Healthcare). Raw per-channel PA and US data were both acquired through the modified channel board architecture and transferred to a custom-made data acquisition computer for display and postprocessing. The data acquisition system was synchronized with laser firing. Fourier-beam-formed PA images were displayed at a frame rate of . However, the frame rate can be improved to , limited by the current laser repetition rate. US images were captured at . For this study, we used a linear array US probe (L8-4, Philips Healthcare) with a nominal bandwidth of . Light from a tunable dye laser (NS, Sirah), pumped by a -switched Nd:YAG laser (PRO-350-10, Newport) with a pulse duration and a pulse repetition rate, was coupled to a multimode fiber bundle (CB18043, Fiberguide). The fiber bundle was bifurcated and physically integrated with the US probe, enabling handheld scanning. The two optical beams were obliquely incident on the tissue surface as rectangles ( along the and axes from each bundle). An optical wavelength of , close to the peak optical absorption wavelength of ICG ( in albumin), was utilized. Light fluence on the skin was less than , well below the American National Standards Institute safety limits.13 Tabletop PA imaging systems and the previously reported study using this modified Philips system required a water tank, which is clinically undesirable. Here, US gel was applied to directly couple the PA probe to the surface of the tissue. Animal handling was performed according to the guidelines on the care and use of laboratory animals at Washington University in St. Louis. Sprague Dawley rats were initially anesthetized using a mixture of ketamine and xylazine . To test the clinical feasibility of this technique on humans, we intentionally increased the imaging depth by laying of chicken tissue atop the rat. After depilation in the left axillary region, we first obtained a control PA image before the injection of ICG. After intradermally injecting of ICG into the left forepaw, we acquired a series of PA images to monitor the ICG uptake in the SLN dynamically. Then, we demonstrated PA image-guided needle insertion in vivo. Here, we mechanically fixed the PA imaging probe to avoid motion artifacts. After PA imaging, in vivo fluorescence imaging was performed with a time-domain diffuse optical imaging system (eXplore Optix, Advance Research Technologies) to confirm ICG uptake. Then, ex vivo fluorescence imaging was performed to confirm uptake in the lymph nodes using a planar reflectance imaging system (Kodak IS4000MM, Carestream Health) with excitation and detection. 3.Results and DiscussionTo investigate the feasibility of PA and US mapping of SLNs with ICG, we imaged the left axillary region in a rat before and after ICG injection. A control PA B-scan image was acquired before injection [Fig. 2 ]. Immediately after injection, ICG accumulation in the deeply positioned SLN was observed photoacoustically. Video 1 shows the dynamic accumulation of ICG in the SLN. The PA image of the ICG-dyed SLN acquired at postinjection [Fig. 2] shows that ICG accumulation enhanced the PA signal in the SLN by (standard deviation). Figure 2, created by overlaying the PA and US images, shows both morphological information and functional information (ICG uptake in the SLN). For comparison, the PA images in Figs. 2, 2, 2 are displayed in the same dynamic range. A snapshot of the US-guided needle insertion is shown in Fig. 2. As the needle was inserted into the chicken tissue in vivo, it was ultrasonically tracked in real time (Video 2 ), but the SLN was not detected ultrasonically. The needle progression could also be detected photoacoustically, as shown in Fig. 2 and Video 3 . PA imaging was able to detect the SLN clearly. Comparison of the two videos clearly shows that PA imaging has much higher contrast than US imaging in needle tracking under the current experimental condition. We quantified the image contrasts of the needles in both images within the regions of interest indicated by the yellow dotted boxes in Figs. 2 and 2. The PA image contrast of the needle was (standard deviation), whereas the US image contrast was (standard deviation). However, in neither case was the tracking of the needle optimized and both imaging modalities were highly operator-dependant. 10.1117/1.3469829.110.1117/1.3469829.210.1117/1.3469829.3Fluorescence images obtained after PA imaging confirmed ICG uptake in the SLN [Fig. 3 ]. Further, we imaged fluorescently three dissected lymph nodes (LNs) from the left axillary region [Fig. 3]. Only the first draining node, the sentinel node, generated strong fluorescence. 4.ConclusionsWe developed a noninvasive, nonionizing, real-time, and handheld PA and US imaging system using a modified clinical US imaging system. In vivo mapping of rat SLNs at an imaging depth of was successfully accomplished following ICG injection. Further, PA imaging enabled guided needle insertion with strong contrast in vivo. This technique is highly translatable to clinical applications for image-guided SLN biopsy, nerve blockings, and many others. AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (Grants R01 EB000712, R01 EB008085, and U54 CA136398—the Network for Translational Research). L.V.W. has a financial interest in Microphotoacoustics, Inc., and in Endra, Inc., which, however, did not support this work. T.N.E, L.J., and M.D.P are employees of Philips Research. ReferencesF. Laurent, V. Latrabe, B. Vergier, M. Montaudon, J. M. Vernejoux, and J. Doubrez,
“CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy of pulmonary nodules smaller than : results with an automated coaxial cutting needle,”
Clin. Radiol., 55
(4), 281
–287
(2000). https://doi.org/10.1053/crad.1999.0368 0009-9260 Google Scholar
F. K. Wacker, S. Vogt, A. Khamene, J. A. Jesberger, S. G. Nour, D. R. Elgort, F. Sauer, J. L. Duerk, and J. S. Lewin,
“An augmented reality system for MR image-guided needle biopsy: initial results in a swine model,”
Radiology, 238
(2), 497
–504
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2382041441 0033-8419 Google Scholar
B. D. Fornage, M. J. Faroux, and A. Simatos,
“Breast masses: US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy,”
Radiology, 162 409
–414
(1987). 0033-8419 Google Scholar
R. Knobloch, J. Weber, Z. Varga, H. Feiber, A. Heidenreich, and R. Hofmann,
“Bilateral fine-needle administered local anaesthetic nerve block for pain control during TRUS-guided multi-core prostate biopsy: a prospective randomised trial,”
Eur. Urol., 41
(5), 508
–514
(2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0302-2838(02)00072-6 0302-2838 Google Scholar
C. Kim, C. Favazza, and L. V. Wang,
“In vivo photoacoustic tomography of chemicals: high-resolution functional and molecular optical imaging at new depths,”
Chem. Rev., 110
(5), 2756
–2782
(2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr900266s 0009-2665 Google Scholar
B. W. Zeff, B. R. White, H. Dehghani, B. L. Schlaggar, and J. P. Culver,
“Retinotopic mapping of adult human visual cortex with high-density diffuse optical tomography,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 104
(29), 12169
–12174
(2007). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611266104 0027-8424 Google Scholar
K. H. Song, E. W. Stein, J. A. Margenthaler, and L. V. Wang,
“Noninvasive photoacoustic identification of sentinel lymph nodes containing methylene blue in vivo in a rat model,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 13
(5), 054033
(2008). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2976427 1083-3668 Google Scholar
C. Kim, K. H. Song, F. Gao, and L. V. Wang,
“Noninvasive dual-modality in vivo mapping by using indocyanine green in rats—volumetric spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging and planar fluorescence imaging,”
Radiology, 255 442
–450
(2010). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10090281 0033-8419 Google Scholar
K. H. Song, C. Kim, C. M. Cobley, Y. Xia, and L. V. Wang,
“Near-infrared gold nanocages as a new class of tracers for photoacoustic sentinel lymph node mapping on a rat model,”
Nano Lett., 9
(1), 183
–188
(2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl802746w 1530-6984 Google Scholar
T. N. Erpelding, C. Kim, M. Pramanik, L. Jankovic, K. Maslov, Z. Guo, J. A. Margenthaler, M. D. Pashley, and L. V. Wang,
“Sentinel lymph nodes in the rat: Noninvasive photoacoustic and US imaging with a clinical US system,”
Radiology, 256 102
–110
(2010). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10091772 0033-8419 Google Scholar
S. Y. Emelianov, S. R. Aglyamov, J. Shah, S. Sethuraman, W. G. Scott, R. Schmitt, M. Motamedia, A. Karpiouk, and A. A. Oraevsky,
“Combined ultrasound, optoacoustic and elasticity imaging,”
Proc. SPIE, 5320 101
–112
(2004). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.537155 0277-786X Google Scholar
M. P. Fronheiser, S. A. Ermilov, H. P. Brecht, A. Conjusteau, R. Su, K. Mehta, and A. A. Oraevsky,
“Real-time optoacoustic monitoring and three-dimensional mapping of a human arm vasculature,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 15
(2), 021305
(2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3370336 1083-3668 Google Scholar
, Standard Z136.1-2000,
(2002) Google Scholar
|