Open Access
17 May 2021 Intraoperative molecular imaging clinical trials: a review of 2020 conference proceedings
Feredun Azari, Gregory Kennedy, Elizabeth Bernstein, Constantinos G. Hadjipanayis, Alexander L. Vahrmeijer, Barbara L. Smith, Eben L. Rosenthal, Baran D. Sumer, Jie Tian, Eric R. Henderson, Amy Lee, Quyen Nguyen, Summer L. Gibbs, Brian W. Pogue, Daniel A. Orringer, Cleopatra Charalampaki, Linda W. Martin, Janos L. Tanyi, Major K. Lee, John Y. K. Lee, Sunil Singhal
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Significance: Surgery is often paramount in the management of many solid organ malignancies because optimal resection is a major factor in disease-specific survival. Cancer surgery has multiple challenges including localizing small lesions, ensuring negative surgical margins around a tumor, adequately staging patients by discriminating positive lymph nodes, and identifying potential synchronous cancers. Intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI) is an emerging potential tool proposed to address these issues. IMI is the process of injecting patients with fluorescent-targeted contrast agents that highlight cancer cells prior to surgery. Over the last 5 to 7 years, enormous progress has been achieved in tracer development, near-infrared camera approvals, and clinical trials. Therefore, a second biennial conference was organized at the University of Pennsylvania to gather surgical oncologists, scientists, and experts to discuss new investigative findings in the field. Our review summarizes the discussions from the conference and highlights findings in various clinical and scientific trials.

Aim: Recent advances in IMI were presented, and the importance of each clinical trial for surgical oncology was critically assessed. A major focus was to elaborate on the clinical endpoints that were being utilized in IMI trials to advance the respective surgical subspecialties.

Approach: Principal investigators presenting at the Perelman School of Medicine Abramson Cancer Center’s second clinical trials update on IMI were selected to discuss their clinical trials and endpoints.

Results: Multiple phase III, II, and I trials were discussed during the conference. Since the approval of 5-ALA for commercial use in neurosurgical malignancies, multiple tracers and devices have been developed to address common challenges faced by cancer surgeons across numerous specialties. Discussants also presented tracers that are being developed for delineation of normal anatomic structures that can serve as an adjunct during surgical procedures.

Conclusions: IMI is increasingly being recognized as an improvement to standard oncologic surgical resections and will likely advance the art of cancer surgery in the coming years. The endpoints in each individual surgical subspecialty are varied depending on how IMI helps each specialty solve their clinical challenges.

CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Feredun Azari, Gregory Kennedy, Elizabeth Bernstein, Constantinos G. Hadjipanayis, Alexander L. Vahrmeijer, Barbara L. Smith, Eben L. Rosenthal, Baran D. Sumer, Jie Tian, Eric R. Henderson, Amy Lee, Quyen Nguyen, Summer L. Gibbs, Brian W. Pogue, Daniel A. Orringer, Cleopatra Charalampaki, Linda W. Martin, Janos L. Tanyi, Major K. Lee, John Y. K. Lee, and Sunil Singhal "Intraoperative molecular imaging clinical trials: a review of 2020 conference proceedings," Journal of Biomedical Optics 26(5), 050901 (17 May 2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.5.050901
Received: 19 February 2021; Accepted: 28 April 2021; Published: 17 May 2021
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 30 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
Tumors

Surgery

Cancer

Clinical trials

Tissues

Imaging systems

Luminescence

Back to Top