The origin of life on Earth took a puzzlingly short time. Panspermia is appealing because it means that the origin of life
need not be confined to a few million years on one planet. Similar puzzles arise in the evolution of higher life forms.
Punctuated equilibrium, for example, seems to violate the darwinian account of gradual evolution by trial-and-error, a
few DNA nucleotides at a time. The strong version of panspermia alleviates this puzzle as well. If all of life comes
ultimately from space, genes may appear to be older than necessary, evolution by the acquisition of whole genes or suites
of genes, by horizontal gene transfer (HGT), becomes much more important, and punctuated equilibrium is not
surprising. Does evidence support this supposition? How common are old genes? How important is HGT versus the
gradual composition of genetic programs? We will look at these questions.
Evidence that extremophiles are hardy and ubiquitous is helping to make panspermia a respectable theory.
But even if life on Earth originally came from space, biologists assume that the subsequent evolution of life
is still governed by the darwinian paradigm. In this review we show how panspermia could amend
darwinism and point to a cosmic source for, not only extremophiles but, all of life. This version of
panspermia can be called "strong panspermia." To support this theory we will discuss recent evidence
pertaining to horizontal gene transfer, viruses, genes apparently older than the Earthly evolution of the
features they encode, and primate-specific genes without identifiable precursors.
The fact that organotrophic organisms on Earth use L-amino acids and D-sugars as an energy source
is recognized as one of the universal features of life. The chirality of organic molecules with asymmetric location
of group-radicals was described a relatively long time ago. Louis Pasteur observed that abiotic (chemical)
processes produced mixtures with equal numbers (racemic) of the two forms but that living organisms possessed a
molecular asymmetry that included only one of the enantiomers (homochirality). He speculated that the origin of
the asymmetry of chiral biomolecules might hold the key to the nature of life.
All of the amino acids in proteins (except for Glycine which is symmetrical) exhibit the same absolute steric
configuration as L-glyceraldehyde. D-amino acids are never found in proteins, although they do exist in nature and
are often found in polypeptide antibiotics. Constitutional sugars of cells, opposite to the amino acids, are the D-enantiomers,
and the appearance of L-sugars in Nature is extremely rare. Notwithstanding this fact, the metabolism
of some bacteria does have the capability to use amino acids and sugars with alternative chirality. This property
may be caused by the function of specific enzymes belonging to the class of isomerases (racemases, epimerases,
isomerases, tautomerases).
In our laboratory, we have investigated several anaerobic bacterial strains, and have found that some of these
bacteria are capable of using D-amino acids and L-sugars. Strain BK1 is capable of growth on D-arginine, but its
growth characteristics on L-arginine are approximately twice as high. Another alkaliphilic strain SCAT (= ATCC
BAA-1084T = JCM 12857T = DSM 17722T = CIP 107910T) was found to be capable of growth on L-ribose and L-arabinose.
It is interesting that this strain was incapable of growth on D-arabinose, which suggests the involvement
of some alternative mechanism of enzyme activity. In this paper, we describe the preliminary results of these
microbiological studies and discuss some possible implications.
There is a widespread sentiment that panspermia is uninteresting is because it does not answer fundamental questions about the origin of life. The strongest version of panspermia asks entirely new questions. While barriers to the acceptance of panspermia are falling and evidence supporting it is accumulating, the mere possibility of panspermia unhinges the Darwinian account of evolutionary progress. The new theory removes an issue dividing science and religion, but it requires an amendment to the big bang theory.
Panspermia, an ancient theory, was revived in its modern form by two of the present authors (H-W) in a series of publications over the period 1977 to the present day. Unpopular at first, it is now slowly gaining popularity and is coming to be discussed, albeit with a measure of apprehension, as a serious scientific possibility. A brief resume will be given of the modern scientific case for panspermia, indicating that astronomical, geological and biological evidence is moving slowly in the direction of a paradigm shift.
Conference Committee Involvement (1)
Instruments, Methods, and Missions for Astrobiology XVII
9 August 2015 | San Diego, California, United States
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.