Open Access
14 November 2023 Heavy water coupling gel for short-wave infrared photoacoustic imaging
Christopher M. Salinas, Eric Reichel, Abhiman Gupta, Russell S. Witte
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Significance

Changes in lipid, water, and collagen (LWC) content in tissue are associated with numerous medical abnormalities (cancer, atherosclerosis, and Alzheimer’s disease). Standard imaging modalities are limited in resolution, specificity, and/or penetration for quantifying these changes. Short-wave infrared (SWIR) photoacoustic imaging (PAI) has the potential to overcome these challenges by exploiting the unique optical absorption properties of LWC > 1000 nm.

Aim

This study’s aim is to harness SWIR PAI for mapping LWC changes in tissue. The focus lies in devising a reflection-mode PAI technique that surmounts current limitations related to SWIR light delivery.

Approach

To enhance light delivery for reflection-mode SWIR PAI, we designed a deuterium oxide (D2O, “heavy water”) gelatin (HWG) interface for opto-acoustic coupling, intended to significantly improve light transmission above 1200 nm.

Results

HWG permits light delivery >1 mJ up to 1850 nm, which was not possible with water-based coupling (>1 mJ light delivery up to 1350 nm). PAI using the HWG interface and the Visualsonics Vevo LAZR-X reveals a signal increase up to 24 dB at 1720 nm in lipid-rich regions.

Conclusions

By overcoming barriers related to light penetration, the HWG coupling interface enables accurate quantification/monitoring of biomarkers like LWC using reflection-mode PAI. This technological stride offers potential for tracking changes in chronic diseases (in vivo) and evaluating their responses to therapeutic interventions.

1.

Introduction

Changes in tissue content of lipids, water, and collagen (LWC) play a role in the development of numerous diseases and their response to therapy. For example, deficiencies in lipid transport and structure in the brain are linked to early-onset Alzheimer’s disease.1,2 Also, changes in lipid content and collagen are associated with arterial blockages and plaque buildup in atherosclerosis.3 Finally, compositional changes of lipids and water in the tumor microenvironment are known to occur during development and progression of certain types of cancer.4 It is, therefore, highly desirable to develop noninvasive technology capable of detecting and monitoring these compositional changes. Standard imaging modalities, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), ultrasound (US) and most optical methods are limited in their ability to quantify these changes at high resolution deep into tissue;5 MRI and CT lack the sensitivity and specificity to quantify LWC with sub-mm precision. High-resolution optical techniques like fluorescence (two photon and confocal) and optical CT are limited in their depth of penetration by the optical diffusion limit (1  mm). While pulse echo (PE) ultrasound benefits from sub-mm spatial resolution, it contains poor contrast for discerning different types of soft tissue structures and molecules since the images rely on small differences in acoustic impedance. Therefore, none of these modalities are ideal in terms of resolution, penetration, specificity, field of view, and acquisition time.

Photoacoustic imaging (PAI), on the other hand, benefits from high resolution, high contrast, and real-time acquisition compared to traditional biomedical imaging modalities. PAI depends on a local and transient heating effect offering greater penetration (at least 10 mm) than other optical methods that depend on coherent illumination. Traditional PAI uses visible and near infrared (VIS/NIR, 400 to 1000 nm) light to detect endogenous chromophores like hemoglobin and absorbing dyes and nanoparticles like indocyanine green and gold nanorods.68 Other optical methods have been employed in this waveband to quantify LWC content in tissue,911 however, at superficial tissue depths <1  mm. Additionally, these absorbers are notoriously challenging to quantify in the VIS/NIR window due to their relatively weak optical absorption.12 Several commercially available PAI systems13,14 are only sensitive to chromophores whose absorption exceeds 0.1  cm1. This leads to images with poor signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), limited depth penetration and/or requires light that exceeds the safety limit.1517 Conversely, PAI in the short-wave infrared (SWIR, 1200 to 2000 nm) holds promise for quantifying and mapping endogenous absorbers like LWC due to their much higher absorption (Fig. 1) and unique spectral features in this band.

Fig. 1

Optical absorption coefficients for lipid, water, and collagen between 700 and 1800 nm.1820

JBO_28_11_116001_f001.png

Fig. 2

SWIR absorption coefficients for water (H2O) and heavy water (D2O) between 1200 and 2000 nm. Half-value propagation distance dramatically decreases above 1200 nm for H2O compared to D2O.20

JBO_28_11_116001_f002.png

Techniques that employ PAI in the SWIR have previously demonstrated capability to probe lipid and collagen changes in diseases such as atherosclerosis and cancer.21,22 While lipid and collagen profiles in these diseases are well documented, rigorous quantification of lipid changes during Alzheimer’s progression is an ongoing endeavor23,24 that SWIR PAI could address.25,26 However, the strong optical absorption of traditional optical and acoustic coupling media (e.g., water, oils, and rubbers) above 1200 nm have posed a significant challenge for reflection-mode (i.e., light and sound delivery from the same direction) PAI in the SWIR, which is desirable for in vivo imaging.2730 Probing the optical properties of biological tissues is a necessary requirement for studies pertaining to LWC and other absorbers in the SWIR.31 In addition to poor optical transmission, strong dispersion and ultrasound attenuation of oil-based rubbers (e.g., humimic and polydimethylsiloxane) degrades PA and PE image quality, especially at high frequencies >20  MHz.32 The lack of an efficient coupling medium for reflection-mode PAI in the SWIR, therefore, poses a significant challenge for in vivo studies designed to detect and monitor endogenous contrast like LWC and other biomarkers of chronic diseases, such as cancer, atherosclerosis, and Alzheimer’s. A coupling agent that exhibits favorable optical and acoustic transmission properties would aid and improve such studies by increasing the overall signal throughput across a wide range of wavelengths, leading to more accurate characterization of constituents, such as LWC with strong absorption in the SWIR. Deuterium oxide (D2O), commonly known as “heavy water,” is an isotope of H2O and exhibits unique and favorable properties for enabling reflection-mode PAI in the SWIR. Fig. 2 highlights the optical clarity of heavy water when compared to normal water, which is used as a base for many coupling materials. While several studies have demonstrated advantages of D2O coupling for PAI,30,3336 there is a lack of a thoroughly well-characterized D2O-based gelatin to facilitate reflection-mode PAI in the SWIR. This study addresses this limitation by developing and assessing the performance of a gel form of D2O for optimal delivery of light and ultrasound to enable reflection-mode PAI in the SWIR with a penetration of several millimeters into tissue. Compared to liquid, a gelatin interface simplifies coupling to the sample for reflection-mode imaging and eliminates the potential of leakage or formation of air bubbles. A gelatin coupling medium can also be reused and reshaped to conform to different imaging configurations. In addition, the advantage of tunability of gelatin stiffness further provides potential for construction of impedance matching layers, which can drastically improve ultrasound propagation to and from an imaging sample.37 The acoustic impedance of heavy water is approximately 1.64 MRayl at standard temperature and pressure, which is 10% higher than that of normal water given its increased density (1.11  g/cm3) yet similar speed of sound.38 With the average acoustic impedance of soft tissue of 1.54  MRayl,39 heavy water coupling should provide similar ultrasound transmission to that of water (1.48 MRayl).

Not solely limited to endogenous chromophores, the advancement of reflection-mode PA systems in the SWIR would also allow for detecting and monitoring exogenous contrast agents with strong and potentially tunable absorption peaks in the SWIR.31 In this paper, we report a gelatin-based heavy water opto-acoustic coupling medium and interface designed for reflection-mode PE and PA imaging in the SWIR. We predict that a heavy water gelatin (HWG) will have a similar transmission profile to its liquid counterpart, which would enable in vivo PA studies above 1200 nm that require optical and acoustic coupling to the animal or human subject.

2.

Methods

2.1.

Fabrication of Heavy Water Gellan

Commercially acquired D2O (United Nuclear, 99% purity) and gellan gum (Modernist Pantry, “F,” low-acyl) were used for preparing HWG. Gellan gum was chosen as the gelling agent, as opposed to standard agarose, due to its better optical transparency and efficient acoustic transmission properties as internally studied and reported in literature by the co-authors.40 Gellan gum powder (between 2% and 3% w/w) was poured slowly into D2O preheated to 80°C and mixed with a stir bar to ensure homogeneity. The solution was then degassed to remove air bubbles before it was poured into a molding apparatus designed for reflection-mode PA and PE imaging. The mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature and ready for imaging studies. Because the stiffness and viscosity of the resulting HWG could be altered by adjusting the concentration of gellan gum, we determined that a concentration of 2.25% w/w gellan gum was suitable for imaging experiments because it provided mechanical stability while remaining somewhat flexible when coupling to the samples. The thickness of the gelatin coupling samples was 5.0  mm for reflection-mode imaging.

2.2.

Optical and Acoustic Characterization

A commercial ultrasound and PA imaging system (Vevo 3100/LAZR-X, VisualSonics) was first used in transmission-mode to quantify the optical loss through sections of HWG in the SWIR. Two small cubic samples (10×10×5  mm) of HWG were prepared (2% and 3% w/w) within a molding container displayed in Fig. 3(a). The container was placed within the output path of the fiber bundles, where acoustic coupling was then achieved from below via contact with a water reservoir and a 25 MHz US linear array (MX250, VisualSonics). Black electrical tape was used as a broadband optical absorber and inserted between the molding container and water reservoir as a baseline for estimating PA signal loss as a function of wavelength through the coupling medium. The spectrum of the tape was first measured through air in transmission-mode from 1200 to 2000 nm. The PA spectrum was then compared differentially to the broadband spectrum of the tape obtained through an optical path length defined by the thickness of HWG. Differences in these spectra result in the transmission loss corresponding to the new optical pathlength (i.e., HWG samples at 2% and 3% w/w). This method was repeated for samples of H2O gellan gum (WG) to compare the optical loss with HWG. The energy exiting the fiber bundle through the coupling media was also measured with a commercial energy meter (Coherent EnergyMax).

Fig. 3

(a) Transmission-mode set up of the Vevo LAZR-X using the MX250 probe with LFB = laser fiber bundles, MC = 3D printed molding container, CM = coupling medium, BA = broadband absorber/electrical tape, WR = water reservoir, and US= linear array US probe. 2% and 3% w/w HWG samples are illuminated from above, and the resulting PA spectrum of the broadband absorber is used to quantify optical loss through the optical path. Acoustic coupling is achieved via the water reservoir in contact with the US array. (b) Standard reflection-mode setup with the coupling medium inserted between the probe and sample with LI = laser illumination pattern and S = sample.

JBO_28_11_116001_f003.png

To determine whether HWG coupling affected acoustic propagation, we also calculated the point spread function (PSF) for standard PE imaging using the reflection-mode setup, as depicted in Fig. 3(b), using samples of HWG, WG and humimic medical rubber as coupling. Before the gel solidified, graphite powder (Loudwolf, 44  μm diameter) was distributed into the solution and allowed to cool to room temperature. These PSF images were used to estimate the axial resolution of the system through each coupling medium. Axial full-width half-maximum (FWHM) was chosen for measurement as it most closely depends on the US wavelength and dispersion (i.e., frequency-dependent attenuation of the US signal), unlike lateral and elevational resolution, which can depend on additional factors, including aperture size and focal distance. All PE and PA analyses were done on processed image data provided by the Vevo LAZR-X.

2.3.

Sample Preparation

A lipid/water phantom composed of 20% lipid shortening (Cisco), 75% diH2O, and 5% w/w agarose was prepared to demonstrate the capabilities of HWG in reflection-mode PAI operating in the SWIR compared to a WG system. The solution of lipid, water, and agarose is brought to 80°C via hotplate, mixed with a stir bar, and left to cool and solidify at room temperature. HWG and WG coupling agents are molded for reflection-mode imaging with the 25 MHz probe and fiber bundle as described previously. Spectral PA data was collected at 5 nm intervals from 1200 to 2000 nm through both HWG and WG to quantify differences in SNR and detection. As a final validation of this reflection-mode PAI in the SWIR, a fresh sample of bovine muscle was used to demonstrate detection of intra-muscular lipid in the SWIR with HWG. Sections of locally sourced bovine tissue were cut into 10×10×10  mm cubes for full spectrum reflection-mode PA and PE imaging. The PA signal amplitude as a function of depth was estimated by integrating across the lipid/water phantom in the lateral (i.e., azimuth) direction for both HWG and WG datasets.

3.

Results

3.1.

Optical and Acoustic Characterization

Transmission mode data is tabulated and graphed in Fig. 4. The relative PA signals across the band are normalized to black tape for comparing each coupling medium. It is observed that the PA transmission spectrum of HWG (2% and 3% w/w) is similar to the Beer–Lambert signal for 99% heavy water with the same optical pathlength.

Fig. 4

(a) Coupling media PA transmission results. Transmission of HWG and WG at 2% and 3% w/w gellan concentrations are displayed, along with D2O (100% concentration, pure), D2O (99% concentration, 1% H2O) and H2O (100% concentration, pure) calculated transmission via absorption coefficients20 through an identical pathlength Δz=10  mm. (b) Laser energy measurements of the reflection-mode setup through samples of HWG and WG (thickness 5.0  mm) with the horizontal line denoting the cut-off energy threshold of 1 mJ.

JBO_28_11_116001_f004.png

Energy measurements of the LAZR-X fiber bundle through 2% w/w HWG and WG are displayed in Fig. 4. We set a criterion that laser illumination reaching the samples with <1  mJ energy was insufficient for producing PA images with adequate SNR. The WG coupling agent, for example, strongly absorbed light above 1350 nm. Light delivery through HWG, on the other hand, maintained sufficient light delivery to the sample (>1  mJ) across the entire SWIR region up to 1850 nm. PA signals were too weak or undetectable outside these cutoff wavelengths. An assessment of the stability of HWG transmission between two time points was also conducted. The HWG sample used in Fig. 4 was tested 60 days after storage in an airtight zip bag stored in a refrigerator at 4°C. Energy measurements after 60 days yielded no significant transmission change (average difference: 1.06±0.49  mJ), demonstrating the stability of HWG with proper storage.

Figure 5 describes the axial spatial resolution for PE images obtained from the sample with fine graphite particles. Analysis of the PSFs reveals similar axial spatial resolution through WG (69.0±1.4  μm) and HWG (69.7±3.8  μm), indicating that HWG preserves the full acoustic bandwidth of the propagating ultrasound waves similar to a water-based coupling agent. This is not the case with humimic rubber, as the acoustic properties are affected by dispersion and the strong attenuation at high ultrasound frequencies,32 resulting in a degradation in axial resolution using the 25 MHz linear array.

Fig. 5

Cross sectional PE images at 25 MHz through graphite phantom in different coupling media. The embedded fine graphite particles served as point scatterers for evaluating the acoustic propagation though the different coupling media: humimic medical rubber (black), HWG (blue), and WG (red). The curves represent the axial PSFs with the FWHMs representing the axial resolutions. Green scale bar denotes 1 mm. Starting depth for each B-mode image is 3 mm from the transducer head.

JBO_28_11_116001_f005.png

3.2.

Lipid/Water Phantom Imaging

PA images of the phantoms using the HWG coupling agent were obtained up to 1850 nm as predicted from the absorption coefficients and transmission measurements. On the contrary, water-based gels provided PA images of the sample up to only 1350  nm, as depicted in Fig. 6. Signals received past this WG cutoff do not contain any PA information of the sample due to insufficient light reaching the surface. PA signal above the noise floor can be seen using HWG at 1720 nm up to depths of 5.0  mm with most of the contrast at this wavelength generated from lipids. PA surface spectra are plotted for the samples in Fig. 7, demonstrating signals above noise for HWG across this full range, including distinct peaks of lipid/water.

Fig. 6

Reflection-mode PA images of lipid/water phantom (S) at peak absorption wavelengths of 1220 nm (lipid), 1450 nm, (water), and 1720 nm (lipid) through 4.5 mm of WG and HWG coupling. Yellow scale bar is 1 mm in both depth and lateral directions. Dashed green line indicates the coupling/sample boundary. No useful PA images were obtained through WG above 1350  nm due to the strong absorption of water coupling.

JBO_28_11_116001_f006.png

Fig. 7

(a) Amplitude of PA signals from the surface of the lipid/water phantom through 5 mm thick HWG and WG coupling; the dark blue plot corrects for wavelength-dependent absorption through HWG (divides raw spectrum by % transmission of HWG at 2% w/w as previously recorded). (b) Published SWIR absorption spectra of lipid and water.18,20 The cut-off energy for detecting PA signals from the sample was defined as 1 mJ for this study (denoted by the red dotted vertical line). Acceptable wavelengths through WG were 1200 to 1350 nm, and 1200 to 1850 nm through HWG.

JBO_28_11_116001_f007.png

At 1220 nm, a 7.5 dB signal increase is observed at the surface of the phantom using HWG compared to WG. This agrees closely with what is expected via the absorption plots in Fig. 4 through a similar optical pathlength at 1220 nm. At a depth of 4.5 mm into the sample, a 4.6 dB signal increase is observed, indicating at depth an SNR increase of nearly 2× is apparent with HWG coupling compared to WG coupling at shorter SWIR wavelengths. For this sample, the noise floor is reached through HWG at a depth of 5  mm. At 1720 nm, a 24 dB increase in maximum surface signal is observed when imaged through HWG and fluence corrected as opposed to WG (at the noise floor at this wavelength due to insufficient light delivery to the sample), illustrating the extended usable wavelength range for HWG-enabled PA systems compared to standard coupling methods.

Figure 8 displays the PA imaging cross-section of the bovine tissue sample along with spectral data. Even at 1220 nm (obtainable with WG), the ratio of peak PA signal in the green and yellow regions of interest between the HWG and WG images is 3.04× and 1.41×, respectively, indicating a broad increase in SNR when using HWG coupling as opposed to WG.

Fig. 8

(a) Photograph of bovine muscle sample cross section displaying the approximate slice presented in the PA images. (b) Reflection-mode PA images at absorption peaks of lipid (1220 and 1720 nm) with HWG coupling. Green and yellow regions indicate corresponding pockets of intramuscular fat between the photograph and PA images. The dotted white line indicates the surface of the sample and boundary with coupling medium. Each image is scaled to its own maximum value above the 0 dB noise floor. (c) Average PA spectrum of encircled regions of intramuscular fat using HWG as coupling medium with added fluence correction and noise floor indicated by black dotted line.

JBO_28_11_116001_f008.png

4.

Discussion

HWG enables PAI of tissue samples across a broad spectral range in the SWIR (1200 to 1850 nm), whereas WG is limited to wavelengths <1350  nm with poor SNR (Fig. 4). It was anticipated that the predicted transmission spectrum of HWG would be similar to that of heavy water in liquid form at the equivalent concentration (99% pure). The results align with this prediction, as illustrated in Fig. 4. Slight shifts in the transmission peaks in the WG sample compared to baseline are likely due to the bonding mechanism of the low-acyl gellan gum, which has been reported previously.41,42 This effect is also observed with HWG, indicating the bonding effects of gellan and heavy water are similar to that of WG. Akin to water-based coupling, HWG has minimal loss of high frequency acoustic waves, preserving spatial resolution for PE imaging, as shown in Fig. 5. HWG enables the study of tissue constituents in reflection-mode PA setups without sacrificing spatial resolution (Fig. 5). Oil-based rubbers like humimic gels have much stronger acoustic attenuation at high ultrasound frequencies (>20  MHz) due to dispersion and absorption.32 In the context of Fig. 5, this implies the PSF produced for humimic gel should be wider in spatial width, which is corroborated with our results using the 25 MHz linear array. The near identical results for HWG and WG signify no loss of PE axial resolution (70  μm) through the coupling medium, which is necessary for HWG to be applied to studies with simultaneous high-specificity and high-resolution mapping of constituents, including dual modality PE and PA imaging and spectroscopy in the SWIR. Finally, we demonstrated reflection-mode PAI in the SWIR using the HWG as a solid coupling medium designed for in vivo imaging on a commercial scanning system. The HWG interface provides a considerable boost in SNR with penetration into the samples of 5.0  mm at 1720 nm. Lipid pool regions in ex vivo bovine tissue exhibit a >12  dB increase in the PA signal at 1220 and 1720 nm. This further demonstrates the potential impact of the HWG interface for in vivo reflection-mode ultrasound PA imaging studies for detecting and tracking biomarkers like LWC, which have strong and unique optical absorption signatures in the SWIR.

The high-resolution, high-specificity study of tissue constituents such as LWC can henceforth be aided by the addition of HWG to standard reflection-mode PA systems. Current and past systems27,28,43,44 used to study constituents may find that the implementation of HWG will result in improved SNR, along with allowing for a larger usable optical bandwidth for spectral characterization and/or unmixing. Other designs that would benefit from improved opto-acoustic coupling include fiber bundle arrangements and optoacoustic in-line reflectors that generally require coupling media. A limitation of this study was that no direct validation with histology was performed to quantify the presence of LWC. Studies which implement spectral-unmixing algorithms24,4548 to identify LWC and other constituents in tissue may find a benefit in the increased SNR at chosen wavelengths provided through HWG; however, future validation studies are needed to determine the accuracy of these HWG-enabled spectral unmixing algorithms in the SWIR. One potential drawback of heavy water coupling is its relatively high cost compared to regular water that primarily depends on purity and volume. For this study, we used heavy water with 99% purity with a typical cost of 100 ml ranging from $100 to 300 USD49 with some cost fluctuation depending on market value.50

Furthermore, clutter effects of PA-induced US waves launched from the sample surface were not explored. This phenomenon is well documented51,52 and known to add discrepancies in PA images, which are not representative of standard PA contrast mechanisms. To further characterize HWG’s potential as a reflection-mode coupling medium, future research should delve into the effects of PA-induced US waves on tissue as a function of coupling absorption. Future work will also include the 3D capability of commercial systems like the Vevo LAZR-X to obtain 3D PA and PE volume data with the HWG retaining contact with the tissue sample or animal. Reflection-mode PA systems with increased capabilities also have promise in clinical environments to aid in the diagnosis of superficial skin lesions relating to skin cancer or tracking the progression of wound healing.7,53,54 Efforts are underway to incorporate HWG into a novel closed-loop reflection-mode PA system tailored for imaging skin lesions and monitoring wound healing. A patent application has been issued for the HWG interface mechanism as described in this article.55 Along with obvious general applications towards PAI, HWG may be used in ultrasound modulation therapy studies; HWG implemented within a proper system design could enable real-time and efficient optical imaging for changes in function during ultrasound modulation therapy.

5.

Conclusions

In this study, HWG was manufactured and tested as a medium to enable reflection-mode PAI in the SWIR and compared with more common coupling of water-based gelatin and humimic rubber. The HWG interface demonstrated major advantages of optical transmission in the SWIR without sacrificing spatial resolution. We demonstrated reflection-mode PAI for mapping intramuscular lipids in bovine tissue samples at depths of at least 5 mm, which would not be feasible with standard coupling. We envision the interface for reflection-mode PAI in the SWIR to enable in vivo studies to quantify and track biomarkers like LWC that are known to change during wound healing and progression of chronic diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease and skin cancer, as well as their response to therapy.

Disclosures

Christopher Salinas, Eric Reichel, and Russell Witte are inventors on a patent application related to the HWG interface. Russell Witte is also CEO of ElectroSonix LLC, which is not associated with this work.

Data Availability

All data in support of the findings of this paper are available within the paper.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (Grant Nos. P30CA023074 and R01AR074627). The authors would like to acknowledge the Translational Biomedical Imaging Resource (TBIR) and High Frequency Ultrasound (HFUS) Core Facility at the University of Arizona for access to the Vevo 3100 and LAZR-X. The authors would also like to extend thanks to Matthew O’Donnell for feedback on an early draft of this article.

References

1. 

A. Zarrouk et al., “Lipid biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease,” Curr. Alzheimer Res., 15 (4), 303 –312 https://doi.org/10.2174/1567205014666170505101426 (2018). Google Scholar

2. 

Y.-C. Kao et al., “Lipids and Alzheimer’s disease,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21 (4), 1505 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041505 1422-0067 (2020). Google Scholar

3. 

M. D. Rekhter, “Collagen synthesis in atherosclerosis: too much and not enough,” Cardiovasc. Res., 41 (2), 376 –384 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6363(98)00321-6 CVREAU 0008-6363 (1999). Google Scholar

4. 

L. M. Butler et al., “Lipids and cancer: emerging roles in pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapeutic intervention,” Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 159 245 –293 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2020.07.013 ADDREP 0169-409X (2020). Google Scholar

5. 

B. Kim et al., “A brief review of non-invasive brain imaging technologies and the near-infrared optical bioimaging,” Appl. Microsc., 51 9 https://doi.org/10.1186/s42649-021-00058-7 (2021). Google Scholar

6. 

Y. S. Chen et al., “Miniature gold nanorods for photoacoustic molecular imaging in the second near-infrared optical window,” Nat. Nanotechnol., 14 465 –472 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0392-3 NNAABX 1748-3387 (2019). Google Scholar

7. 

D. Ghosh et al., “Temporal evaluation of efficacy and quality of tissue repair upon laser-activated sealing,” Bioeng. Transl. Med., 8 (2), e10412 https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10412 (2022). Google Scholar

8. 

Z. Chaudhary et al., “Efficient photoacoustic imaging using indocyanine green (ICG) loaded functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles,” Biomater. Sci., 7 (12), 5002 –5015 https://doi.org/10.1039/C9BM00822E (2019). Google Scholar

9. 

L. Li et al., “Label-free photoacoustic tomography of whole mouse brain structures ex vivo,” Neurophotonics, 3 (3), 035001 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.3.3.035001 (2016). Google Scholar

10. 

J. Shi et al., “High-resolution, high-contrast mid-infrared imaging of fresh biological samples with ultraviolet-localized photoacoustic microscopy,” Nat. Photonics, 13 609 –615 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-019-0441-3 NPAHBY 1749-4885 (2019). Google Scholar

11. 

E. Hysi et al., “Photoacoustic imaging of kidney fibrosis for assessing pretransplant organ quality,” JCI Insight, 5 (10), e136995 https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.136995 (2020). Google Scholar

12. 

A. Sun et al., “Evaluation of visible NIR-I and NIR-II light penetration for photoacoustic imaging in rat organs,” Opt. Express, 28 9002 –9013 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.389714 OPEXFF 1094-4087 (2020). Google Scholar

13. 

, “TriToTM small animal whole body photoacoustic and fluorescence molecular imaging platform,” https://scintica.com/product/imaging/photoacoustic/ (n.d.). Google Scholar

14. 

, “Vevo LAZR-X high resolution multi-modal in-vivo imaging platform,” https://www.visualsonics.com/sites/default/files/Vevo%20LAZR-X_A4Brochure_LowRes_MKT02906%20v1.1.pdf (2017). Google Scholar

15. 

J. Huang et al., “Empirical assessment of laser safety for photoacoustic-guided liver surgeries,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 12 (3), 1205 –1216 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.415054 BOEICL 2156-7085 (2021). Google Scholar

16. 

I. Steinberg et al., “Photoacoustic clinical imaging,” Photoacoustics, 14 77 –98 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2019.05.001 (2019). Google Scholar

17. 

S. Park et al., “Bi2se3 nanoplates for contrast-enhanced photoacoustic imaging at 1064 nm,” Nanoscale, 10 (44), 20548 –20558 https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR05672B NANOHL 2040-3364 (2018). Google Scholar

18. 

R. L. P. Van Veen et al., “Determination of VIS-NIR absorption coefficients of mammalian fat with time- and spatially resolved diffuse reflectance and transmission spectroscopy,” in Biomed. Topical Meet. OSA Tech. Digest, SF4 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1364/BIO.2004.SF4 Google Scholar

19. 

S. K. V. Sekar et al., “Diffuse optical characterization of collagen absorption from 500 to 1700 nm,” (2004). Google Scholar

20. 

A. Tam and C. Patel, “Optical absorptions of light and heavy water by laser optoacoustic spectroscopy,” Appl. Opt., 18 (19), 3348 –3358 https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.18.003348 APOPAI 0003-6935 (1979). Google Scholar

21. 

E. Brown, J. Brunker and S. E. Bohndiek, “Photoacoustic imaging as a tool to probe the tumour microenvironment,” Dis. Models Mech., 12 (7), dmm039636 https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.039636 (2019). Google Scholar

22. 

H. Chew, V. A. Solomon and A. N. Fonteh, “Involvement of lipids in Alzheimer’s disease pathology and potential therapies,” Front. Physiol., 11 598 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00598 FROPBK 0301-536X (2020). Google Scholar

23. 

Y. Tang et al., “From light to sound: photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging in fundamental research of Alzheimer’s disease,” OBM Neurobiol., 4 (2), 1 –21 https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2002056 (2020). Google Scholar

24. 

C. M. Salinas, E. Reichel and R. S. Witte, “Short-wave photoacoustic lipid imaging (SW-PALI) for detection of early-onset Alzheimer’s disease,” in IEEE Int. Ultrason. Symp. (IUS), (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ius54386.2022.9957485 Google Scholar

25. 

J. Yao and L. V. Wang, “Sensitivity of photoacoustic microscopy,” Photoacoustics, 2 (2), 87 –101 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2014.04.002 (2014). Google Scholar

26. 

B. Lundberg, “Chemical composition and physical state of lipid deposits in atherosclerosis,” Atherosclerosis, 56 (1), 93 –110 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9150(85)90087-5 ATHSBL 0021-9150 (1985). Google Scholar

27. 

J. Shi et al., “Hybrid optical parametrically-oscillating emitter at 1930 nm for volumetric photoacoustic imaging of water content,” eLight, 2 6 https://doi.org/10.1186/s43593-022-00014-2 (2022). Google Scholar

28. 

C. Cano et al., “Blind spectral unmixing for characterization of plaque composition based on multispectral photoacoustic imaging,” Sci. Rep., 13 4119 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31343-y SRCEC3 2045-2322 (2023). Google Scholar

29. 

Y. Li and Z. Chen, “Multimodal intravascular photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging,” Biomed. Eng. Lett., 8 (2), 193 –201 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-018-0061-8 (2018). Google Scholar

30. 

J. Hui et al., “High-speed intravascular photoacoustic imaging at 17 Mm with a KTP-based OPO,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 6 (11), 4557 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.6.004557 BOEICL 2156-7085 (2015). Google Scholar

31. 

P. K. Upputuri and M. Pramanik, “Photoacoustic imaging in the second near-infrared window: a review,” J. Biomed. Opt., 24 (4), 040901 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.4.040901 JBOPFO 1083-3668 (2019). Google Scholar

32. 

Q. Liu et al., “Study on the relationship between structure and acoustic performance of NBR composite materials,” Polymer, 258 125284 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2022.125284 POLMAG 0032-3861 (2022). Google Scholar

33. 

A. Buehler et al., “Imaging of fatty tumors: appearance of subcutaneous lipomas in optoacoustic images,” J. Biophotonics, 10 (8), 983 –989 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201600274 (2017). Google Scholar

34. 

Y. Goh et al., “Biochemical “decoding” of breast ultrasound images with optoacoustic tomography fusion: first-in-human display of lipid and collagen signals on breast ultrasound,” Photoacoustics, 27 100377 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2022.100377 (2022). Google Scholar

35. 

M. Wu et al., “Real-time volumetric lipid imaging in vivo by intravascular photoacoustics at 20 frames per second,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 8 943 –953 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.000943 BOEICL 2156-7085 (2017). Google Scholar

36. 

L. Lin et al., “High-speed three-dimensional photoacoustic computed tomography for preclinical research and clinical translation,” Nat. Commun., 12 (1), 882 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21232-1 NCAOBW 2041-1723 (2021). Google Scholar

37. 

V. T. Rathod, “A review of acoustic impedance matching techniques for piezoelectric sensors and transducers,” Sensors, 20 (14), 4051 https://doi.org/10.3390/s20144051 SNSRES 0746-9462 (2020). Google Scholar

38. 

S. Lago, P. A. Giuliano Albo and G. Cavuoto, “Speed of sound measurements in deuterium oxide at temperatures between (276.97 and 363.15) K and at pressures up to 210 MPa,” Fluid Phase Equilibria, 506 112401 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2019.112401 FPEQDT 0378-3812 (2020). Google Scholar

39. 

H. Azhari, “Appendix A,” Basics of Biomedical Ultrasound for Engineers, John Wiley & Sons( (2010). Google Scholar

40. 

E. Reichel et al., “Transparent gellan gum as an efficient coupling media for photoacoustic imaging applications,” in IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 1 –4 (2022). Google Scholar

41. 

Y. Lu, X. Zhao and S. Fang, “Characterization, antimicrobial properties and coatings application of gellan gum oxidized with hydrogen peroxide,” Foods, 8 (1), 31 https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8010031 (2019). Google Scholar

42. 

Y. Huang et al., “Near infrared spectroscopy: a new tool for studying physical and chemical properties of polysaccharide gels,” Carbohydr. Polym., 53 (3), 281 –288 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(03)00067-5 CAPOD8 0144-8617 (2003). Google Scholar

43. 

Y. Wang et al., “A portable three-dimensional photoacoustic tomography system for imaging of chronic foot ulcers,” Quant. Imaging Med. Surg., 9 (5), 799 –799 https://doi.org/10.21037/qims.2019.05.02 (2019). Google Scholar

44. 

L. G. Montilla et al., “Real-time photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging: a simple solution for clinical ultrasound systems with linear arrays,” Phys. Med. Biol., 58 (1), N1 –N12 https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/1/N1 PHMBA7 0031-9155 (2013). Google Scholar

45. 

C. M. Salinas, E. Reichel and R. S. Witte, “Short-wave infrared photoacoustic spectroscopy for lipid and water detection,” in IEEE Int. Ultrason. Symp. (IUS), 1 –4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/IUS52206.2021.9593904 Google Scholar

46. 

H. Yoon, G. P. Luke and S. Y. Emelianov, “Impact of depth-dependent optical attenuation on wavelength selection for spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging,” Photoacoustics, 12 46 –54 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2018.10.001 (2018). Google Scholar

47. 

A. Q. Bauer et al., “Quantitative photoacoustic imaging: correcting for heterogeneous light fluence distributions using diffuse optical tomography,” J. Biomed. Opt., 16 (9), 096016 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3626212 JBOPFO 1083-3668 (2011). Google Scholar

48. 

M. Kim et al., “Correction of wavelength-dependent laser fluence in swept-beam spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging with a hand-held probe,” Photoacoustics, 19 100192 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100192 (2020). Google Scholar

49. 

Sigma Aldrich, “Deuterium oxide: product comparison guide,” https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/US/en/substance/deuteriumoxide20037789200 (). Google Scholar

50. 

, “Price for heavy water (deuterium oxide) in the United States - 2023 - charts and tables,” https://www.indexbox.io/search/price-for-heavy-water-deuterium-oxide-the-united-states/ (2024). Google Scholar

51. 

M. Frenz and M. Jaeger, “Optimization of tissue irradiation in optoacoustic imaging using a linear transducer: theory and experiments,” Proc. SPIE, 6856 68561Y https://doi.org/10.1117/12.768830 PSISDG 0277-786X (2008). Google Scholar

52. 

M. Jaeger et al., “Reduction of background in optoacoutic image sequences obtained under tissue deformation,” J. Biomed. Opt., 14 (5), 054011 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3227038 JBOPFO 1083-3668 (2009). Google Scholar

53. 

C.-G. Song et al., “Investigation of photoacoustic imaging for monitoring of wound healing under a layer of blood with different coagulation,” in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Awareness Sci. and Technol. (iCAST), 336 –338 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAwST.2011.6163166 Google Scholar

54. 

X. Lin, Y. Shen and L. Wang, “Multi-scale photoacoustic assessment of wound healing using chitosan-graphene oxide hemostatic sponge,” Nanomaterials, 11 (11), 2879 https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11112879 (2021). Google Scholar

55. 

R. S. Witte, C. Salinas and E. Reichel, “Optical and acoustic coupling materials, systems, and methods of use,” (2022). Google Scholar

Biography

Christopher M. Salinas is a current PhD student at the James C. Wyant College of Optical Sciences at the University of Arizona. He received his BS in physics from his hometown school of the University of Nevada, Reno. Upon completion of his PhD, he aspires to become an optical engineer, where he can contribute his knowledge to developing highly efficient and cutting-edge imaging systems for a wide range of applications.

Eric Reichel: Biography is not available.

Abhiman Gupta is currently pursuing a bachelor of science in biomedical engineering at the University of Arizona in Tucson, AZ, USA, expecting to graduate in May 2024. Since his sophomore year, he has been engaged in research that focuses on photoacoustic, optical, and ultrasound imaging. After completing his undergraduate studies, he plans to attend graduate school, where he intends to continue his research in the field of medical imaging.

Russell S. Witte received the BS degree (Hons.) in physics from The University of Arizona in 1993, and PhD degree in bioengineering from Arizona State University in 2002. Since 2007, he has served as professor of medical imaging, biomedical engineering and optical sciences at the University of Arizona, where his research team develops cutting-edge hybrid imaging modalities that integrate light, ultrasound, microwaves, and electricity to address grand challenges in biology, medicine, and engineering.

CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Christopher M. Salinas, Eric Reichel, Abhiman Gupta, and Russell S. Witte "Heavy water coupling gel for short-wave infrared photoacoustic imaging," Journal of Biomedical Optics 28(11), 116001 (14 November 2023). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.28.11.116001
Received: 14 August 2023; Accepted: 5 October 2023; Published: 14 November 2023
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
Short wave infrared radiation

Reflection

Tissues

Photoacoustic imaging

Infrared imaging

Infrared radiation

Infrared photography

Back to Top