As semiconductor processes have been developed into nanometer-level processes, the transition from photo- to EUV-processes has accelerated for nano-pattern production. In line with this trend, the need for analytical techniques of sub-nanometer defects in 3D shapes and chemical components is significantly increasing. Correcting various types of defects in the EUV process becomes essential. We have developed defect characterization and defect-repairing techniques using nano-machining and AFM technology for the EUV and optical photomasks. The defects identified in the mask are primarily divided into a soft defect, which occurs during the process and sits randomly in the mask, and a hard defect, which mainly indicates a damaged or altered pattern. Based on the inline AFM system introduced as semiconductor inspection equipment, I would like to introduce the potential technologies to analyze the 3D shape and mechanical and chemical properties of defects occurring at the EUV or photomasks.
As the feature size is shrinking in the foundries, the need for inline high resolution surface profiling with versatile capabilities is increasing. One of the important areas of this need is chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) process. We introduce a new generation of atomic force profiler (AFP) using decoupled scanners design. The system is capable of providing small-scale profiling using XY scanner and large-scale profiling using sliding stage. Decoupled scanners design enables enhanced vision which helps minimizing the positioning error for locations of interest in case of highly polished dies. Non-Contact mode imaging is another feature of interest in this system which is used for surface roughness measurement, automatic defect review, and deep trench measurement. Examples of the measurements performed using the atomic force profiler are demonstrated.
Single crystal silicon wafers are the fundamental elements of semiconductor manufacturing industry. The wafers produced by Czochralski (CZ) process are very high quality single crystalline materials with known defects that are formed during the crystal growth or modified by further processing. While defects can be unfavorable for yield for some manufactured electrical devices, a group of defects like oxide precipitates can have both positive and negative impacts on the final device. The spatial distribution of these defects may be found by scattering techniques. However, due to limitations of scattering (i.e. light wavelength), many crystal defects are either poorly classified or not detected. Therefore a high throughput and accurate characterization of their shape and dimension is essential for reviewing the defects and proper classification. While scanning electron microscopy (SEM) can provide high resolution twodimensional images, atomic force microscopy (AFM) is essential for obtaining three-dimensional information of the defects of interest (DOI) as it is known to provide the highest vertical resolution among all techniques [1]. However AFM’s low throughput, limited tip life, and laborious efforts for locating the DOI have been the limitations of this technique for defect review for 300 mm wafers. To address these limitations of AFM, automatic defect review AFM has been introduced recently [2], and is utilized in this work for studying DOI on 300 mm silicon wafer. In this work, we carefully etched a 300 mm silicon wafer with a gaseous acid in a reducing atmosphere at a temperature and for a sufficient duration to decorate and grow the crystal defects to a size capable of being detected as light scattering defects [3]. The etched defects form a shallow structure and their distribution and relative size are inspected by laser light scattering (LLS). However, several groups of defects couldn’t be properly sized by the LLS due to the very shallow depth and low light scattering. Likewise, SEM cannot be used effectively for post-inspection defect review and classification of these very shallow types of defects. To verify and obtain accurate shape and three-dimensional information of those defects, automatic defect review AFM (ADR AFM) is utilized for accurate locating and imaging of DOI. In ADR AFM, non-contact mode imaging is used for non-destructive characterization and preserving tip sharpness for data repeatability and reproducibility. Locating DOI and imaging are performed automatically with a throughput of many defects per hour. Topography images of DOI has been collected and compared with SEM images. The ADR AFM has been shown as a non-destructive metrology tool for defect review and obtaining three-dimensional topography information.
Defects on a reticle are inspected, reviewed, and repaired by different tools. They are located by automated optical inspection (AOI); however, if the characteristic size of defects is similar to that of light and electron beam wavelengths, they are often unclassified or misclassified by AOI. Atomic force microscopes (AFM) along with electron microscopes are used for investigating defects located by AOI to distinguish false defects from real defects and effectively classify them. Both AFM and electron microscopes provide high resolution images. However, electron microscopy is known to be destructive and have less accuracy in 3rd dimension measurement compared to AFM [1]. On the other hand, AFM is known to have low throughput and limited tip life in addition to requiring significant effort to finding the defects. These limitations emanate from having to perform multiple large scans to find the defect locations, to compensate for stage coordinate inaccuracies, and to correct the mismatch between the AFM and the AOI tools.
In this work we introduce automatic defect review (ADR) AFM for defect study and classification of EUV mask reticles that overcomes the aforementioned limitations of traditional AFM. This metrology solution is based on an AFM configuration with decoupled Z and XY scanners that makes it possible to collect large survey images with minimum out of plane motion. To minimize the stage errors and mismatch between the AFM and the AOI coordinates, the coordinates of fiducial markers are used for coarse alignment. In addition, fine alignment of the coordinates is performed using enhanced optical vision on marks on the reticle. The ADR AFM is used to study a series of phase defects identified by an AOI tool on a reticle. Locating the defects, imaging, and defect classification are performed using the ADR automation software and with the throughput of several defects per hour. In order to preserve tip life and data consistency, AFM imaging is performed in non-contact mode. The ADR AFM provides high throughput, high resolution, and non-destructive means for obtaining 3D information for defect review and classification. Therefore this technology can be used for in-line defect review and classification for mask repair.
While feature size in lithography process continuously becomes smaller, defect sizes on blank wafers become more
comparable to device sizes. Defects with nm-scale characteristic size could be misclassified by automated optical
inspection (AOI) and require post-processing for proper classification. Atomic force microscope (AFM) is known to
provide high lateral and the highest vertical resolution by mechanical probing among all techniques. However, its low
throughput and tip life in addition to the laborious efforts for finding the defects have been the major limitations of this
technique. In this paper we introduce automatic defect review (ADR) AFM as a post-inspection metrology tool for
defect study and classification for 300 mm blank wafers and to overcome the limitations stated above. The ADR AFM
provides high throughput, high resolution, and non-destructive means for obtaining 3D information for nm-scale defect
review and classification.
To fulfil advanced process control requirements for 1X node production, the semiconductor industry must cope with multiple parallel metrology requirements such as resolution, precision and accuracy enhancement in all directions to answer to new 3D integrated circuit fabrication methods. At the 1D and 2D levels, CDSEM and Scatterometry techniques are the workhorse techniques for production and process control. However, for process control of 3D devices and high resolution patterning such as direct self-assembly lithography, reference metrology is necessary to maintain a global process control uncertainty that is sufficient for production standards. CD-SEM and Scatterometry have intrinsic limitations that limit their utility for these cases, and new characterization methods are needed. Among the industrial reference techniques currently available, TEM and CD-AFM are generally employed to address this issues but both of these techniques have their own limitations for 1X node production. Nevertheless, they are also very useful for engineers to calibrate production CD metrology techniques and for more accurate process window and process development definition at the R&D level. Thus, there is a critical need to develop new technologies that build upon these capabilities while overcoming the limitations.
KEYWORDS: Line edge roughness, Photoresist materials, Atomic force microscopy, Line width roughness, Scanning electron microscopy, 3D image processing, 3D scanning, Scanners, Laser scanners, Semiconductors
We characterized the roughness and side wall morphology of lithographically produced nanostructures of resistmultilayer materials using the recently developed three-dimensional atomic force microscopy (3D-AFM), which has an independent Z scanner intentionally tilted to a certain angle access the sidewall. In order to produce different degrees of Line Edge Roughness (LER) in a given photoresist sample, we systematically varied the Aerial Image Contrast (AIC) at a constant dose for optically imaged resists. We describe herein the effects of AIC on KrF resists that were observed by using 3D-AFM and Critical Dimension-Scanning Electron Microscopy (CD-SEM). High-resolution sidewall images and line profiles obtained by the 3D-AFM technique demonstrate its advantages to characterize the shape and roughness of device patterns throughout the development and pattern transfer process. Taken together, we demonstrate that AFM imaging can identify a trend in Sidewall Roughness (SWR) as a function of AIC effects on photoresist sample, and CDSEM imaging provided supporting evidence to establish the LER trend.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.