Paper
28 September 2011 Wave-particle duality? not in optical computing
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Metaphysics has only one absolute requirement: It must account for the known physics. But many metaphysics account for light and they cannot all be right. We have only one metaphysical principle that is widely accepted (Einstein's minimum simplicity rule) and it gives no one answer. Even if we could enforce it, how would we prove its validity without a (meta)3principle? People like me who work with light are never confused about whether we are dealing with a particle or a wave. I find it useful to view light in terms even broader than the usual wave-particle description. I add a third kind of wave that is not measurable but also not restricted by the physics of the measurable. I find it difficult to account for light any other way.
© (2011) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
H. John Caulfield "Wave-particle duality? not in optical computing", Proc. SPIE 8121, The Nature of Light: What are Photons? IV, 81210L (28 September 2011); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.891277
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Particles

Photons

Physics

Light wave propagation

Radio propagation

Optical computing

Electromagnetic radiation

Back to Top